Imagine 2 x86 cores and then on top of that Intel Management Engine Absolute state of iSheeps
Samuel Johnson
she's
she's 22 baka
Owen Roberts
double the cores, double the failure... will it be able to compete with the QC modem, or apple will have to throttle the QC modem again?
Jeremiah Sanchez
The Quark uses cores that are based on the i586, so it is entirely possible. One hell of a die shrink.
Henry Hernandez
>One hell of a die shrink. Intel Quark SoC X1000 contains a bug #71538[12] that "under specific circumstances" results in a type of crash known as a segfault. The workaround implemented by Intel is to omit in the compiled code LOCK prefixes not required on single threaded processors.[13] While source-based embedded systems like those built using the Yocto Project can incorporate this workaround at compile time, general purpose Linux distributions such as Debian are deeply affected by the bug. Such a workaround is not easy to implement in binaries meant to support multithreading too as they require LOCK prefixes to function properly.[14]
you mean, one shit of a Core.
Benjamin Gutierrez
Pretty sure that Apple engineer know better than you
Anthony Kelly
My waifu
Justin Moore
>Intel Quark SoC X1000 contains a bug #71538[12] that "under specific circumstances" results in a type of crash known as a segfault. Which other range of CPUs have this problem? Oh Ryzen
>having your modem vulnerable to Meltdown, Spectre, Intel ME bugs >having n side channels on your new iphone WPA3 dead on arrival; obsolete by Brian Krzanich
William Garcia
call me when intel actually make a modem that doesnt thermally throttles down
ill wait
Nathaniel Murphy
why the shit would a modem include ME? do you even know what ME is?
Parker Morales
The average amdtard thinks that intel's botnet is on the cpu die like amd's psp.
Camden Wright
that's beside my point having an x86 core doesn't mean it has ME, ME isn't part of x86