-30% PERFORMANCE OF VMWARE

Attached: 1528222249083.png (1196x676, 1.05M)

So will this new microcode update fix most of the other vulnerabilities that have arisen since Spectre/Meltdown? And will it effect gaming performance?

Last time I had to deal with MSI support to get a BIOS update and I'm not sure how much longer they will support 4th gen.

you dont need 30% faster performance

Attached: 1527020680717.png (653x726, 84K)

Wow! A small performance hit in very niche software. It's fucking nothing.

the absolute state

DEEEELLLIIIIIIIIDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Attached: 1534595224911.png (807x867, 343K)

>Multi-core doesn't matter!
>Productivity doesn't matter!
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
>Performance per watt doesn't matter!
>Power usage doesn't matter!
>Temperatures don't matter!
>Soldered dies don't matter!
>Stutters don't matter!
>Streaming doesn't matter!
>Data centers don't matter!
>Locked CPUs don't matter!
>OEMs don't matter!
>Hyperscalers don't matter!
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!
>Anti-competitive business practices don't matter!
>Locked platform features don't matter!
>Synthetic loads don't matter!
>PCI-e lanes don't matter!
>Burnt pins don't matter!
>Heat doesn't matter!
>Server space doesn't matter!
>ECC support doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Sales don't matter!
>*NEW* 7nm doesn't matter!
>*NEW* HEDT doesn't matter!
>*NEW* StoreMI doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Security doesn't matter!
>*NEW* Stock coolers don't matter!
>*NEW* Games don't always matter!
>*NEW* Hyperthreading doesn't matter!
>*NEW* VMware doesn't matter!

>virtual machines
>very niche software
The absolute state of neo/g/

Attached: 1499458130768.jpg (612x610, 68K)

VMware runs 60% of the internet, genius

this is illegal as per the intel ToS btw

If Intel were to dissolve the moment they fucked with the law they would have dissolved in the 80s

560 EUROS = 650 BURGERS FOR 9900K LMAO

translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https://www.computerbase.de/2018-08/preis-intel-core-i9-9900k-i7-9700-euro/&edit-text=

Denuvo's VM is more like a custom bytecode interpreter, think JVM without a JIT but also obfuscated
This is completely unrelated to vmware

oy

>have server with old microcode
>buy same server with updated microcode
>never accepted the ToS
>benchmark

The ToS have no legal value and anyone can publish benchs without getting sued.
Intel also say you can't put the sticker that come with your CPU anywhere else than on a PC case with an Intel™ CPU.

>30%
>small
pffft ahahhha

>kb.vmware.com/s/article/55767
holy shit

you'll pay for this, filthy goy

>very niche software
>vmware

Attached: how_disgusting.png (783x1009, 556K)

Anything he doesn't use is niche.

Found the unemployed gaymer.

Niche??? You goddam faggot.

>virtualization
>cloud

Pick 2.

>very niche software
>i am fat, stupid, and unemployed
Yikes.

once a tech blog does a benchmark between this and an unpatched processor its going to really exploded in intels pants. 30% is such a big gap to show on a graph, to compare with their gag order.

short intel

>30%
>small
nigga you best be baiting

Attached: jsqAUyT.png (887x1097, 860K)

Goodnight cloudfags

Attached: sauce.jpg (1021x1539, 77K)

>virtualization is niche

Attached: 1520355442371.png (633x900, 114K)

They already cucked out and allowed benchmarks. This ought to be good.

>kb.vmware.com/s/article/55767

It's actually ESXi only, and it has to do with enabling a scheduler that disables a thread in software to use only 1 thread of a core.

Also it has little to no impact on performance, 30% is a worst case scenario with two threads under 100% load. Thing is, nobody runs VM's with a single core and loads them fully so it literally doesn't matter.

Based. Keep collecting

ESXi with experimental security schedulers enabled is most certainly niche, I doubt anyone here uses that shit.

Holy shit, you're retarded. Never post again.

t. vmware admin

>my server now has a lot less cpu shares, but that doesn't matter. It can't possibly affect performance because why would I ever fully load a server?

The point is that full mitigation of these vulnerabilities requires this "experimental scheduler". Disabling HT isn't all that experimental though.

And now each VM will have half the vCPUs and will see a 30% reduction in computing capacity. Sure, not everyone loads their hardware 100%, but it's also not like it behaves exactly the same until you reach 70% capacity, at which point it starts performing poorly. This will affect performance for anyone for which this scheduler is enabled, it's up to the administrators whether they value the performance enough to forgo the full mitigation.

no no NO
FUCKING DELET THIS RIGHT NOW

Think about it, do you ACTUALLY need 30% of even more frames and rendering. Thats right, you dont.

You're right Intel poster, I don't.
Thanks for making my mind up on buying a Ryzen 2600X
You've been a real sport.

> Sure, not everyone loads their hardware 100%
>not everyone

if you're running at 100% load you are retarded and a horrible manager of resources.

Oh look. This fucking tripfag is back again. kys

this absolutely smokes donkey ass. I'm in the market for a laptop and now my only option is ryzen mobile whose market is filled with subpar options for one reason or another :/

I actually set up my resources to be about 150% of the hardware. In fact, almost everyone overstacks their resources. If you don't do this, you're an idiot.

It's done this way because not every vm will go balls out at once, and if someone decides to be a cheeky cunt for an extended time, it load balances them to a different server.

Just buy more cores, goy.