And this ladies and gentlemen, is why noone uses freetard software

>no one uses gcc
Every day I think I've heard the dumbest thing a macfag could say and every day they prove me wrong.

COPE

>Photoshop
>illustrator
>high quality
no

>had to use the same icon twice on the mactards side
>it's not even the flat meme one

>had to use unofficial icons on the free software side to make them look bad

Are you even trying?

As much as I think furries are degenerate, right side looks as if it was made for literal cucks user.

You forgot
>people who use gcc surely choose it because of it's logo

But the things on the left are used, especially linux and gcc

Why didn't you post this?
>logo designed by apple for a free software project

Attached: llvm.png (1024x1024, 259K)

no one gives a damn about logos here

LINUX DESKTOP SUPERPOWER BY 2020

Nobody "uses" gcc though. It's all hidden behind cmake.

This is true.
I worked with FOSS people and most are on the autism spectrum.

They are uncompromising and arrogant and think that their "8 hours in Inkscape" putrid logo looks good because they worked on it.
Like Richard Stallman, retard doesn't see the issue in calling his shit "Free Software". Fucking autistic idiot.

Attached: 53ff1906295cc7e37227e03b79380a4f.png (800x800, 842K)

>is why noone uses freetard software.
Walmart uses.

Behold gnu.org/graphics/package-logos.html

Attached: logo.png (180x145, 34K)

>2018 Jow Forums in a comment

>use Qupzilla because it works with KDE themes
>gmail gets angry because I'm using an unsupported version of Safari

funny how linux gets better and windows and mac os get worse every major update

Windows is stable, it was never good, and will be never good, but it will never become shittier.

wow so code engineers aren’t also master ux/ui designers
if you don’t like it hire another person to

Attached: sudo-red-demo.png (1500x2250, 157K)

Absolute cringe.

it hasn’t changes since win7
it’s the same fucking nt kernel with a .1 increment
they just half assedly paste cruft and ugly menus over ancient residual shit from windows for workgroups with nt lan manager featuring ms bob

It sounds like he posted that aspie OpenSores devs are too autistic to realize that their own special OC art logos look like ass.

yeah but they complain about every design choice an autist makes it doesn’t matter, it’s not their specialty

Are these jokes

Attached: joan-of-arch.jpg (1000x1333, 306K)

It's funny how linux gets more bloat, systemd and NSAware with every release.

linux.pictures/

Attached: distroball-machine-demo.png (1500x2250, 323K)

>you can add logos to the list
let's get cracking Jow Forums

Attached: interjectg.png (1500x2250, 78K)

one is true
one is standard fud

Attached: IG.png (540x376, 435K)

I'll admit that I like a couple.

Attached: 1526446222420.png (1500x2250, 30K)

lmao

Attached: shishi.png (200x346, 38K)

>apple software
>not partly FOSS
and this is why no one should take this bait

>kali
>difficulty: nightmare
lol this is what script kiddies tell themselves

But there's a dragon on it.

which one is which?

Unironically, yes.

>trillion $ company more popular logol
>SOUL
>SOULLESS
Its ok for linux to be itself. Apple has convinced the corporate whores in UX that everythinfg must look like apple or is bad. Really logos don't matter and exist solely for superficial retards to make judgements with no basis on the software itself.

JUST

>no one uses linux because of its logo
Does Tux even actually appear anywhere in the majority of distros? You didn't even use the bitch tits version.

>bitch tits version
kek

>not being into chaos
I bet you shampoo twice

>Available on linux
On linux =! Freetard software

>noone uses freetard software
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Noone

Does he? I never knew.

>And this ladies and gentlemen, is why noone uses freetard software.
Your proprietary browser's grammar checker seems to be defective.
comma.guide/vocative-comma/

...dude

Because of some fugly icons? That can easily be replaced? You'd have to be pretty petty to ignore good free stuff because of that.

>open the door, kid, I will show you my freedom stick

See what I meant: I thought "nobody uses gcc" was the dumbest thing a macfag could say, yet today I wake up to read "gcc is always hidden behind cmake". I wonder what macfag stupidity tomorrow will bring!

>literally turtles making out
And some say freetards aren't autistic.

yes

Gcc is fucking dead.

Attached: image.jpg (240x170, 43K)

Fucking FOSS autists are just insufferable. Better designers might contribute, if they felt they are valued. There are actually people on this very site that think good design or a good user experience is for normies and they are above that.

nobody use that shit, OP still right
Apple knew what was doing

Nailed it.

What the hell is this???

Attached: TreeRoot96[1].jpg (96x64, 2K)

if you use linux in public in front of normal, well adjusted people, they will most likely assume you are a furry.

>implying normals know what a furry is

Newsflash: FOSS users don't give a shit about logos. We care about functionality, I guess apple fanatics will never understand that...

btw, you really shouldn't complain about logos when you're too stupid to understand the difference between white and transparent.

>implying normals know what a Linux is

Hint on Linux getting mainstream?

He's thinking that mac is an option to anyone but a college drop out that lives on daddy's money.

>Nope.

Amazing

A perfect example of an apple fanatic who doesn't know shit, not even about his own platform. Apple's own IDE uses llvm.

That's so dumb I don't know what it mean.

Attached: dhnlogo.png (394x208, 9K)

Attached: gnuae-logo.png (436x171, 18K)

Simply epic.

Attached: c-graph.png (541x355, 163K)

>20 year old shit no one uses anymore
At least try to make a decent bait next time.

This is beautiful.
Holy shit, it's actually wonderfully beautiful.

Attached: 1532027369126.jpg (480x689, 46K)

>no one uses anymore
Its literally logos for GNU, Linux, Firefox, GCC and GIMP you fucking retard.

Jesus bit-bucketing Christ

Attached: 1531432790641.png (600x448, 159K)

>change permissions 777
Kek

I think you mean old ass gimp and old ass Firefox.
The more modern gimp, ganoo, gcc and linux logos get a pass tho, but that's only 4 out of 11.

Meant for

>Does Tux even actually appear anywhere in the majority of distros?
It's opt-out in the default config, so I guess it does.

Attached: 2018-08-07--1533646432_1021x174_scrot.png (1021x174, 10K)

>old ass gimp
From their homepage.

Attached: wilber-big.png (300x224, 34K)

So what you're saying is that the logos for the things that people use look like shit?

...

>tries new GIMP, everything stutters
>refresh rate below acceptable

Why do I have to live a miserable life just because it's free?

Attached: 1532272351990.jpg (1533x2048, 265K)

Don't pretend to be dumb.
As you can see, there are two gimp logos on that picture, and one of them is not the one you posted here.

So? All 3 look like complete dogshit.

Found this gem

Attached: australian-linux-brotherhood.jpg (1000x1333, 189K)

>being this insecure that you must base your choice of software on the fucking logo of the program

Just imagine being this retarded

Attached: 1522235174735.png (1829x1644, 860K)

>imagine imagining second level trolling still works in 2018

(((clisp)))

The auctex logo isn't terrible though.

imagine being so retarded you use gcc