UPDATE NOW FOR SUPERIOR COMPILER TECHNOLO/g/Y

phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=GCC-8.2-Relased

UPDATE NOW FOR SUPERIOR COMPILER TECHNOLO/g/Y

Attached: GNU_Compiler_Collection_logo.svg.png (868x1024, 111K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Clang is the better compiler.

Not since Linux cucked it with version 4.17.
I miss my clang compiled 4.16.

How did Linux cuck clang?

not sure about that but LLVM seems like the better compiler framework

>How did Linux cuck clang?
You can't compile Linux Kernel with clang since version 4.17.

Please avoid software that doesn't protect your freedoms, user (i. e., non-copyleft software).

>le fredumbs maymay xDdd

It's objectively worse and it uses the BSD license so there's literally no reason to use it unless you're a void linux fag too in which case

goddamn these fucking compiler-specific extensions are such fucking aids

>freedom is a meme
this is your brain on the botnet

>freedumb is what the kike at fsf says.

Can't wait until summer ends and you go away.

shills work all year around tho

>It's objectively worse
because of some negligible and statistically insignificant performance measurement? clang wins in tooling alone (very important)

>clang wins in tooling alone
source for this?

>clang wins in tooling alone
the idea that people are doing anything meaningful with libclang or libtooling is currently the biggest meme in C++ development.

I still use gcc-4.2.1

sauce ?

Try for yourself. 4.15 and 4.16 compile without any patches and 4.17 says it needs some shit that only GCC has.

I was not questioning it, just looking for a nice article explaining the reason why.

>Le summer maymay
Stop listening to kikes and start to use software made by the white man.

>software made by white men
>used and promoted by multinational corporations
enjoy your cuckware :)

how does GNU keep fucking up their software time and time again

Attached: gcc.png (706x674, 139K)

>deprecated
oh good another word Jow Forums doesn't understand

So did they fix the -frename-registers bug yet?

>because GNU shit isnt used by multinational corporations

GPLv3

doesn't matter if they use it, what matters is if they can make modifications and not return it upstream, or bundle it with their proprietary shit

gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
Dr. Stallman can tolerate cuck software licenses. Why can't (You)

>I dont know what the heck the license says
So? Its their decision.

That's not musl though.

My fav license is WTFPL but that webpage is a great reference, thanks.

It uses gcc specific stuff, there's not much to explain.