>winbabby tries to disprove Phoronix
>gets the same results
AHAHAHAHAHAHA WINFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
Winbabby tries to disprove Phoronix
Zachary Harris
Other urls found in this thread:
phoronix.com
twitter.com
Matthew Rodriguez
>owning threadripper or a core i9
absolute /v/ cringe
Carson Harris
Now I'm really tempted to upgrade to a TR 2900
Lucas Walker
I thought this has been a known thing since supercomputer all use linux
Benjamin Gutierrez
Brainlet here.
Aren't there special versions of Windows designed speficially for this kind of stuff?
Daniel Johnson
>/v/
Linux is anything but /v/, baby.
Julian Gray
*Cries in bash*
Thomas Wilson
stop crying
Oliver Ward
>threadripper on linux
>/v/
ahahhaha get the fuck out of here user
Nathan Baker
Jesus, why is windows such a pile of poo?
Kevin Reed
>by trying to set up Linux I started to appreciate Windows 10 more
Steve confirmed cuck
Julian Price
Jesus fucking Christ that performance difference is colossal.
Wyatt Stewart
No, windows scheduler is universally shit.
Luis Walker
We have known this since Zen 1. Winblows literally shits the bed on high core counts and throws threads all over the place.
Gabriel Fisher
Wasn't per core licensing in the drawer?
aka, how to make professional pay more for no reason?
A wild guess is, M$ gimps high core count CPUs because they need to sell Windows Server licenses.
Lincoln Martin
phoronix.com
Nope. Even the windows server edition is shit compared to desktop oriented Linux.
Thomas Ortiz
I switched to Linux a year ago and I've never missed Windows.
Back in the day Windows was more polished and Linux gave you workflow headaches. These days Windows is a pain in the ass and Linux much more polished. Speed is better in Linux, security. The only reason to use Windows is games
Ryan Edwards
it's actually worse on server 2016.
Ryan Mitchell
>threadripper
>linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mason Carter
Linus Trollvalds says the benchmarks favor Linux and that the I/O starved nature of Windows makes it look worse. I don't buy it.
Landon Green
>windows 10 based systems are even worse*
i wonder if the old trick of having windows media player running tin the background during the tests still improves the results
Adam Jackson
wtf is this real
Christian Jenkins
It does not sound unreasonable that the OS takes that as a hint of needing soft-real-time performance
Owen Murphy
is it windows 10 thing or windows in general
Jordan Kelly
please get the fuck out, stop clogging the board with your consumerist trash
Adam Wilson
it used to be, at least, dunno if anymore thats why im asking
iirc it made the kernel timer run at a higher rate, which improved performance is some edge cases
Liam Morgan
Because Microsoft no longer cares about Windows in its current incarnation. Its coasting entirely on its current install base and legacy software library.
They know they don't have the server space, they know they can't contest the home/pro desktop space going forward. Like it or not Windows is morphing into a iOS/Android style OS for media consumption devices and dumb frontends for office cloud services.
They're hoping the Xbox/UWP game library will carry them with young people until they age into the work force and that their lead in the office desktop space will last long enough for that to happen.
Tyler Gomez
Joseph Mitchell
Bravo pajeets
Jackson Williams
How come 7980 is faster than 2990? I think there is something wrong with the tests.
John Roberts
The 7980XE clocks higher, has slightly better IPC and has less latency between cores. Also, not all benchmarks scale as well with the number of cores/threads, something Steve refuses to acknowledge despite the glaring evidence he himself gathered.