What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?
Connor Rivera
Other urls found in this thread:
gnu.org
gnu.org
twitter.com
Owen Hughes
fuck you
Joshua Sullivan
Yet another redesign? The fuck?
Anyways, surefire way to kill brand recognition
Jackson Richardson
system 2 but change the second row with system 1's icons
Josiah Bailey
Why?
The original looked great and covered everything you needed to know just from the icon. A globe representing the internet, and a fire fox around it. Peak performance, plus nice to look at.
This is just boring shit, looks like a generic ad ridden phone app normies without standards use.
Cheap. Minimalism should go and stay go.
Jose Roberts
>looks like a generic ad ridden phone app normies without standards use.
Just like the browser itself, recently.
I have to admit, at least they know their Target audience.
Thomas Howard
So... it's gitlabs now?
Hudson Nguyen
I think that literally every logo redesign that every company or organization has ever done has been a waste of money, brains, and time. Once you have a recognizable and recognized logo, there's no reason to ever change it.
Jacob Green
>Once you have a recognizable and recognized logo, there's no reason to ever change it.
That's what GNU/tards actually believe.
gnu.org
Christian Turner
Mozilla needs to layoff 95% of their designers.
Bunch of monkeys inventing pointless work so they keep getting paid.
Jackson Sullivan
>utm_campaign=theverge
>utm_medium=social
>utm_source=twitter
>What do you guys think?
I think, no, I'm sure your life is worthless.
Wyatt Price
What were they thinking?
Nolan Ross
what the fuck
Logan Lopez
still tehbest
Andrew Richardson
Who cares? It's shit browser for SJWs.
Nathan Cruz
Botnet please.
Luke Adams
lol
Aiden Brown
I hope GitLab sues them
Julian Mitchell
Just make the Phoenix logo more professionally executed
Mason Nguyen
>what's important
making new logo for the project
>what's not important
making good soft so people will use it
I have a strange feeling they're browsing Jow Forums
Samuel Lewis
Both shit. Also are they trying to change the logo every years now?
Anthony Sanders
I bet this has something to do with webrender being on the final stages of implementation (speed ups aren't in yet though)
Kevin Green
It's trash.
Joseph Hernandez
They look pretty cool IMO
Lucas Murphy
>“As an icon, that fast fox with a flaming tail doesn’t offer enough design tools to represent this entire product family,” Mozilla designers wrote
What the fuck does this even mean? Why would you not use your wildly successful, universally recognised symbol for every icon? Isn't that the whole point of an icon? You don't see Coca-Cola swapping their iconic font out when they launch a new flavour.
Jonathan Taylor
>when your logo quality forms a bell curve
Aiden Ross
Juan Morales
>if we change the logo, maybe people will use our browser!
Isaiah Taylor
shruggy wuggies
uwu
Jeremiah Perez
System 1 is good, but the bottom 5 icons are better on system 2. So that would be good.
Jeremiah Russell
>designed by transwomen with love
Eli Ortiz
It means it's not inclusive enough, fucktard, the fuck you think it means!? Also: Marxists hate quality.
Adrian Parker
...and that's a good thing
Hunter Sanders
It means they're looking for a logo for their brand as a whole, including programs that aren't Firefox. It's not really a Firefox logo, it's a Mozilla logo, but rebranding for brand awareness.
Jonathan Rogers
I always change utm_source to some pornsite.
Bentley Wilson
You forgot the question mark
Gavin Reyes
Well the first logo is just GitLab and the second one is just a circle.
Dominic Murphy
Why so many colors and shit?
Parker Nguyen
umm no?
Colton Ortiz
colours are nice
Adrian Bailey
Did Mozilla just bought Gitlab?
James Hall
Fucking based.
Jacob Carter
Colours make shit stand out if you've got the whole set there together. You see this on a lot of preinstalled app-suites on android phones, for example. Their designers act as if people are just going to have all *their* apps on one screen next to each other, either through retarded ignorance or just that it makes the set look better when you present it to your boss.
Daniel Rodriguez
i don't know what anything outside of the second row is supposed to be
Henry Gutierrez
Represent alternative services offered.
Mason Diaz
Easier to tell icons apart. This is why monochrome icon packs and material design icons are trash, you can't properly distinguish icons.
Evan Rodriguez
Minimalism is the cancer that is killing design.
Look how nice the old logos had looked (minus the bird design of course).
Dominic Collins
>his software's logo isn't turtles having sex
Aaron Hall
Classic design mind
Michael Garcia
Left is some gay Google PlayStore shit.
Note - we are seeing a new evolution in graphic design. Decorative gradients and texture are being reintroduced into GUIs. Blurry glass panels and decorative animations. The age of flat design is over.
Jordan Powell
That's a fucking sick logo. Tjere are way worse logos in that list.
Noah Reed
I like it
Logan Jackson
This
Dylan Nguyen
the fuck, why don't they fixed memory leaks on their product instead of this shit?
Nathan Allen
>What do you guys think?
Hudson Perry
> The age of flat design is over.
Thank fucking god. I hope we can return to the 2000s design of making every fucking thing glossy, I unironically loved that.
Carter Wood
why can't this stupid flat-minimalistic-design trend die? it makes everything look cheap & poorly designed.
Asher Barnes
lol
Isaac Wilson
how's this look user
Evan Diaz
2009 is worse than 2013 though. The tail is too dull.
Eli Diaz
Didn't they just redesign the logo last year?
Wyatt Reyes
delet
Aaron Sullivan
What's your idea of a good design?
Cooper Butler
why is that fox fucking the earth?
Robert Flores
I always open my camera instead of my clock on my phone because the icons are almost the same color
Owen Roberts
>What do you guys think?
That I was right when I ditched Firefox for Chromium after the Quantum.
Looks like they will add even more shit like pocket and chat with her event every year instead of a better browser
Isaiah Green
gnu.org
What is the name of the turtles?
They are called Fred and George. And yes, they are both male.
Caleb Cook
pretty much everything designed pre-2015. the old 2013 firefox logo is still the best looking one
Jace Stewart
Does your launcher support custom icon themes?
Logan Bailey
This is relevant and accurate
William Brooks
>I always open my camera instead of my clock on my phone because the icons are almost the same color
Are you retarded or is this bait?
Elijah Nguyen
Firefox has been bleeding users for a decade and is close to the point of irrelevance now. The only thing people seem to recognise about Firefox's branding is that they want nothing to do with it. So why NOT change it? What do they have to lose at this point?
And don't say "hurr durr their loyal fans", because If all the fetid shit that Mozilla has forced down your throat at this point hasn't made you switch, a logo change sure isn't going to do it.
Evan Torres
>left is meme tier india app degsin
>right is literally what does that even mean.
Evan Anderson
I can't even tell what half of those icons are supposed to symbolize
Owen Martin
2030 logo, everyone.
Evan Campbell
I am retarded
(Actually, now that I look closer, they're both kind of circle-shaped, so that doesn't help)
Jordan Hughes
Nolan Wright
Nothing beats pic related. What's wrong with a logo that acutally represents the company, instead of shapes, swooshes, and gradients.
Jaxon Richardson
>represents the company
*the product
Justin Cox
Michael Morales
where's the fox???
Parker Campbell
2004 unironically the best
Julian Scott
Exactly. It has a perfect colour scheme, perfect contrast and a very recognizable shape. Overall 10/10
Why the fuck they would get rid of it is incomprehensible
Samuel Perry
but they already did that.. moz://a remember?
James Anderson
Sucks balls
Anyways I don't expect anything from Mozilla's design team, they even fucked up the display of the site on a 1080p screen
Ayden Garcia
It could've been kinda cool if they had invented a new amazing "moz" protocol, where accessing moz://a would actually lead to the mozilla website
Lincoln Scott
>cancer
Nicholas Evans
What a good use of funds and time, I'm glad Mozilla is dedicated to finding specific ways to annoy their own dwindling userbase.
>let's change things
>oh no our users are leaving and they say it's because our changes were in fact bad
>let's keep pushing on the things people openly dislike
>WHY ARE THEY LEAVING, WE'RE CHANGING THINGS! LEADER NOT MASTER!
Jordan Anderson
Yeah, that would be actually pretty cool, but they fucking need to fix this shit, that looks like crap and I'M USING FUCKING FIREFOX
Eli Adams
i think we're on to something here
as user already mentioned the constant logo shifting only dilutes the brand and makes it less recognisable by confusing people, they are literally only wasting money AND killing the product
Dylan Morris
>Phoenix
For them, now more than ever, this would be so fitting.
>only use Firefox because it does things other browsers don't
>they start removing those things
>there are no alternatives besides using old versions or forks maintained by literally who or yourself
what hell is this?
Hudson Collins
>finally make a logo using :// right when distributed content-addressed systems are becoming all the rage
/9c2f924fb2f7004e7979ab2027ca1d65/top/kek
Blake Roberts
They're not even aware of their products
Xavier Morris
I wish they'd stop chasing fads and do their own thing. Is this what happens with your company is bloated with women?
Brayden Brown
Looks like the final boss in an RPG maker game
Asher Morales
2005 was so comfy
Aaron Bailey
I was looking for this to post it
Nathaniel Thompson
The right one looks like the swirling water of a toilet full of bloody shit from a faggots raped anus.
Thomas Cook
>a new protocol JUST to link to a website
oh yes, and getting ads injected into our bloodstream is also an amazing idea!!!!
Parker Wright
OP's pic related is not the proposed firefox icons, it's the master brand logos.