AMD-praising and shit

Because intel was acting like nvidia is now. AMD bent them over, so everyone is cheering that the under dog finally took a chunk out of the old king.

If you run it at 4.25 GHz it should hit 500 singlethread

Its also amazingly efficient, imagine this is beating a 5960X at 100W on a cheap mobo
You can build a cheap rendering HTPC nowadays
I wish AMD made a Ryzen for GPUs. I heard they are experimenting with multi chip modules but its much harder to make a GPU with this design. If they manage it they may comeback. Otherwise I will be forced to suck the leatherjacketmans 1300 € cock

or stop playing 2019s games, because nothing good releases nowadays
I play Settlers 3 on a 1080 Ti

Attached: ryzen.jpg (814x808, 145K)

>supercomputers
>running x86
lmao

Nice numbers. How do you think how long it will take for big companies to start buying AMD-based machines in bulk (for workers)?

They did, shills just pretend it isn't as good as it actually is. Mine is sitting squarely between a 1080 and 1080ti, being closer to a 1080ti in reality, especially with an undervolt.

Attached: nitroplus64large.png (1024x1024, 740K)

Its not. Vega is similar to a 1080, but never reached a reasonable price. It cost the same as a 1080 Ti.

I have a Ti for my 4K rig, it barely suffices. I may even buy the 2080 Ti if it performs well in DX11 (4K90).

On the other hand I have a RX 480 and hope for the 680 next year, it could be a great HTPC lowend 4K card I use in my other PC. But it will never reach the high end. The RX680 may reach a 1080/Vega64 for 200 €, but then the NVIDIA highend will already be twice as powerful.

The Nitro+ looks pretty nice though. Sapphire=best AMD brand

...lol? I paid $599 for this sapphire nitro+ vega 64 on amazon, a 1080ti at the same time was $850+, while a 1080 was well above $500.

Considering the performance level it's well beyond its price point. Now that you can get a used 1080ti for $500 it's kind of silly to buy one, but as far as new prices pre-2080 news, it was competitive.

When was that? My FTW3 cost 879 € shortly after release. I'm not sure if Vega was released then but last year was miner hype, Vegas were sold out and if you could get one 900+ €.

I bought a 1070 in 2016 for 420 € which I considered expensive, but later sold it for 650 at the peak of the miner madness when GDDRX cards were still unaffected. Great deal.

I don't regret anything, because you pay for performance at a time. If the new Ti can run titles like Witcher 3 in 90 FPS I will buy it, even for 1300 €. The 1080 Ti opened up new dimensions for me, before I had to play on medium and with framedrops. Then I would be able to experience beyond 60 Hz if a proper monitor releases. Otherwise I can be glad I have my 1080 Ti, if RTX turns out shit I can skip it.

About 2 months ago.

OP is a retard who wasn't around for the faildozer memefaggotry when AMD fanboys were coping with the loss and Intelshits were gloating like Satan spitroasting a whore.

Same here I bought vega 56 cheaper than 1070 was back then. Also got a headset with it for free which I sold for ~$70. Really good deal imo.

>I wish AMD made a Ryzen for GPUs. I heard they are experimenting with multi chip modules but its much harder to make a GPU with this design.
it's not excessively difficult to make, but requires ridiculous amounts of work on the software side since that's what GPUs work through and RTG obviously doesn't have the funds and time to do that
we'll have to hope for a breakthrough on the hardware side to come out of nowhere at this point

>...out of nowhere...
>amd releases product that blows intell out ofwatter
>bunch of vulns found in intel
are you stupid?

>payed

I think the products are being praised because they are actually great. Great performance, great prices, free software support. If you want to talk about misspent money, look at Intel who could only respond to Ryzen and MELTDOWN with shitposting. I will forever be grateful to AMD for saving us from the shitty future that Intel had for us, and also that shitty blob Nvidya driver.

UMA
M
A

Attached: 1520358777245.png (253x239, 84K)

We did it back when Athlon came out, because they killed Intel on clock speed and price/performance (before multicore mattered). Intel had a surprise hit (a lucky accident, I'd say) with the Core architecture, and the rest is history.

We never would have switched back to Intel if AMD hadn't failed, and the Xeon 5100 series put AMD to bed for anything work-related. We're back because AMD is back. Everyone has been waiting over a decade for Intel to fail. It all makes sense. Go to Internet archive and look for posts about Athlon adoption back then. Any gamer worth a shit had an AMD CPU back then.

you mean like Intel did since forever? why shouldn't AMD promote its product when it currently has the better product?

You mean Intel dug up a dead arch, updated it to the latest process and cut a ton of security out of it to gain performance. The rest is history.

AMD earned the praise. They went from having pretty much nothing to compete with Intel's offerings to having a pretty damn good processor line up which immediately put pressure on Intel to release some good processors at a decent price point. Also you can probably thank Ryzen for the Intel processor refresh with soldered IHS. Threadripper 1950x is what $400 now? That's fucking killer

Maybe it's not shilling and are just praising the better product?

2700x costs 330usd 9900k will cost 430usd

yet a decent 2700x motherboard costs 150+usd and 9900k will run on any 0-30$ z170 motherboard and there are many with good VRM.

so ultimately intel 8c/16t will be cheaper.

all you have to do is pencil mod the cpu and cut 2 pins on z170 board and install a custom bios.

Attached: 8700k z170 use msi for oc n bios mod.jpg (1015x1024, 362K)

Why do you want to make a home made nuclear explosion device?

its still 95w but please spend 200$ more on the amd option even thou 3700x will even perform worse than a 9900k.

AMD is being praised because they did everything Intel does but better

Because the 7nm tech is coming out soon. I'm sure of it

Why do you need 200bux motherboard on AMD?

>the Incel shill is back at it again

Attached: 1534973228901.png (287x464, 187K)

because a 30$ one can overclock a 9900k to 5ghz but you need a 150+ usd one to overclock at 2700x

ok intel is only about 100$ cheaper if you live in a place where you don't have to pay shipping and 50$ cheaper if you do but its still cheaper. you can also get z270 boards and do same mod for about 50$.

i7-8700k is $320 and 2700x is $270 right now. Incel is slightly more expensive even factoring in Ryzen's fast memory requirement but you get better overall and much better single thread performance. I think AMD has done well to catch up in performance/price realm. Whether they offer something better is still up for debate.

Should I get an i5 8400 or an R5 2600?

Which one should I get? I don't know.

>Using a 10 dollar Z170 motherboard with IED tier VRMs ready to explode with an 8 core housefire.
OH NO NO NO NO AHAHAHAH THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF INTEL SHILLS

Nobody shills for AMD GPUs though, it's why Nvidia has a literal monopoly in the consumer GPU market now.

Do you use your PC to play video games or model complex financial systems?

why are only the k series allowed to overclock?

Video games. But I also handle audio production software, Photoshop/Illustrator, some video editing and streaming video.

So suddenly price matters to Incel shills huh

>its still 95w
>5ghz
?

Because non-Ks are probably gonna get you minimal OC anyway.

Underdogs are always rooted for.

It's """"95w"""""(300w)

>30$ motherboard with 8 core CPU
Go be a retard somewhere else.

You realize overclocking throws TDP out the window right? A 5GHz 8700K is NOT 95W.

Here's your (You)

I'd plump for the 2600X
Those extra threads will help your video editing, and odds are you'll be limited by your GPU in games anyway

I am convinced this is an AMD false flag to start literal Intel housefires.

where do you get a 2700x for 270$ bro. best price on ebay with no returns is from some hongkong chink for 330 and 30 shipping. I expect most retail stores in US sell it for 350 or some thing.

your just sad you spend 200usd on your ryzen7 mobo. there are plenty of 30$ z170 or z270 motherboards with VRM good enough to hit 5ghs on 9900k. no one wants thous motherboards any more but its easy to mod to make the i9 work.

Is this bait?

AMD shills have been here since late 2016 when they started shilling Ryzen and Intel shills were shilling the 6700k.

Watch them shut the fuck up when Intel shills show up in like a month or two.

how exactly does current deflated market price of motherboard effect temps?

"OK" is a huge step forward for AMD if you're comparing them with current-gen Intel, considering that for the whole time they were pumping out Bulldozer chips it wasn't even worth considering.

>no one wants thous motherboards any more but its easy to mod to make the i9 work.
Why are you blatantly making shit up? The CPUs aren't even out yet.

>Watch them shut the fuck up when Intel shills show up in like a month or two.
9900K is a literal joke, it's going to be well over $600 on launch.

>, that the only way to compete is to create a shitload of praising of their products (payed of course)?
They worked for it and actually deserve it.
Have you even seen all the fake shit Intel has done in desperation.

You can get X370 boards for almost as cheap as Z170. You don't need X470 to run a 2600 or 2700 as long as the BIOS is flashed. (Just ask AMD for a bootkit)

>implying 30$ z170 is decent enough

Micro Center

I own a 7850k apu and got my hands or only a day on a 2400g.
I'll post imptessions, i am installing debian and then games from steam.
I get roughly 22 fps on rust lowest settings on the old one and 40-50 on 7/10 settings on dota2 w/ vulkan.
I can't run skyrim on loonix and setting wine would take away time from gaymen... So yeah brb in 2-3 hours with results

/thread
OP is probably a faggot too.

What a misleading bargraph. It makes tiny differences seem huge.

AMD currently is the more interesting party as their CPUs are better priced compared to their counterparts.
Not to mention that AMD is ahead with their almost done 7nm process compared to Intel that is stuck at 12nm for a while.

Add to that the recent Intel CPU flaws hat came to light, Meltdown, Spectre 1 to what, 5?

And add to that the work AMD puts into their Linux GPU drivers compared to Nvidia and their proprietary non cooperating bullshit.

Attached: ayymd.jpg (1920x1080, 242K)

Vega 64 has lots of problems but power an't one of them.
It is closer to 1080ti then it is to a 1080.

>I dont know what happened

Ryzen + 50 Intel CPU security exploits happened. Not complicated.

>It is closer to 1080ti then it is to a 1080
????

Attached: 1080vega.png (1240x698, 220K)

yeah obviously amd realised that shilling is the way to go

nothing to do with the fact that it provides better perf on 99% of everything
its literally colder
it consumes less energy
it costs less
gives you 8 cores for 300 bucks while a year ago 6 intel cores were at 1000 bucks...

no...nothing to do with that

>Z170 +Z270 don't even support the 8000 series yeah you think they will support the 9000 series

user what the fuck?

Go buy a new z390 good goy.

you draw some pencil on cpu and install a new bios and it works.

show me a 30$ x370 and also consider lots of people have z170 boards laying around from builds 4 years ago they are basically free.

I have an x370 board laying around from a build last year, it's basically free.

no its not 8700k is 400euro or 300usd
9900k is confirmed 530euro

you don't just convert the currency because 400euro is not 300usd. by that ratio 9900k will be 390$

You look at this guy and tell me there are no intel shills here.

It's $380 new, you can only find it for $300 used or on sale.Also don't forget Ringbus scales like shit and has poor yields, that's literally the entire fucking reason Intel switched to their new mesh arch for Skylake-X. Remeber how their old HEDT shit like LGA 2011 and 2011-v3 got astronomically more expensive as you increased cores? Not to mention if it's soldered that gives Intel another excuse to jack up the price as well.

gnd-tech.com/2018/08/core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-and-9600k-pricing-and-specs-revealed/
>Intel Core i5 9600K – $348 USD (€299)
>Intel Core i7 9700K – $659 USD (€567)
>Intel Core i9 9900K – $852 USD (€732)
New Coffee Lake is a literal joke.

maybe because Intel legitimately sucks at making CPUs

One thing I read was that Navi is coming out this year. It was an update on wccftechs article about AMD SVP Jim Anderson leaving.

7nm Update

For the past several years we consistently executed our multi-generational, leadership product and architectural roadmap across our CPU and GPU portfolio. Our upcoming 7nm product portfolio represents the next major milestone for AMD computing and graphics leadership, including our second generation “Zen 2” CPU core and our new “Navi” GPU architecture. We have already taped out multiple 7nm products at TSMC, including our first 7nm GPU that is planned to launch later this year, and our first 7nm server CPU that we have sampled to strategic customers and plan to launch in 2019.

Everyone is praising Ryzen because it's that good. Almost no one is praising their GPUs, since Vega was not that great.

the thing is thou going down nm doesn't increase the jump in performance its still 10% every year on cpu and 20% every 2 years on gpu.

3700x 7nm is going to be worse than 14nm 9900k.

amd is fin. they changed manufacture to slow their decent into bankruptcy not to speed things up.

They're referring to 7nm Vega which is a workstation-only part. I'm interested to see someone benchmark the highest end 7nm Radeon Pro in games though, could have interesting results.

>gnd-tech.com/2018/08/core-i9-9900k-i7-9700k-and-9600k-pricing-and-specs-revealed/
thous prices are from some retarded german or eastern europian site. thous countries literally tax forign tech like 40%.

8700k is 400euro and 300usd

9900k is 530euro and 400usd.

just cry more.

>3700x 7nm is going to be worse than 14nm 9900k.
Doesn't matter, ringbus is a technological dead end and Intel knows it. Right now only their HEDT is mesh, but when Intel hits 7nm (if they ever do at this rate anyway) it's likely they'll switch their entire line to some sort of modular design similar to Ryzen. Ringbus scales extremely poorly, and if AMD keep increasing core counts to ludicrous amounts eventually Intel will have to seriously change things up. or die.

Post source or GTFO.

Nah fuck that. We aren't associating AMD with that bullshit. It's actually trying to change the common thought of "I will buy Intel because it's better". I am so glad there is finally some competition in the CPU market in terms of price/performance.

KEK

>Intel release 4 gens of Skylake
>Even then Skylake is basically Sandy Bridge with more IPC and a smaller node
>There are people that still defend Intel even though they haven't released an interesting new product since 2011

Almost every game in that comparison has GimpWorks™ and ((optimisation)) for Nvidia's GPUs.

Attached: post-91546-1528969420_thumb.jpg (345x400, 22K)

You retarded? TSMC has the top quality regarding '7nm', which will clearly beat Intel's '10nm'. My only worry is whether they will release on schedule.

>3700x 7nm is going to be worse than 14nm 9900k.
You can't possibly know that.

Also, if the price leaks are right, the i9 will actually be competing with Threadripper.

>Intel Core i9 9900K – $852 USD (€732)
AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH

IT'S OVER INTLEL IS FINISHED

Attached: 1464545892551.gif (300x300, 192K)