Simple, clean, elegant, fast; Linux lacks these, which makes it trash

Simple, clean, elegant, fast; Apple lacks these, which makes it trash

Attached: xfce2-5806ec9f3df78cbc28aa61d0.png (768x432, 80K)

>gnome

Attached: 1536551083014.gif (500x491, 376K)

why do they put a fake bottom dock tho

Yeah, the mouse is pretty good wm.
Apple is less work though, just *crack* *sip*

Boiiiiii

Attached: 3420432D-6EF9-4484-992E-3982C443C179.gif (320x240, 1.85M)

>window snapping
bettertouchtool did that years ago before they sold out

Yeah but it's a third-party tool. Seems like a pretty obvious thing for Apple to Sherlock by baking it into the OS, but my guess is there's some vague patent covering it that they're afraid to infringe upon.

>what is openbox

literally the lead dev of gnome uses a mac and has turned his back on linux.

tirania.org/blog/archive/2013/Mar-05.html

Try again

Attached: Windows-XP-Gold-SP3-Full-ISO-Drivers-v2.0-Download.jpg (640x361, 147K)

Is this Trump OS?

nigger pimp os

Yes, what I said.

your shitty os will never look this good

Attached: mojave-boom-bleed.jpg (2048x1280, 666K)

>having icons on the desktop

Wow, is this 1998?

Nor will it be as useful.

>mfw I tried to set custom app shortcuts in Wangblows

Deepin is exactly that.

that looks like shit to me.
>icons everywhere
>wasted space
>that disgusting dock at the bottom
literally end yourself

Attached: 1512876774462.png (1600x900, 1.12M)

What?

They can all be hidden if you’re too cool for them.

>no thumbnails

?

Attached: 1534480024620.png (1600x900, 310K)

that's no thumbnail, noob.

>Arch Linux
>not CloverOS
Try CloverOS and truly A S C E N D!

Attached: barelyworksonanything.png (1366x768, 366K)

letting some random from Jow Forums compile your packages for you
no thanks
theyre just really smol

Attached: 1506894127070.png (1600x900, 443K)

tmux a shit

Attached: thumbnail_example_cropped.gif (616x493, 76K)

my bad, I underestimated your powerlevel

I think apple makes their products too thin and they have some performance issues.

Linux is the best desu.

It just needs a UI.

why the fuck does every linux screenshot look like utter shit
even the regurgitated powerpoint crap in win10 looks better

please don't compare me to that retard running default 4chanOS
My linux is beautiful just the way I like it

UI development/design is very fragmented in Linux.

CloverOS > Arch

Gentoo >> Arch >>>>>>> Clover OS

It's not FOSS, and in the future will only run on apple hardware.

Kill yourself you consumeritard.

I disagree because CloverOS is from Jow Forums and it is just an install script for Gentoo with some choices made for the user.

I disagree because not only is it a precompiled kernel by some untrustworthy random from Jow Forums, it is also preconfigured to use a binhost by the same untrustworthy random from Jow Forums.

If you install cloverOS, compile a new kernel, and change the make.conf back to standard gentoo repos, it is an acceptable OS

arch defaults to binary kernels + packages iirc
I trust user more than Arch devs
I've also had both fail to initiate the install process on bare metal, so I can't really pick sides (although Arch failed to even bring up a UI where CloverOS just failed to recognize my input device).

>I trust user more than Arch devs
then you are a fool

I have installed cloverOS on my thindpad before, but after realizing the potential risks it is now running devuan

Attached: perfect-OS-for-yous.jpg (1920x1080, 74K)

I don't even use Linux on my desktop. Rocking Windows 10. Always trust user. We are legion.

Attached: image_3 (2).jpg (640x480, 98K)

>now running devuan
you mean the distro developed by guys that merely copy Debian packages and couldn't even update their cert?
yeah, such a trustful distro

CloverOS == Gentoo + binary packages

In contrast to letting some random from not-in-Jow Forums compile your packages?

maybe if you were to compile those packages on your own machine and have your own binhost

It has to be a botnet if you guys are shilling it this hard

why the fuck have the file dialog tiled?

maybe my machine will burn if I compile everything

>he doesn't have more than one computer
just compile on your desktop and install the binaries on your thonkpad, retard

>Simple, clean, elegant, fast
>but dont do anything cpu intensive or you'll set the house on fire

>press login twice
>Am now root
there is no defending this

Attached: macos-root-login-bug.jpg (555x344, 23K)

osxdaily.com/2017/11/28/macos-high-sierra-root-login-without-password-bug/

what's the point in that?
I'll still lose any performance gains on thinkpad where it matters

How bout dat dere screen tearing

you really don't know how the guy who does CloverOS does it, do you?
I think you need to read the gentoo wiki on portage

>that zoomer putting an emoji everywhere

Attached: 18.09.13-09.19_sel_maim.png (636x426, 122K)

Devuan looks nice
Might try it with s6 init.
hush up.
I'm really skeptical that modern compilers take very efficient pathways in constructing binaries.

I'm considering my foray into finding a good png compressor. I've settled on pingo. It compresses PNGs in 10 seconds (losslessly) just as well as optiPNG did taking a minute. I had to do some research and dig through benchmarks to even find out about pingo.

TinyC compiles the Linux kernel in about the 1/10 the time GCC did (wild guess)

bellard.org/tcc/tccboot.html
> TCCBOOT is only 138 KB big (uncompressed code) and it can compile and run a typical Linux kernel in less than 15 seconds on a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4.

granted it didn't funroll-all-loops
you can target the architecture of your thinkpad with your Gentoo compile server and get all your optimizations.

>red herring so obviously
you could have at least tried

Drumpf btfo

it's not a red herring read what wrote and then search "gentoo binhost" on the internet

as we understand it you can target your Thinkpad with your desktop rig. You might even be able to cross compile. Either way not a lot of effort has been put into making compilers compile faster. Most of the effort goes into making the binaries run well.
how does CloverOS guy do it? curious
the website still seems to be under construction...
css-ig.net/pingo

so UH
PRODUCTIVE THREAD GUYS.

I find Linux to be simple, clean, and fast but it can be said to lack a certain elegance.
: (

Attached: sold_green.jpg (266x1066, 118K)

>how does CloverOS guy do it?
exactly as you're describing. He targets a "generic" architecture for his compiler and compiles the packages into binaries using quickpkg. He wrote about it somewhere on either the website or gitgud.io

Why not have both? The other day I installed a pirated copy of High Sierra in a VM on a Debian host on my ThinkPad.

sounds lame but fun

did you enabled gpu passthrough tho

so pretty much like any other binary distro but with portage.

>elegance
In what way? Technical?

sure
many binary distros even start with portage/gentoo before they develop their own package manager

The Complete Package™ isn't really ready or made.

ubuntu

Ubuntu is gross.

well since you seem to have a specific taste, a "complete package" wouldn't work for you, would it?
That's actually part of the beauty and elegance of linux, there is no one set way that you need to set up your system.

maybe we have differing perspectives on what is elegant.
Ubuntu departs from the philosophy you've described more than any other distro I've used.

I think we agree at least on your last statement
>I find Linux to be simple, clean, and fast but it can be said to lack a certain elegance.
>The Complete Package™ isn't really ready or made.
This leads me to believe that you would find Ubuntu, the most polished and consumer ready distro, the most elegant. No?

>tha guy has also made ffmpeg, QEMU and TinyGL
How does someone becomes that good?

Attached: Screenshot_2018-09-13 Fabrice Bellard's Home Page.png (1159x716, 88K)

simple, clean, elegant, fast. MacOS lacks these, which makes it trash

Attached: simple.jpg (3840x1080, 174K)

Except that macos have no decent package manager

Ubuntu fails to attain elegance because once you actually try to use it, the facade falls down on its face and you realize it's sugar coated and watered down.

An elegant system is one that doesn't require direct oversight from the user when setting up. It responds to input and can be heavily tuned, but this degree of tweaking isn't something I want to waste time or thought on usually.

I can assume dedication and talent. I'm sure he strongly believes in freedoms also. Try shooting him an email. I'm sure he's personable.

Free admin access is the best feature on macos

POO

Attached: 1525169165687.jpg (643x960, 256K)

>inb4 you are fabrice

Tbh I appreciate brainlets being attracted to macos.
MacOS is to Linux what Jupiter is to the Earth, attracting all the asteroids preventing them to smash the earth too often

>simpleminded
>for full-time toilet cleaners
>elegant and flamboyant
>not fast

>period after end quote

Attached: garbage man.webm (1280x544, 660K)

Wasn't that a beta only bug?

Where do I get the rest of the set

Attached: 1464278297942.jpg (4841x2949, 3.75M)

fagOS is a perpetual beta

Attached: 1510404309054.png (1013x1184, 106K)

>doesn't run Linux on a RISC-V emulator on his web browser
>doesn't use comfy Fluxbox, Dillo and Qemacs

Attached: 18.09.13-10.39_maim.png (1366x768, 77K)

>doesn't run a RISC-V 128 emulator on busybox/Linux on a RISC-V 64 emulator on a web browser running on GNU/Linux on an outdated x64 Intel™

Attached: 18.09.13-10.45_maim.png (1366x768, 116K)

as if there is any OS that is relatable now thats not chromeOS

Attached: Screenshot 2018-09-13 at 11.41.34.png (1366x768, 429K)

> terrible icons
> dock copied from osx but works in a worse way (no previews / pings / smooth animations)

> good color combination
> no quick start of applications
> no close / minimize buttons
> no padding on menus / looks buggy
> bad icons
> ugly / unantialiased font
> unproductive / 10 (you surely don't work with that)

> not even commenting ... -2/10

> stuck in early 1990, my first pc in 1996 looked better (no joke)

finally a competitor that worth noticing, although ChromeOS is a worse osx with less software (but aesthetically pleasant judging by screenshot)

hey, at least it can render fonts in 2018

have you heard about crostini?