AMD 7NM APU in 2018 (VideoCarxz exlusive)

videocardz.com/77660/expreview-amd-expected-to-launch-7nm-apu-at-the-end-of-this-year

BRACE YOURSELVES!!!

share your predictions below;

>8 Core / 16 thread
>Vega 20
>7nm
>5GHz
>soldered IHS
>30W TDP

Attached: 1515816507397.png (633x900, 114K)

Other urls found in this thread:

amd.com/25x20
notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-7-2800H-Ryzen-5-2600H-Vega-20-and-Vega-12-entries-spotted-in-AOTS-DirectX-12-benchmarks.309554.0.html
youtube.com/watch?v=5XRWATUDS7o
translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https://www.computerbase.de/2018-08/preis-intel-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700-euro/&edit-text=
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

12 core, 24 thread
4.6jiggahertz
7nm
Soldered
115w TDP

"3400G" being 6/12 cores/threads, 4.3 boost, Vega 24CU, 65W TDP
Hopefully

bs I just bought a 2200g and now they say this. not buying another one I know your jewish ways AMD

> APU
Who cares. People need a new cheap and powerful GPU.

d

> GPU
Who cares. Only gaymers and machine learning memers need those. You are not a manchild gamer, are you?

>8 core 5GHz
>30W TDP

I am and proud.
Anyway, I care more about GPGPU performance and Vega doesn't do more than 1080Ti and that's a bad thing.

they don't read the fine print:

amd.com/25x20

>AMD Reference Platform, “Raven Ridge 2018” AMD Ryzen™ 7 2800H, 2x8GB DDR4-3200, Samsung VLV2560 SSD
Windows 10 x64 16299.64, Graphics Driver: 23.20.768.0, 1920x1080

so yeah, it's not released yet, but the 2800H name was mentioned and leaked already before.

expect it to be more beefy than the 2400G, but still on the same node (no 3xxx to see here) and still a 4 core/8 threads CPU with a fully working Vega 11 unit.

>8 Core / 16 thread
>5GHz
>30W TDP
yeah, that aint happening. i hope im wrong, tho

>>>> /v/

> >>>> /v/

Might as well add 10 Gigarays, 16 bits and 11GB memory because its much more believable than any of that shit.

seething

see and for example
notebookcheck.net/AMD-Ryzen-7-2800H-Ryzen-5-2600H-Vega-20-and-Vega-12-entries-spotted-in-AOTS-DirectX-12-benchmarks.309554.0.html

>The Ryzen 7 2800H is a 35W 4C/8T part clocked at 3.4 GHz base (turbo clock unknown) with integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 (704 SPs) making it in line with the more powerful 65W Ryzen 5 2400G.

So it's a slightly lower clocked Ryzen 5 2400G but for mobile platforms and around half the power consumption (35W instead of 65W) - that's why it's so high in the efficiency chart.

Attached: 1532757336825.png (992x1043, 614K)

DELIIIIIIDDDDDDDD DIISSSSSSS
PFFFFFCCCCCSSSSSSSHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

Attached: 5750212647280.png (400x400, 91K)

noooooooo delid

HOW DARE AMD RELEASE A BETTER PRODUCT IN A RELATIVELY SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.

10000 cores
10000 GHz
8 threads per core

>Imaging having 80000 threads to run in the first place

THESE JEWS

Attached: Immortal bitches _d796811f8f92048068a55fe9384b6b83.jpg (300x173, 14K)

>still no have a dedicated memory module for the GPU
Into the trash it goes

t. intel gpu engineer

Well to be fair, wanst the Vega in these apus kinda starved for memory, having to share ram?
Imagine a 2 GB hbmeme thrown in there as a shared L4

Sure but it would be too expensive

e

>bought 2400G last week
Did I mess up?

probably not, we still don't know

AMD still better duct tape a raytracing and machine learning ASIC onto Vega just to be double sure.

>Still waiting 14nm APU Thinkpads

Attached: 1386004205922.jpg (1200x944, 185K)

l

Just do it like intel, make the CPU go from 2GHz to 5GHz and rate the TDP at 2GHz so it's just 20W lmao

>GAY TRACINNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGG

i

d

AMD XFR ray-tracing > intel turbo booft

Attached: 1534204099106.png (1920x1080, 611K)

I need zen2 and 7nm gpus

I forget where I saw it but someone was talking about the new TR 2990WX and how it's "rated" at 250W TDP, but at full load it ramps up to over +600W.

Dick ryzen.

put a cooler rated for 140W on a 7960X and a 250W cooler on a 2990WX, then tell me which one ends up throttling

delid dis

Buying Ryzens will always mess you up since they're only gonna get better every year.

>Thinkpads
why

Seeing this makes me excited, but also a bit sad

Except that you can generally resell them for a decent amount.

Attached: IMG_20180822_172828.jpg (1078x594, 103K)

This, my body is ready

you messed up buying that over the 2200g anyway

Don't tell me you seriously didn't knew about the 2300x and 2500x

This is a clickbait site misinterpreting a Hot Chips slide about forecast power savings in the 2018 12 nm APU refresh.

There is no way in fuck AMD would tip its hand with its 7 nm chips on a fucking laptop chip of all things.

im looking forward to the segfaults.

WHERE'S THE NEW GPUS

Attached: 1534815389043.png (1808x1204, 920K)

Anyone buying between the launch of the 1080 Ti (Buying the 1080 Ti itself is fine) to 2020 is an idiot unless you got a good deal price wise. Everything will be in place by then. We will know how Navi performs. Nvidia will have their 7nm node launch. AMD will have had their 7nm CPU and APU launches and Intel will be pushing 10nm out of the door (limping?).
Buying RIGHT NOW (Unless you are buying a 1060-1080 Ti for a REALLY good price) is retarded. Especially if you already have a 1060-1080 Ti, RX 580-Vega 56 or 2500K-8700K (I completely skipped Ryzen 1 and 2 and am waiting for Zen 2 instead. Same goes for GPU's as I already own a Vega 56 I got on launch day which I consider reasonable value for what it offers prior to cryptoniggers).

it really is retarded of them
they haven't even given it enough time to change their public image and they're already going all out
what happens when they don't have anything new to offer? and they already prematurely ejaculated all of their current goodies?

this

IT'S NOT FAIR

its a clocked down version of current apus user some of them like the 8880p goes down to 10watts..

Are you saying they should do an Intel and sit on their laurels waiting for their competitor to catch up? Why would that be better?

it wouldn't, he's just baiting and implying that AMD has nothing else to release in the next 3 years, or that the stuff they release won't be enough to change mindshare

lol Jayz
youtube.com/watch?v=5XRWATUDS7o

>"3400G" being 6/12 cores/threads, 4.3 boost, Vega 24CU, 65W TDP
>Hopefully
a poorfag can dream

But e485 was released like month ago?

TDP doesn't mean power consumption, it represents heat output

he should go back to making shitty rap

They still can go all out in the notebook market and kill intel there, by using 60% lower power consumption than the current generation.

The current 2700X (105W) will consume 45W, the 2700 (65W) 26W, the APUs (15W-25W nominal) 6-10W.

But on the other hand, ARM is expanding in that sector too, so it will be two newcomers kicking a comatose body that can't properly respond (10nm dual core without IGPU anyone?)

* basing the numbers on the "60% power reduction" mentioned by GloFo

They'd have to hope that OEMs break away from Intel's offerings of rebates and such, because otherwise Intel has a solid grip on the laptop market.

jayztwoshekels

the 60% power reduction and 40% higher performance is compared to 14LPP, not 12LP

4ghz + 40% = 5.6 ghz ?????????

ehhh, I don't know
I'd rather wait and see than try guessing what it'll be like
It's harder to be disappointed if you're not expecting something that good

5ghz should be more realistic

like I said, I don't know
the clocks at voltage wall from 14LPP to 12LP indeed increased by 10% (4.1 to 4.5)
4.5 to 5 is just another 10% increase though

7nm is supposed to be a much much bigger jump than 14 to 12. Though 5.5 Ghz sounds too good to be true.

yeah, I know
14LPP runs with good efficiency until it gets to 3.3GHz, after that the clock/voltage curve starts getting fucked up

Attached: zen1 voltage curve.png (1509x905, 55K)

I hope we get some leaks about zen2 soon the wait is being really dreadful

We'll get info on Zen2 when EPYC2 parts start sampling at the end of this year.

you're right, at least we'll know how well TSMC's 7nm is

It should be a substantial departure from current transitional FinFET chips in performance. Impossible to say where the high end will be in terms of frequency, but the low end at any given TDP should be much higher. I'd expect the base frequencies of the enterprise parts to be around 3ghz instead of 2 something.

that, when paired with a slight IPC increase, would literally murder intel on the server market

AMD really should watch out, intel is planning to release 32c server cpu with 8 channel ram
I wonder how AMD will answer to it

Seems a lot of the finance world is expecting that. Intel isn't getting hammered by analysts and credit rating bodies because of memes. They're getting downgraded because they have nothing compelling in their largest market segment for the next few years.
Charlie at SemiAccurate wrote that intel is basically dead in the water until either 2021 or 2022 for enterprise. Hes probably right on the money.

next few years are going to be interesting

Do APUs crossfire with AMD GPUs?

Attached: Pentamerous+Metamorphosis.png (500x500, 470K)

>64c/128t cpus with 16 channel ram, will need sodimms so it can fit the required 64 memory slots on the 2S boards

I'm not sure if the hybrid Crossfire scheme is still supported.

no, it used to be supported only in the bulldozer APUs

this is exactly why I'm still sitting on my 1500x

560 EUROS = 650 BURGERS FOR 9900K LOL

translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https://www.computerbase.de/2018-08/preis-intel-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700-euro/&edit-text=

Node shrinks never give exact performance/power/size scaling that a foundry claims. Foundries use simplified test circuits and basic SRAM cells to make those claims.
On top of that the design rules for every new node are radically different now. Porting a CPU from XXnm to Xnm lithography might by necessity mean the CPU needs 10% more transistors just to run at the same clocks in a stable manner.

I'm sure Intel could make a 14nm Prescott Pentium4 that runs at 7Ghz and uses 10 watts...
But a 2 watt ARM A-73 core would still be faster.

and to think that the 3700X will destroy it

Just return it ;)

you say this like zen2 will only be a node shrink of zen+, and not a big architectural change

"Transistor Performance" =/= circuit frequency
40% better transistor performance could mean anything, leakage, inactive power, heat dissipation, and switching speed.

HE was talking about a hypothetical 7nm mobile 2700X, not me.
I never said 7nm Zen is just going to be a shrink.

Lean how to fucking read you read like a nigger

if amd managed to go from 4-4.1GHz to 4.3-4.5GHz just from 14nm to 12nm then 7nm will be a bigger clock bump, 5ghz is almost guaranteed

it's device performance, not transistor performance
disregard the red marker

Attached: 7LP.png (781x620, 167K)

Not replacing my 2500k until a CPU comes out with 5GHz stock speed and a power draw that doesn't make my lamps flicker.

Attached: stop the h8 m8.jpg (808x518, 97K)

Have this image as reference

Attached: cbr15-ipc-comparison-scores.png (1278x959, 87K)

people discussed this in much greater depth years ago already

Attached: 9114301_c17be444b5869b02225cc89f52b5645f[1].png (1041x662, 57K)