What is the best Jow Forums approved word processor/editor/etc?

What is the best Jow Forums approved word processor/editor/etc?

Attached: typewriter.jpg (780x520, 56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Слово_и_Дело_(программа)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correction_paper
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Vim

visual studio code

pen & paper can't be hacked by NSA/Russia

gets the job done

Attached: notepad.png (200x200, 40K)

based
cringe

But it can be hacked by real-life people. And it isn't useful for anything you want to have printed letters (99% of documents)

Would VIM-LaTeX be better or simply Vim?

html if it's something you need to look nice
plain text if it's notes for yourself or doesn't require special formatting

MS Word 2007, 2010, or 2013.

From 2016 on, the plug-ins won't work anymore.

Go full autismo and get vim. Run through vimtutor and shits insanely productive

Windows:
notepad++

Linux:
nano, vi/vim, gedit

VIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIKMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIMVIM

eventually you will become godlike and will use vim, a vimlike tiling wm and qutebrowser (a keyboard driven vimlike web browser)

Ed is the standard text editor.

for macOS, textedit still the best. 10/10 font rendering, advanced typing correction to minimize mistakes, minimal + clean interface, powerful features

LaTeX

I personally use texmaker

This.

>tfw notepad++ is not cross-platform

Attached: 86543859431070.jpg (412x351, 20K)

Emacs.

Word and Deed

I prefer Word and Deed 2: warband

>open Atom
>10 seconds to load UI
>another 30 seconds to load text
>only have 70k files in project
definitely not Atom

Wordpad.

Attached: moorecompaqpres.jpg (403x292, 29K)

> I use emacs, which might be thought of as a thermonuclear word processor. It was created by RichardStallman; enough said. It is written in Lisp, which is the only computer language that is beautiful. It is colossal, and yet it only edits straight ASCII text files, which is to say, no fonts, no boldface, no underlining. In other words, the engineer-hours that, in the case of Microsoft Word, were devoted to features like mail merge, and the ability to embed feature-length motion pictures in corporate memoranda, were, in the case of emacs, focused with maniacal intensity on the deceptively simple-seeming problem of editing text. If you are a professional writer – i.e., if someone else is getting paid to worry about how your words are formatted and printed – emacs outshines all other editing software in approximately the same way that the noonday sun does the stars. It is not just bigger and brighter; it simply makes everything else vanish. – Neal Stephenson, In the Beginning was the Command Line

ok he might as well just marry it then lol

what about neovim?

LyX

I found a Brother SX-4000 in the garbage a few months ago, it works perfectly and now I use it to write checks and letters.

Attached: 81oDSzhYC8L._SL1500_.jpg (1500x791, 131K)

emacs + evil mode + org mode

Micro and atom

I dare you, that's a real program: ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Слово_и_Дело_(программа)

vim + [markup language], such as:
(classic, definitely Jow Forums approved)
- LaTeX
- *roff
(lightweight markup, probably Jow Forums approved)
- Markdown
- AsciiDoc
- ReStructuredText
(XML, probably not Jow Forums approved but still better than "word processors")
- DocBook
- DITA
- S1000D

Emacs is the best editor
but people here don't use it because it requires you to know how to program to unlock it's true potential

Attached: pepe-school-prints.jpg (264x264, 26K)

So you turn into Luke smith

Nopedadqq seems like a good alternative

I use notepad++ for everything

Vim if you're fucking around in a shell or VSCode + Vim extensions if you need some GUI love (and the git integration is bretty gud)

cat, sed, awk, head, tail, dd

How do you fix typos on analog typewriter?

Best for what purpose?

This. I got Luked after watching vim videos and I have started using tiling wm & terminal programs

Vim and Sublime Text were the most frequent answers in october 2017
i guess today VS Code would have more votes

Attached: text editors.png (589x663, 24K)

VS code is fine but I can't help thinking that everything you type there gets uploaded to Microsoft

Word.
It's the best.

I like 2003, 2010, 2016.

any pre-web hardware word processor

Attached: wp80.png (630x480, 494K)

the source is on github, you can compile it yourself if you're paranoid
i have more trouble ideologically with electron
why wouldn't they make a proper frontend instead of browser?

WordGrinder

Cross platforming is hard

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correction_paper

is this some new fag speak?