This CPU can do anything yours can, only faster

>single core
What is this, 2005?

reminder that your 8700k is insecure if you don't disable HT. reconsider your question.

Mine doesn't burn though

Attached: 1532757356154.jpg (1032x774, 273K)

Single core is all that really matters in most heavy computation

>muh single core
didn't know we were still in 2004

Attached: 1526484106515.png (1300x2000, 307K)

Only if you're retarded

NOOOOOOO *PFFFFFSSSSCHHHHHTTTTT*

Attached: 1503848584264.jpg (1000x1000, 253K)

kill yourself, intel shill.

If we're going to construct such a ridiculous benchmark, then my requirement is that all security patches/mitigations have been applied (no HT!) and a kernel interrupt heavy workload is part of the test.

I don't want people to think I'm poor

Seething clocklet amdrone.

The only poor people are those who went long on Intel instead of AMD this year. I'm enjoying my comfy 2x.

>single core
>no HT
do you ever listen to yourself and think, jesus i'm an idiot

Yes. My CPU is a core2duo from 2007. I've been using it over 10 years now and I still can't be bothered to upgrade.

Are you using software that is written in or utilizes bytecode or interpreted languages? Then you need single core performance.

Sounds like a comfy CPU

Attached: 1534737506611.png (915x678, 188K)

That burning stash of cash looks like weed buds on fire from afar.

i have a 6700k, eat my cock. intel is shit

Attached: a3d3f44a98590d95.jpg (853x739, 138K)

I didn't specify the kernel interrupt bench should be single thread. What the fuck is single threaded these days anyway? Basically everything I write parallelizes around CPU heavy work. Even /v/edditors have to accept their gayems are all using 2-4 cores now.

>blah blah, blah blah blah
"No."

Attached: you4.png (800x1150, 207K)

I can everything this CPU can, only slower. Give me a few million years while I compute these strings on paper.

>attempting to put yourself on the same level as based Saitama
shut the frick up!

Apparently only AoS and Crysis3 benefit from core bloat.
Everything else is still programmed too ineptly to even consider multi-thread performance over single thread performance.

8350k oc to 5.5 on air and 5.8ghz on water costs more than half price and no game requires more than 4cores to get optimal fps even dx12 game unless you have 1080ti or 2080.

if you don't play on having a 700$ gpu in next 5 years no point to go above 8350k (4core i3).
by the time you need 6+core and 8+thread there will be much faster cpu.

pretty sure it takes longer to delid and apply solder than it does to just have it shipped already soldered

Benchmarking a single core task is like testing a soldier by how well they play golf. The real world isn't a nice quiet environment where you have plenty of time to line up a shot. A real workload will have one or two CPU intensive applications running, and several low to medium usage applications with the occasional spike. Then if you're a Microcuck suddenly some system task decides to eat an entire core for several minutes for seemingly no reason.

Real workloads just aren't the same as crunching pi with absolutely nothing else running.

Go ahead, parallelize draw calls.

But I use that exact model of CPU?

8700K can reach 5.3GHz and the 2990WX can reach 4.4GHz tops. There's no competition

But can it run 8086 instructions?

>140w
That's nothin kiddo

Attached: gigawatt.png (1281x720, 491K)

>4.4GHz on a smartphone node
>5.3GHz on a extremely refined high performance node

Attached: 1534464855265.jpg (989x1024, 151K)

I used to think 2core was fine. yet some games where programed bad or had drm that made 4coure a little better.

the DX12 patches to metro and tomb raider and gear4 and witcher actually do show than 6core/8thread helps with 1080ti/titan performance but not much els.

basically if you got a 1060 you don't have to worry about multicore till the mid range cards get more powerful in 2025 or some thing.

even then these dx12 games are just singleplayer games so its is sorta true that you don't need more than a 2/4core for optimal fps in 100% of compedative games. and they don't even make 2core any more 8th gen i3 are 4core.

im on a 7600k and I think ill still keep using it until I get a high end gpu or get a mid range in 2025 that might actually make use of it.

basically intel has been selling multicore gpus for 15 years and its helped 0 in games and only now helps in fringe cases when you have a 700$+ gpu.. and even then the benchmarks could be fake and the review rigs could have 1/2 pcie ssd or nvme in the wrong slot on them making the cards run at 8x on lower core cpu instead of 16x.

honestly still doubtful that multicore is a thing but there are afue reviews that show this with dx12/1080ti but then again all thous reviewers get send tens of thousands of dollars of product form intel and I wouldn't be suprized if intel told them to put the nvme in the wrong slot to use up the pcie lanes to fuck up lower core cpus.

more research required.

intel is a dog.

Can it reach 100c at stock clock?

7980XE here

DELID

2990WX is not a smartphone CPU

I don't think so

He probably used some insane voltage like 1.4V under load. 1.2V under load is enough to run 2990WX at 4GHz and it burns around 550W

Can it encode video faster than TR?

Attached: 1514641055602.png (1863x1540, 232K)

Actually I see he's citing total system consumption. nvm

>best binned cpu
>stop talking about real world performance, let's talk about 1 of my core vs 1 of your core
This type of kikery is as stupid as those russian fags spamming "1 het 1" in dota.

jokes on you i have a 8086k

AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

> interpreted languages

No thanks.

Try looking for gaming benchmarks made after 2006.

Currently 8 threads is the best, but newer games are already shifting to 16 threads.

You're using one right now.

No one will think that you're poor. Most people will just think that you are easily mislead, and unemployed with no real reason to have a computer though.

that's bullshit the only games that show performance gain with over 2 cores are DX12 games and 6cores or 8/threads is optimal any more than that and you get like 1fps more.

stop spreading misinformation because you brought some thing 20years ahead of time.

and there is literally no dx12 multiplayer games so for basically for 100% of games people play regularly and care about fps for multicore makes 0 difference.

and even then that's only for 1080ti. if you have a 1060 or 1070 or vega 64 multicore makes 0 difference.

I've seen some dumb ass posts but this is the top.

Huh, that doesn't look like an IBM Power 9 to me...

Attached: ibm-power9-features-and-specifications-5-638.jpg (638x493, 84K)

>*is vulnerable*

I'll stick to my comfy 2700x and whatever 7nm I on the menu for next year.

>2% faster
>22% pricier

>t. retard who can't implement multithreading support

Attached: aivo_aukko.jpg (1218x1015, 212K)

that's why supercomputers have thousands of cpu cores and gpus?

They use all of their cpu cores to simulate one massive single core cpu

Do you even know what HT is, mouthbreather?

it's funny you mention it because intel only provides more frames if you have a 1080TI

It can be exploited, only faster

Does it hurt?

Attached: 3ed992f3f6d6072614055d7b413361b54fedc95856c778db4cf6a5f7456b41ca.jpg (571x407, 26K)

You do understand that people use computers for work? Who gives a fuck about FPS other than gaymur manchildren

Attached: 241081.jpg (866x1300, 235K)

Any serious computation is multithreaded. Stop being a retard

literally no, it cannot even get close. sorry shill

holy fuck this has to be bait
i don't know if you can be this dumb

Can it update it's BIOS without making it worse than it's 2012 equivalent?

Yeah, it loses performance pretty fast, nothing else even comes close.

>Measuring CPU performances based on clock only
The absolute state of Jow Forums

It certainly can get exploited faster

yeah, I'll stick with my 5GHz 5960X

Literally any computation has a single-threaded path.

What if you want to have security?

Attached: INTURD.jpg (792x2140, 481K)

Can it shitpost?

I have a mac
It just works

is it secure?

I don't see the reason to switch from my 4960x. At least, not yet.

is 5820k still gud?

>No 6c/12t
y tho

Attached: beans.jpg (680x907, 42K)

I don't see why not. I also happen to use 3770(so 4960x minus two cores and soldering) at work, and I yet to bottleneck myself in the processor department, despite frequently going into swap with 32 Gb of ram.

You're the one spreading misinformation.
The gap between 4/4 i5 and 4/8 is big even on dx11 games.
Stop trolling and throw away that crappy overclocked i5.

It definitely can show more design flaws and security holes faster than mine can, i give you that OP

*as long as vital security updates aren't installed

>This CPU can do anything yours can, only hotter.

ftfy

>i7 can cause a BSOD faster

Can it not give my information to heebs?

Attached: amd_fx8350_8_core_cpu_1504700744_6b25d1e40.jpg (826x818, 172K)

not really, unless you delid it