how relevant is this test and post pic of your score
HTML5test
Ryan Adams
Sebastian Wright
Higher score = more botnet
Noah Lee
/thread
Mason Long
this
Why do I need all these features to view text sent over the electronic telegraph?
Owen Kelly
indeed
Lincoln Bennett
481 Firefox
Jace Brooks
Jackson Hughes
this
Eli Thomas
489 Nightly, same PC
Justin Johnson
Firefox 61.0 on Windows 10
Jack Torres
Henry Johnson
From my Windows 2000 VM.
Adrian Carter
Michael Collins
Even acid test become a challange for some become the most popular browsers become shit.
Nolan Garcia
How did I do?
Ryan Rogers
fpbp
Evan Thompson
ungoogled-chromium would like to speak with you
Henry Price
>do i fit in yet guise?
Elijah Turner
Julian Davis
Benjamin Davis
It's irrelevant. You actually don't want all those """features""" as they make the browser more insecure.
It also depends on other settings you make on the browser and if you're using any security/privacy/adblocking addons. So the test is kinda pointless.
I actually do have a legit result of Firefox in a speed test. It was probably a privacy setting that caused this to happen.
Jacob Powell
hmmm
Elijah Davis
My PC is better, user.
Nathan Ward
lel
Julian Nguyen
>Android 6
Jaxson Campbell
Now show an uncropped screenshot with the browser name, faggot
Jayden Ross
Yeah (((HTML5)))
Cameron Hernandez
Latest version of Firefox handles it okay. Why aren't modern browsers scoring the full percentage though?
Sebastian Reed
Not bad for a mobile browser I guess
Jaxon Russell
What is this list based on? I noticed that h.265 is listed, but to my knowledge that's not listed in any spec. Are they just listing any and all features that browsers might have? (Some versions of safari and edge seem to support it.)
To be fair it's listed as optional, and not worth any points, but even 'optional' feels misleading if it's not part of the spec. I just hate that we're still being pulled away from open standards.
Asher Howard
It's weird how I couldn't give two fucks about most of the shit my browser doesn't support.
Adrian Wright
>Why aren't modern browsers scoring the full percentage though?
Apparently 15 of the points that basically no one is getting are for something called "ObjectRTC". The pictured link to the spec doesn't even actually point the w3c.org, and it 404s. But it is apparently a real proposal, so I guess it's legit.
What bothers me is that they seem to just be arbitrarily assigning point values. How come Firefox and Chrome miss out on 15 points for not supporting this WebRTC feature, but Safari gets no penalty for not supporting Webm?
Jack Bennett
Carter Bennett
523 on my phone
Camden Sanders
Firefox v61
> inb4 shit html 5 support
I disable geolocation (20 points) and WebRTC (45 points) as well as other shit.
Daniel Reed
Same, lower score is better because less bloat. You just need basic html and some css.
Blake Gomez
Internally it's Chromium 67.0.3396.87. Dropped Chrome so hard after I found out this exists.
Aiden Richardson
>all those features
what's the point
it's feels like the only reason for an operating system nowadays is to just run a web browser
the cloud ruined everything
Luke Watson
Only a Firefox shill can pretend having a trash browser that is years behind is somehow a good thing.
Adam Jackson
Grayson Perry