Let's try again yesterday's thread (>>67219256)

Nice proj. Checked.

You don't need to be actively programming it to post it in either.
Please cut out the shit excuses.
kys cunt.

Attached: IMG_0523.jpg (736x606, 46K)

I pulled an onion routing protocol out of thin air in 6 months somehow and it is almost in a working state.

but no one really cares about it yet, thank fucking god.

github.com/loki-project/loki-network

Try Gitea
gitea.io/en-us/

>THIS IS A TEST INSTANCE ONLY! REPOSITORIES CAN BE DELETED AT ANY TIME!
Hm.

holy quads

Now this is amazing.

github.com/kibook/s1kd-tools
Tools for a niche technical documentation specification called S1000D. Something I am developing for and use every day at my job, but there's very little open discussion of S1000D on the web, so I don't know if there's an audience (aside from myself) for FOSS, command-line tools like these.

Attached: s1000d.png (200x188, 4K)

What's the monkey supposed to represent?

coding.net/

Attached: monkey.png (396x371, 18K)

I wrote the Zsync (similar to rsync, arguably better) algorithm in python and I'm adding support for asyncio and aiofiles so the process uses asynchronous IO and won't block when reading from a file. Google pyzsync if you want to check it out.

bump

>Jow Forums - Technology
>only two threads for programmers allowed

i don't remember that in hondura's flag

Nice

Would you guys be interested in a program which converts any file to an image?

Are you the guy who wrote github.com/Daem0n-th/Imager ?

Yeah user, That's me. I'm glad someone at least saved the link.
What do you think of it? I did a video version of it, so that I can use youtube for storing data. But it takes relatively long time to encode the data

What error correction does it do? Like if I converted the png to a jpg quality 50.

It's gone to shit when you convert it to jpeg. I suppose it's possible but you'll sacrificing data capacity

so that's a libcurl-based wget-like tool?
cool
>but the only thing that "worked" for me was a buggy shit written in Java
what do you mean?

what is it supposed to be doing?
I did
./imager.py -f 1534795953032s.jpg -o 1534795953032s.txt -d
./imager.py -f 1534795953032s.txt -o 1534795953032s.2.jpg

and I got picture related
shouldn't it be the same as OP pic?
also change shebang to "#!/usr/bin/env python3"
only in Arch is everything accessible in /bin (as everything symlinks to /usr/bin)

Attached: 1534795953032s.2.jpg (196x196, 8K)

Don't use the decode on the first. You're encoding it. Also output should be a png file, input can be any file. After that use -d you should get the same file.

I have no idea what to use it for, but it's still fun to play around with (both the image and video version).

./imager.py -f 1534795953032s.jpg -o 1534795953032s.png
./imager.py -f 1534795953032s.png -o 1534795953032s.jpg -d

indeed returns the exact same file
nice
maybe add something like that on README

Attached: 1534795953032s.png (39x39, 3K)

Thanks user.
Yeah, the README is lacking. I'll add.

crashes for me on saving the file unfortunatley

What was the file size?

unrelated to filesize. the PIL/Image.py line 1662, in save format = EXTENSION[ext]

But python was also in a different location from the shebang in your script so I changed that there.

Oh, Okay. I will change that.
It crashes when the filesize is too big, so I thought maybe that.

Programmed a delta copy tool for super big files >2TB to create backups in an efficient way. Didn't find anything similar.

github.com/Cloudnaut/HFFDC

Attached: 1506568571519.jpg (468x240, 53K)

Isn't that exactly what rsync-backup is used for? Not to be a dick I'm just curious

As far as I know rsync isn't really working for my use case, since it always checksums the target destination fresh. Therefore it has to read the whole file from the flash drive. This took ages

/dpt/ threads are always trap threads with trashtalk

Oh that makes sense, thanks. So you avoid this by assuming the integrity of the destination and copying only the delta?

I wrote this way back when pywal wasn't a thing, then I adapted it to work with pywal, it's called wpgtk and it's a "ricing assistant" helping you generate colorschemes from images.

this colors are replaced in multiple configuration files with the help of templates, which you can easily create and edit.

github.com/deviantfero/wpgtk

Yes, you checksum the blocks of the file locally on your device which shouldn't take that long since the read rate for internal drives is in comparison really fast.

Afterwards you copy the file with its checksum file to your external drive or flash drive. Initial copy takes long of course.

After you changed your file partially, you recreate the checksum with the same blocksize for the local file. In my case these big files are mainly HDD-Files of virtual machines.

When you initiate a copy only the checksums for the blocks are compared. Differing block-checksums are indicating changes.

Data integrity checks are planned for future. But those would take long because you have to recheck the whole file.