My Docker Experience

> apt update fails
hmm...
> Retry
hmm...
> See that the repo is misconfigured
> Go and try to find the line where the repo is located out of 8 text files
> Don't see it
> cat * | grep ock
Its there...
> It was in the first file I checked.
> Add [allow-insecure=yes]
Doesn't work
> Look it all up
> It was literally just that the part that said "tara" needed to say "bionic"
> Realize that the docker people have crappy instructions that won't work for any Linux Mint system
> Wonder how on earth this was passed
> Move on with life now that it works
> Be happy that you didn't give up on it

Pic unrelated.

Attached: Ted_Bundy_headshot.jpg (481x666, 30K)

Other urls found in this thread:

get.docker.com/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_(Unix)#Useless_use_of_cat
github.com/dokku/dokku
coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/rkt-vs-other-projects.html
github.com/blablacar/dgr
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

get.docker.com/

Best experience

Yeah, thats what I used. Turns out the repos are misconfigured for Linux Mint... buncha tar(d)balls...

Why you piping cat to grep? In fact why you using grep at all, use rg son .

Attached: IMG-20180816-WA0000.jpg (1600x900, 172K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_(Unix)#Useless_use_of_cat

beat me to it

Never heard of it. Thanks.

>Linux Mint
found your problem

Fake & gay.

If this keeps going on, you might eventually want to try rkt.

Might user. Oh, and Jow Forums question. Is it weird that I reply to the comments?

Not really. Weird you asked.

Attached: 1529708168702.jpg (701x896, 178K)

Whats rg?

Sell me on rkt, user. What is cool about it? I am familiar with Docker and use github.com/dokku/dokku with a custom Dockerfile for deployment on side projects.

>cat * | grep ock
holy fuck

Ripgrep

>Fake & gay.
Fake & gay.

> Is it weird that I reply to the comments?
No. Very little is weird on Jow Forums.

Attached: 1509026855047.png (689x720, 427K)

> What is cool about it?
Docker has a few weird extra steps and an extra daemon that usually doesn't feel necessary for most things.

Rkt is simply more like I'd generally expect things to work.

coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/rkt-vs-other-projects.html

Thanks. How stable is rkt in practice?

>cat abuse

Attached: 1531750231891.png (800x664, 260K)

>No. Very little is weird on Jow Forums.
Or, from another perspective, everything is weird on Jow Forums.
Being weird, or at least a little creepy, is the norm.

Stable for me, but that doesn't mean much I guess.

Pretty sure CoreOS container Linux ran quite a few commercial deployments though. [Past tense because RedHat bought it].

PS: That didn't cause everyone to drop it, but IDK if the situation now should be regarded entirely the same.

I do however guess RedHat bought the company for etcd and rkt and maybe flannel primarily... or the container Linux talent.

Oh, related to rkt, this is a thing I fairly like [but it's not one of these tools that everyone uses]:
github.com/blablacar/dgr

I am looking at rkt now and the biggest difference from Docker so far is that the architecture actually makes sense to me. If I am running systemd, I might as well put it to work. Normal shell scripts over Dockerfiles are very welcome. The pod spec looks like an adequate standardized replacement for docker-compose.

I am not a fan of monocultures, so I hope Red Hat is betting on rkt like you're saying. Maybe it will be able to compete with Docker. I'll try using rkt and look at dgr, too. Is there anything like Dokku (a simple buildpack-based self-hosted PaaS) for rkt?