THANK YOU BASED INTEL

videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i7-9700k-with-8-cores-and-no-hyper-threading-spotted

THANK YOU BASED INTEL

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

Attached: Intel-Core-i7-9700K-SiSoft-8-cores.png (1204x354, 29K)

Most of g doesnt even know what hyperthreading is lol

>8c/8t
SOPA DELiCIA

op is one of them

>Intel, I would like Hyper-threading on my i3
>i5? Why would you need HT on an i7?
>*CRASH*
>You'll be hearing from my lawers about wanting HT on anything less than an i9, goy.

>8C

Actually it's 4C8T but they figure nobody with notice if they only say it's 8T

Waiting for 1-core/single chip

Even child know what it is now that there are comic books about it...

Attached: MangaMicroprocessors_cover.png (473x625, 548K)

>3.6 gh
nigger what

I'm also kinda suspicious of that. The 8T doesn't make sense if it were a 8C system.

So, i7 is the new i5 then. Not worth buying and barely worth looking at.

I just upgraded to a Ryzen 1700 from a Sandy 2500k. Did I goof by not waiting for the Intel 9xxx series?

oh boy cant wait for the "single core perf is all that matters for games" intel damage control

>Less is more? I mean, the standard that has been established is 8c/16t.

If you're dropping Hyperthreading those cores better be fucking screaming harpies on PCP, or it's DOA.

IPC?
Power Consumption?
Boost Clock?

Nigga needs more information!

Attached: 47ede2009a588b95c16ce966b7344e55701f6c3d62f6be6de7e33ad502d35e7d.jpg (300x300, 64K)

8 cores means 8 GHz of power

This is not the highest end CPU, faggots

9900K is 8 cores 16 threads if you want the extra threads

Yeah, that's part of the problem idiot.

Attached: [Hisss].png (479x480, 89K)

How do i download HT for my Cyrix PR 133?

The chuuni was so pure

>3.6GHz
>8 cores
Literally Ryzen without SMT.

>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Productivity doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Performance per watt doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>Locked CPUs don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>Anti-competitive business practices don't matter!
>Locked platform features don't matter!
>Synthetic loads don't matter!
>PCI-e lanes don't matter!
>Burnt pins don't matter!
>ECC support doesn't matter!
>*NEW* 7nm doesn't matter!
>*NEW* StoreMI doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Security doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Stock coolers don't matter!
>*NEW* Games don't always matter!
>*NEW* Hyperthreading doesn't matter!

AHHHHHHH

Attached: 1455891551200.jpg (456x620, 29K)

And all for just $999! They're practically giving them away!

>lithography
>14nm+++
Or is it ++++ now?

RyZen can do stable 4GHz on ALL cores/threads even in gen1 (not even Zen+), you dumb fuck. This garbage Inturd shit is nothing like Zen.

Rude

That's with overclock, which the unlocked versions of this would be able to do.

I don't get it, why should I care how many "threads" I have?
Games don't even list the number of threads you're supposedly required to have, just the GHz.

>8T
>3.6GHz
Is this a fucking joke?

Attached: 1447161347847.jpg (1846x1923, 607K)

Based

Because computers can do more than just gaming.

P*lish subhuman

>how do we prevent side-channel attacks?
>remove sidechannels
>won't that cut performance from ~1280%/chip-core to 800%/chip-core?
>nobody gives a fuck, we're Intel
I'm using my personal experience where a eight hyperthreaded tasks got 80% the performance/thread of four non-hyperthreaded tasks.

The i9 cost 400$ and will destroy poozen

What if I don't use computer to anything else than gaming, music player and web browser at the same time?

It's till going to outperform ryzen 7 tho

but not zen 2 since that will match it's clockspeed and i9s have essentially the same performance as skylake trash from WW2.

Then get an i3.

8T

HAhahahahahaaHAAHAHAHA

>i9
>8C8T
>...
>FX8350
>8C8T

maybe Intel trying to tell us something here

Attached: hx082DG3TVg.jpg (1280x720, 103K)