which one is the most usable, resource efficient DE for linux?
So now
emacs
emacs
KDE
distro hopping is healthy as it teaches you what's common and what isn't
trinity DE, i cant tell you how fucking amazing it is. youll just have to try it for yourself. thank me later, when my wife is not around. > - o
you have to be joking
never heard of it
XFCE (and compton)
SystemD
yes I'm actually not joking
emacs as de and wm
emacs as
>wm
>de
>os
>kernel
>bootloader
>bios
>peripherals
>cpu
Not even joking you have to try it
openbsd with cwm
LXDE
I kind of want to switch back to Ubuntu now that they are using gnome but there is too much important stuff stored in my computer. To answer your question though, I think LXDE perhaps. Very Windowsesque at the same time very lightweight.
>create a separate partition
>install ubuntu
>transfer stuff from current install on to ubuntu partition
>????
>you zeroed out your entire disk
use i3wm
after using it for a long time its hard for me to use anything else that doesnt have all the keybinds and also desktops
too lazy to configure the shit out of wms
i3wm doesnt require any configuration except for adding 'exec i3' to the end of your .xinitrc file
Now this is epic
>usable
gnome
>resource efficient
not gnome
i3wm / xfce
Windows.
i3wm, XFCE or MATE
i legit like cinnamon
wouldn't recommend for toasters but damn it's comfy
How did you managed to install it? On debian I can't add key used to sign packages in repos.
user@anon:~$ sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.quickbuild.io --recv-keys F5CFC95C
Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.tJuJlHhimO/gpg.1.sh --keyserver keyserver.quickbuild.io --recv-keys F5CFC95C
gpg: keyserver receive failed: Server indicated a failure
>inb4 change key server
Already tried does not work, key not fund elsewhere. Should I just compile?
emacs as vm for templeOS
>install ubuntu
>copy important stuff from backup
It's not hard user.
now that's a dilemma
cinnamon seems comfy actually
but it seems like a resource hog (liberal use of python, based on gnome, etc etc)
At that point, you might as well use KDE.
LXQt, hands down. It truly maximizes the usability/efficiency ratio more than any other desktop environment.
Can you use Emacs as init?
>implying I will ever regret Arch
not in a milion years baby.
Also, to answer your question: i3
i3
I think you meant Sway.