How do you install runit on Devuan?

How do you install runit on Devuan?

Only options are SysV and OpenRC during installation. There's no documentation to make runit work on Devuan.

Attached: 20180914_081544.jpg (3264x1836, 1.51M)

Other urls found in this thread:

serverfault.com/questions/755818/systemd-using-4gb-ram-after-18-days-of-uptime
phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=systemd-2017-Git-Activity
suckless.org/sucks/systemd
web.archive.org/web/20170724100245/https://muchweb.me/systemd-nsa-attempt/
without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd
wiki.voidlinux.eu/Runit
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Operating_systems_used_on_top_500_supercomputers.svg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

systemd™ does not have this problem

runit website had '''some''' info and it was debian iirc but you still need to write some files to basically tell it what to do

How do you install systemd on Devuan?

Install Debian.

SystemDachau is the problem, retard.

>SystemDachau
don't make fun of Dachau, it had a purpose and did its job well, unlike systemD

if you want runit just use void, it would be less hassle even if you agree with devuan philosophy more or whatever

There's a LOT of reasons why people don't like it, and I think the people who don't like it all likely have their own reasons for not liking it.

Here's a posting about someone discovering a massive memory leak that used up 4GB of ram. While I have yet to see something this massive, I have definitely noticed Systemd using more memory than the alternatives, and some leakage here and there as well.
serverfault.com/questions/755818/systemd-using-4gb-ram-after-18-days-of-uptime

Some see it as an unnecessary security risk due to its massive attack surface. It recently hit 1 million lines of code.
phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=systemd-2017-Git-Activity

Some don't like it because they dislike its habit of scope creep. The project ends up assimilating things that historically should not have anything to do with init. gif related.
suckless.org/sucks/systemd

There's also some other design decisions that people have an issue with, such as using Google DNS by default (because of course systemd can handle DNS), using binary logs, etc.

Lastly there's the conspiracy theory side of it, which alleges that systemd is an NSA attempt to compromise GNU/Linux, and due to Systemd as a project moving way too fast, it can't be properly audited.
web.archive.org/web/20170724100245/https://muchweb.me/systemd-nsa-attempt/

For more links and arguments, see:
without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd

Attached: Systemd_anigif.gif (200x133, 772K)

For more information on the DNS issue, see pic related

Attached: SystemdDNS.jpg (1432x1700, 785K)

And for the cherry on top, the infamous motherboard bricking

Attached: fucksystemd.png (1280x2084, 619K)

Is there any real reason to use runit over sysvinit? Also, Devuan in general is a distro that isn't made for tinkering. It's made for people who want Debian without all the problems of systemd, and they want it in a "just works" easy to install and use package. That being said, why change the default Devuan init system at all? It boots the system and works as intended.

Attached: pepe-the-frog.jpg (1024x768, 44K)

>Is there any real reason to use runit over sysvinit?
faster, comfy to use
wiki.voidlinux.eu/Runit

>init freedom
>not free to use systemd

You are free to install systemd. Add the Debian repos and install it, retard. Or just install Debian, since that's exactly what you're asking for. Go be stupid somewhere else.

kek

>not free to use systemd
If you want systemd, use Debian, or 90 percent of distros in general.
Devuan is providing people the freedom to use something different, because systemd is so restrictive and so much tends to depend on it in a system that they had to make a separate distro.

Windows doesn't have this problem.

>did its job well
It obviously didn't, considering there are still jews around...

That's right. GNU/Linux with Systemd is like a tree with a lot of rotten apples on it. Sucks, but can be salvaged. With Windows, the whole tree is fucked at the root

The DNS is a fallback that will be used when the user's ISP fucks up and their DNS server goes down. Not that it matters since most tinfoil hat wearers can easily change the fallback DNS or just unplug the network.

Must be why it's still the most used operating system for servers to this day...

Attached: 1527323205206.jpg (638x359, 55K)

Like Ash Ketchum, Onkel Adolf couldn't catch 'em all.

Attached: original.png (1312x889, 32K)

That has absolutely nothing to do with 40% of IT jobs being held by Pajeet, Samira, Chang, and Mingmei. Try looking at HPC server market share, Winkiddy.

t. Tom's Hardware

you mean "server operating system" as in "retard purchases amazonaws, uses 1-click install ubuntu 16.04, calls it a server"

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Operating_systems_used_on_top_500_supercomputers.svg

>blurry little jpeg for ants
>no source posted
Typical Microsoft street shitter.

t. purch media

Install Gentoo.

BASED
lol absolute state of loonex virgins
>500 computers is more than literal millions of business servers
KEK