Nvidia BTFO
Nvidia BTFO
Brayden Morgan
Henry Martinez
BUTTHURT BUTTHURT BUTTHURT BUTTHURT
Ethan Peterson
He probably bought a Vega 64
Isaac Parker
it's called marketing. fat fuck knowitalls on twitter aren't their target
Ryan Campbell
Yeah they're targeting the fat fuck knowitalls on memechan
Austin Young
Lold
Joshua Brown
If they get caught cheating on benchmarks again then something is wrong
Easton Thomas
This guy doesnt know shit about cars. Those things are all related and work together in car, they arent "separate tasks" that a car has to do. If one of those is abysmal the rest of the car is affected. He used a poor analogy but I wouldnt expect anything else from a fat fuck on twitter
Carson Butler
I got real scared when jensen proposed an entirely new metric for benchmarks.
>Their metric
this won't end well.
yes it is pure marketing. But a very complex kind. They'll build the narrative and provide the tools to measure all things according to their own standards. They went from increasing public image into narrative building territory.
That's above corporate monopoly talk, that's totalitarianism Weltanshauung/ideological turf.
Ethan Martin
Nigga are you retarded?
Low RPM and torque can be geared, low displacement can be turbo'd, etc.
>inb4 no replacement for displacement
Anthony Robinson
Nicholas Harris
He's like the main editor at anandtech, and the main GPU reviewer, pretty sure he has any GPU he wants.
Kayden Jenkins
>modifying a car changes its characteristics
no shit. But we are talking about from the factory as these GPUs are.
Zachary Ramirez
They already own the market. It's the logical next step
Lucas Jones
This guy is functionally retarded. Adding complex hardware accelerated instructions to a processor is what everyone has been doing for the longest time. It's no different than big AVX registers. Once they became available in hardware those tasks were sped up enough to where they could be integrated into software more often. They will come up with ways to use the new hardware to improve and accelerate graphics techniques. The end result is more realistic graphics, and no surprise running the same workload on older processors is much slower. The test changes to take advantage of current hardware, and the software will end up the same way. Game engines have already added it, and MS has already added the instructions to DX12. Ray tracing in graphics isn't even a new or novel concept.
Jeremiah Wright
>posting notorious amdrone
Mason Reed
NOOOOOONONONONONO PFFFFCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Nathan Watson
Connor Bennett
delet
Nathaniel Parker
good stuff it reminds of the pica pica demo of ea that they said it was running on a dgx system with 4 V on them
(carefull this was the MAIN point of leather jacket man to increase the price of this generation)
turns out the demo was capable of running on a single card
twitter.com
and they used a dgx because nvidia said so
Logan Diaz
you probably own a yugo
Jackson Garcia
*breaths in* OH NONO NO NO HAHAHAJAJA
Austin Martinez
ANX might actually be a good anology for these gay tracing cores, but avx is advertised in FLOPs if I'm not mistaken. What ryan smith is complaining about is making the new RTX cards sound like they're 5-10 times better than the last generation when in reality they're just going to be 20% better and additionally they'll run the new ray tracing graphics effects more efficiently than older generations. If what they say is true and a billion games are using the technology already then that's the real boon from these announcements. I mean their own presentation showed subsurface scattering in 2004 with the 8800gt but that has hardly seen any traction as a technology until consoles could run it. Nvidia is paying a lot of money to force ray tracing into as many places as they can so their new graphics generation seems like more than it actually is and let them charge substantially more for it because they didn't want margins to shrink on the extra silicon usage.
Brayden Green
surprised he didn't say bologna
Joseph Reed
How can he be so sure that RT core can't accelerate pixel shading?
Jose Ward
Because RT and rasterization are fundamentally different and if the RT core can do rasterization then Nvidia is wasting silicon area on pointless shit instead of just adding more fp32
Jose Howard
>screenshot of a twitter post
>(subject) BTFO
Jow Forums called they want you back.
Jordan Peterson
Because he's been following GPU development for a decade and half at an extremely detailed level.
Have you read any of his articles?
anandtech.com
anandtech.com
Benjamin Morgan
Because a fixed function unit stops being fixed function when it starts being multi function, like shaders.
Anthony Young
thx bro
maybe some of rasterization pipeline share same math with those RT core
Angel Bell
delete this post
Andrew Clark
hey what's wrong with yugo?
>pic related, my baby