>> print([i for i in range(10) if i < 6 if i % 2 == 0])

>>> print([i for i in range(10) if i < 6 if i % 2 == 0])

Why is this allowed?

Attached: pangolin.jpg (454x681, 333K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mbnBYh-BJ1g
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I agree. Python should be banned.

wtf, why does multiple ifs work?

Python was probably an invention of the KGB because ".py" looks like the Cyrillic py (ru)

She's a thicc, dirty girl.

Oh yes it all makes sense now

First time I know that too

Fucking bigot. Girls can be programmers too.

Attached: KE6QNYV_d.jpg (640x604, 51K)

how did she even take the photo with both hands on the keyboard?

Hmmmm

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (800x652, 38K)

print( range(10).filter(lamba i: i < 6).filter(lamba i: i % 2 == 0).into(list) )

would be so much nicer style

>>> len('print( range(10).filter(lamba i: i < 6).filter(lamba i: i % 2 == 0).into(list) )')
80
>>> len('print([i for i in range(10) if i < 6 if i % 2 == 0])')
52

No

post the past 10 lines in your bash history, no cleanup

MILKIES

You have no idea...
youtube.com/watch?v=mbnBYh-BJ1g

That's actually a chilling question

That's becuase nobody ever has to use multiple consecutive ifs in a listcomp, when the 'and' operaror exists.

>lamba

I discovered this by accident, via copy/paste. Meant to wright and, but noticed the typo after I ran the code. I've been writing python professionally for nearly a decade, so it's rare that I encounter surprising syntax.

Tbh it can be helpful for code golf

ITT brainlets who can't comprehend functional programming and filters.

>threadly reminder that python 3.x is not pythonic

>lamba
i hate codacedmy fags so godamn much

Attached: 1504580559043.jpg (400x386, 37K)

Maybe she had her phone on a tripod and did a countdown snapshot. Or maybe someone else took it for her, idk.

How did I never notice this?

she sat at her desk with a gopro on
real ass street programming sheit nigga

I know it's not "pythonic", I bet python's lambdas are expensive as fuck. My point was that chaining iterators is leaner than list comprehensions. Neither is nice in python though.