Most of the largest websites are using session replays now, which record every key press...

Use selenium webdriver
Whenever you want to click something, inspect element and click the command

Attached: nu g.png (982x327, 20K)

this is why i phonepost
:^)

Is the keypress in the site or as long as you are on the site? Say if you are on facebook with chrome and you are typing a word documtnet, then facebook can steal everything?

Is this bait

it's a specific script that tracks actions on a website. ublock should block them by default. you ARE using ublock, right user? you're fine, then.

>don't mind me, only stealing

how do they do it and why did the browser makers put such features in their browsers?

Attached: 20160504_164851.png (1372x904, 1.48M)

0.0.0.0 is shit. pages will be loading infinitely because theres no timeout for that ip

What should I use then?

How is logging every move spatially efficient?

damn
they know all of my many typos and grammer mistakes

Being able to tell where the mouse is or what buttons are being pressed are essential features to get any sort of UI working. Web "apps" could not function if such abilities weren't present in JS/browsers.

Setting up pi-hole would be an option, pi-hole redirects shit to its own web server which immediately responds with a blank page.

Your browser should only send key presses to the tab that is currently selected, and it shouldn't send key presses to anything if another program is the active window.

ublock should catch the most popular session replay scripts (mouseflow, smartlook etc.) but alot of websites roll their own, or serve them from their own domain which ublock will miss.
It seems to be a fundamental problem of javascript just offering too much info to websites.

Attached: 1532347887160.jpg (540x698, 57K)

A single key press is something on the order of 4 bytes. Mouse movement can easily be aggregated to total delta in the last quarter second and would be 8 bytes.
A full minute of raw replay data probably wouldn't exceed 2KB of data, and that's before any attempts to compress it.

Attached: 1533167794470.jpg (960x960, 106K)

yes it's bait, don't (You) him.

thanks user

Not surprising, after Microsoft bought 127.0.0.1.
>mfw linux users think they're safe when running stuff on localhost

Google is also rumored to be bidding on the 192.168.*.* range, but that would probably run afoul of EU antitrust law.

Attached: 1522587833644.jpg (640x640, 43K)

That's wrong, Linux won't even try to connect

What the fuck, is this true?
Sources?

I use 127.0.0.1

The sad truth is hosting anything on the internet costs money, and the bigger you are the more your infrastructure costs. And you are left with 3 ways to make money. Donations, Subscriptions and Advertising. And with many users blocking conventional advertising mechanisms they are forced to use these more insidious methods.

Honestly it's a bit chicken and egg. If ads didn't get obtrusive and shitty, people probably wouldn't have blocked them so religiously. But they pushed it too far and it blew up in their face. Even if they make ads less shity, so many people block ads they'd never notice.

It doesn't matter even if it's true, devices simply will not route traffic on those ranges.

UMATRIX

No but seriously throw burp (free is fine) on a website and see just how much fucking garbage is sent.

Are you trying to say that the top 400 websites cannot make enough money to sustain themselves without resorting to "more insidious methods"?

This is why I have AT LEAST two mouse jiterrers plugged in at all times

everyone to tor then?

choose between privacy or speed

>be CIA
>lol the guy with 2 mouse jitters is fapping at tranny furries again

i want to have this job

They don't.
HTTP is practically the only big transfer protocol that's entirely centralized and requires ridiculous infrastructure in geographically placed servers, load balancers, content delivery networks, so on and on.
DNS is decentralized, IRC is decentralized, NNTP is decentralized, torrents are decentralized, FTP might be centralized but there are functionally equivalent mirrors for everything.
HTTP is about the most expensive protocol to provide a service with.

Plenty of large sites don't even maintain their own hardware, but in some cases renting out endless virtualised hardware from a major server company at least initially works out cheaper than rolling your own hardware and a fat pipe, as well as being scaleable.

Plus you have to pay employees and your 15 bedroom Seattle penthouse

based 169.254/16 still pure
where my link-local niggas at

But your bosses would be satanic pedophiles and you'd know your paycheck came from opiates and cocaine production. And you can't quit or they kill you.

jokes on them I swap between mouse wheel scroll, pageup/down and arrow keys every other tab

Don't forget the most important entry:

0.0.0.0 Jow Forums.org
0.0.0.0 www.Jow Forums.org
0.0.0.0 boards.Jow Forums.org

of course not, these IP ranges are designed not to be routed outside your LAN

I do all 3 and move my mouse randomly
they'll know it's me because of how spastic I am

>2KB/min
Now multiply that by the average amount of time a person spends on facebook a day: 20 minutes.

>40kb/day
Finally, multiply that by the number of facebook users: 2.23 billion

Now facebook is adding a whopping 89.2 TB of data everyday.
That's 32 PB every year.

I'm not saying they couldn't do it. They most likely can easily spare all of that. But you can't just shrug it off or say that it's efficient.

when I copy pasted that into my / etc/ hosts file I got a little blood rush to my penis
is that normal?
also is there a way to link files inside of files or no? I was thinking of separating my massive blocked hosts by category into separate files but I guess it doesn't matter that much

more than half of that only use their phone, I'm sure.. and I can't imagine 2 billion are "every day" users
maybe just euro / usa

They can process the data and just save the relevant fingerprint, you don't need all historical data once you can identify a person accurately.

jokes on you because you're the only one alternating between all of the methods frequently

how could he have not thought of this lmfao

20+ minutes/day is the global daily average a user spends of facebook (the data might be outdated).
Do you know what an average is, user?

The average on usa is 50 min/day (might also be outdated).

that's not for 2.2 billion people.

You're right. I found some better statistics
>zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/

Fell free to redo the math. By the way, the first number (2kb/min) was taken out of that other user's ass.

1. No js
2. Blocking all non user initiated gets/posts
3. Wget

How much kb/min is it to take numbers out of each others asses across the globe via Jow Forums?

JavaShit was a mistake.

you are smart, couldnt come up with this even though I know alot about unique fingerprints.

>1.47 billion people on average log onto Facebook daily
still unbelievable honestly, that is fucking sad.. Jow Forums is way better to waste 20 hours a day
yea 2kb/min is low if they actually were tracking mouse movements, which they aren't. Keys typed is totally believable though, maybe even clicks, but I doubt that too, probably only links clicked and keys typed.

>2. Blocking all non user initiated gets/posts
How do I block specific gets/posts?

bump

Not just JS, the whole idea of having webpages run code and active content in general - no matter what language you do that in - was the mistake.

Delete delete delete delete delete delete delete

Is there any hope of some kind of browser/extension being able to block all this shit, or is it too ingrained into the software to avoid?

Just block javascript, which you should already be doing for the past 10 years or so.

You'd have to block JS from being able to see or respond to user input. Which is essentially disabling JS. I doubt this can be stopped by any means short of not running JS.

Good...
I wonder if they can tell when i'm whacking my dick to my ad-free experience that isn't influenced by the data they collect.

lol

>Jow Forums.org
Nuuuuuuuuuuuu!

Attached: slight_shock_and_dismay.png (538x289, 300K)

U M A T R I X
E V E R Y T H I N G

The browser window has to be active though? Like if you log into banking while watch YouTube did Google get your banking credentials?

Google already has your banking credentials, sweetie.

Botnet

Use YaCy instead of google botnet.