Can someone redpill on this linux drama?

Jow Forums has a CoC

If that was true, Jow Forums wouldn't exist.

this
lost my job thanks to pro-homo message on reddit and the 4chin monsters outed the real me and now i'm homeless
fucking nazis fuck you
pray for the gay (to not go away)

>Jow Forums
you mother fucking faggot.
niggers, faggots and the rest of the subhumans are bringing politics into software development and you still think that it's Jow Forumstards throwing tantrums?

Abusing CoC is not ideal. But CoC is necessary to lay out rules to follow in a professional environment. You'd expect people to stay civil anyway but if someone starts crossing the line you can basically ban him/her by showing the CoC.

However taking the CoC to the extreme is not desirable and everyone knows that. This istrue scotsman fallacy. CoC is not inherently a bad thing. I'm concerned that the actual SJWs are celebrating over this for some reason.

Not that they would matter anyway in the long run.

Jow Forums.org/rules

>niggers, faggots and the rest of the subhumans are bringing politics into software development and you still think that it's Jow Forumstards throwing tantrums?
I don't like identity politics, but there are actual niggers and faggots that have contributed far more than you ever did in the world of CS, or in your favorite game, OS, browser, website, phone, router, TV etc. Simply ruling them out because of their skin color and sexual interest is counter-productive.

this
remember if you see someone going peepee poopoo on the street
he/she/th/xir/k'hnarp is really just contributing

it's non-controversial, and that's probably exactly the point. I haven't argued that.

just tell me what something like this means to you:
theregister.co.uk/2016/11/16/microsoft_joins_linux_foundation_as_platinum_member/

The last bastion of freedom from SJWs has been breached and its leader captured.

CoCs- the need for ? - C'mon, lets be honest here now.
The only reason this is a drama and issue now, is because 1 (one) deranged trannie in need of more gullibles for her Patreon 'Pay4MyVagina' Fund decided, her only possible use in life was to knock up 'inclusive' trash such as CoCs (because saf, no-one sane wanted to), then kick up as much shit as she could to get it adpoted. And make it feel wanted and useful., temporarily, till the next inevitable strop about whos not heeding its CoC manifesto enough for its liking. And a few more donations to the patreon always helps as well, no?
Its self-serving nonsense, there was and is no need for a CoC till these ... created one. But they wont stop there, and everyone knows that.

Having a code of conduct is just a way for mentally ill faggots with thin skin to extralegally fuck people over. If something isn't illegal, it should be allowed. Period.

>muh site rules
For the most part, only the global rule is enforced, along with no porn on blue boards. I can talk about anything I please here. Porn doesn't belong on worksafe boards, since we already have boards for that content. Jow Forums's rules are really meant to keep them out of legal trouble and to keep content on it's appropriate board.

>This istrue scotsman fallacy.
t. brainlet youtube skeptic

>there are actual niggers and faggots that have contributed far more than you ever did in the world of CS
Not him but no, not really. I'm a software engineer and my office is entirely white and Asian men.

>Simply ruling them out because of their skin color and sexual interest is counter-productive
I'll allow anyone to contribute code to my projects but I'm not accepting a gay ass CoC. That's not code, it's frivolous faggot shit. These faggots are mad that the world of software development is meritocracy based, and they're only concerned with an equality of outcome. But like I said, they'll never get it. They'll never reach their utopia. Life is unfair and reality is rife with inequality.

Go be a commie brainlet somewhere else.

Attached: 1534770823598.jpg (960x686, 148K)

Communism doesn't mean dictatorship you retards

>theregister.co.uk/2016/11/16/microsoft_joins_linux_foundation_as_platinum_member/
Microsoft wants their .NET core framework to work in Linux and wants to have a major opinion on the decision and choices. The Linux Foundation is corrupted since a long time ago, they also endorsed MS's acquisition of github.

At the end of the day, money talks.
Does it mean I hate MS? Yes, more than I used to. But I can't stop the Linux Foundation.

> muh Hitler
> quoting Sam Hyde

Attached: xqxe8sxejmk11.jpg (3024x4032, 479K)

Linux got a CoC stormfaggets are panicking.

Yes it does. Every single time communism is tried, it turns into a dictatorship.
>w-w-wasn't real gommunism
Shut the fuck up, pinko.

Attached: 1534770304983.png (898x720, 353K)

Was your previous job a Catholic priest?

The only reason this is an issue is because butthurt Jow Forumstards like you make it one. When you guys start calling people niggers and send antisemetic death threats to projects because they announced they're considering an inclusivity change, you make the choice for them.

>When you guys start calling people niggers and send antisemetic death threats to projects
Things that don't happen.

>I'll take things that would never happen in Current Year +1 for $500, please Alex.
Also this

Communism is an ideology, a communist state is a form of government you fucking retard
An idea can be communist (like sharing free software, or communal living) without incorporating a dictatorship
> m-muh fox news strawman
Shut the fuck up, altcuck

how fucking dare you you fucking nazi scum
if i say i was sexually assaulted by the potus in his actual form of the shadow dragon then i was
save your doubts for the fellow nazis and their upcoming joo sisään terve terve täs olis tää mun fläppitaulu mihin niin nyt piirrän swot analyysin ja ryhmät c ja d koska niil on ihan sairaat raitsikat ei vittu voi ees tajuta miten himmeet tykit

As Eminem says, that's about as big as that tranny's gonna get. So she(he) should enjoy it. (for the time being)
If she deems herself useful she'll be open to public ridicule.
>For the most part, only the global rule is enforced, along with no porn on blue boards. I can talk about anything I please here. Porn doesn't belong on worksafe boards, since we already have boards for that content. Jow Forums's rules are really meant to keep them out of legal trouble and to keep content on it's appropriate board.
Um, sorry sweaty. I got banned for racism and off topic more than 10 times. How is that not SJW?
> I can talk about anything I please here.
Until you get banned or have your thread taken to Jow Forums. Don't try to fool me.
> I'm a software engineer and my office is entirely white and Asian men.
White and Asian men can't be faggots? How exactly do you know what kind of porn they watch?
>I'll allow anyone to contribute code to my projects but I'm not accepting a gay ass CoC.
Then don't? Why are _you_ moaning when Linux got one?

Even though in my major projects where I have a CoC set up, I am free to put meritocracy at the top because it's _my_ CoC. Simple.

Crawl back to your daycare pseudo intellectual echo chamber wherever the fuck it is, retard.

>If something isn't illegal, it should be allowed. Period.
It's illegal to use someone else's private property in a way they don't condone unless that manner of use is protected by federal law.
Like it or not, web content is private property.

This is absolute fucking horse shit. You have a legal system, no CoC in the world can trump laws and that's what these fags essentially are doing. They are setting conditions that apply before any legal system (what is neurodiversity - fun fact there is no such thing). They define their own narrative to police you around based on ideological beliefs of how a community should be run and not the content it produces. This conduct is putting political affiliation before anything while at the same time denying political affiliation. It's flawed, it's contradictory, it's wrong and will lead to linux dying and technology to stagnate as nobody will be willing to have a heated debate about technology without risking to lose face.

Thanks america for intoxicating everything on this planet with your worthless shit. I hope you get nuked

And before you say some stupid shit like "muh free speech" re. "unless that manner of use is protected by federal law":
First of all, the federal law in question may not even come from a government that protects free speech.
Secondly, the US government, for example, protects free speech from the government itself. It does not necessarily protect all free speech from private property owners as well.

Don't worry, Linux is too big to die.

I think poofta finbro is off his meds.

In other words, to conclude: I have the right to throw you off my private property -- including software -- for any reason, including just because I don't support your expressed beliefs. It's not illegal for me to do this. So, by your own reasoning, it should be allowed.

Horrible bait, piss poor arguments, underscores in the middle of sentences for no reason. Go back to r*ddit.

So if I shoot someone on my private property for no reason, I can't be arrested and tried for murder, because the laws only prevent the government from committing murders? Nice argument there, faggot. You don't get to apply the laws as you see fit. They're universally enforced.

Attached: 1527161698849.png (614x614, 31K)

But it's not to big to change. For the worse.

see you absolute schizo.

/thread
You know what to do with the next thread.

Attached: 1.png (552x110, 5K)

>no argument left
>posts frog
haha textbook.

>So if I shoot someone on my private property for no reason, I can't be arrested and tried for murder, because the laws only prevent the government from committing murders?
No, because murder is different. Freedom of speech is a liberty, and laws against murder are limitations of liberties. These are both valid kinds of laws, and I REFUSE to acknowledge any argument from you that the law must consist EITHER entirely of one OR entirely of the other. A legal system that had to abide by such restrictions would be incredibly dysfunctional and pose no benefit to show for it.
In other words:
Yes, you can still be tried for murder, because you did not have the right to shoot that person.
And, no, you still do not have the right to speak your mind freely on my private property, because you do not have the right to BE on my private property.
And, NO, that is not hypocritical or a contradiction in any way.

>You know what to do with the next thread.
accuse it of raping my scalp because anssi denied access to rummut after me trying to hidastettuna kaikki worse

...

>No, because murder is different.
This is all I needed to read. Nice goal post shift, thanks for the self defeating arguments.

Attached: 1534771028994.jpg (566x480, 54K)

Bringing up murder in the first place was the goalpost shift here and we both know it. Because, it is, in fact, different. Objectively. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of law.

tripfag arguing for CoC

CoC = centralized power = non-free

Bringing up free speech in the first place was the goalpost shift here and we both know it. Because, it is, in fact, different. Objectively. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of law.

Attached: 1534809946965.jpg (450x450, 45K)

> This conduct is putting political affiliation before anything while at the same time denying political affiliation.
There is nothing political about a code of conduct. There's liberals who oppose it as well as conservatives who don't care. The code of conduct is just common sense, I bet 99% of you haven't even read it.

>Bringing up free speech in the first place was the goalpost shift here
Different goalpost shift, but I agree.
That being said, I think you don't realize what exactly you just said that I agree with.
You basically just conceded that this thread never belonged on Jow Forums.

Leave, by the way.

>There is nothing political about a code of conduct

Attached: b2cf0f75b53c8ac085695a9a7bf4513ab5e9bb1de4de230a7e425fa4d1788a84.jpg (1616x1639, 667K)

K fag

Attached: 1535002725271.jpg (750x612, 65K)

linux is communist now. esr's predictions confirmed. apologize to esr

Every major party has one you dumb frog poster.

You're such a retard. Retards like you make dumb arguments that I can turn around on you instantly. You're inconsistent and hypocritical, and you oppose the things I say not because I'm wrong but because I'm right and it hurts your feelings. You're like a child.

I think you've wasted more than enough of my time. Have a nice day.

let's reddit

Someone is blackmailing Linus.

>This week people in our community confronted me about my lifetime of not understanding emotions. My flippant attacks in emails have been
both unprofessional and uncalled for. Especially at times when I made it personal. In my quest for a better patch, this made sense to me. I know now this was not OK and I am truly sorry.

>The above is basically a long-winded way to get to the somewhat painful personal admission that hey, I need to change some of my behavior, and I want to apologize to the people that my personal
behavior hurt and possibly drove away from kernel development entirely.

>Retards like you make dumb arguments that I can turn around on you instantly.
And yet you've yet to do so. (My first post in the thread was btw)
>I'm right
How are you right in claiming, that hypothetically, you should be allowed to come to my software project -- which, by the way, is my private property -- and say whatever you want on it, and I shouldn't be allowed to decide at my own discretion whether or how long you're allowed to stay there -- whatever you say notwithstanding, much less because of it?
Replace "software project" with "house" and you'll see why this is irrational. It's absolutely absurd to claim I have no say in how long a guest may stay at my house. Frankly, that borders on violating the third amendment.

Linux had one too, it just wasn't written by blue-haired SJWs like the new one.
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8a104f8b5867c682d994ffa7a74093c54469c11f

What in the fuck?

Basically pic related is going on.

Attached: 1507572987903.jpg (2352x1218, 1.34M)

Finnish swear words.

>people were bullying Torvalds for being the productive autist that he is
would git even exist if torvalds wasn't autistic

>1. Embrace
>2. Extend
>3. Extinguish
Linux just reached level 3
>twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/1041441155874009093
Open acknowledgement that the destruction of Linux community is the goal

CoC are used for witch hunts, look at what happenend at Django and NodeJS.

Not gonna lie, his apology letter very much sounded like he created git as a technical solution to a social problem. And it worked.

through his femi nazi daughter I bet

And they contributed even though there was no CoC.

fuck this hits close to home
>mtg
>gaming
>crypto
>now fucking linux

If you think free == communism then i'm excited for you to graduate highschool and eventually stop being a moron

Fuck you dipshit, I used to live in a communist country and I was forced to work for the dictatorship and give up my money fuck head

My country was a communist dictatorship. It's a natural state of affairs for any communist country to also be a dictatorship. It's practically built into the ideology.

Which is completely irrelevant to the issue. The problem is not whether people can include CoC in their projects, it's whether they should.

Don't forget Python

Throw Coraline Ada Ehmke into a fucking well and follow that freak with a ton of bricks. We don't need creeps like him.

Attached: 1460299991746.gif (256x192, 998K)

Which country? I live in Poland and we're still recovering economically from the commies.

Linus has finally vomited all over himself for the last time due to all the trannies and weirdos who infect open source. Rather than let the stress of dealing with those degenerates put him in an early grave, he's turning control of Linux over to the cancerous horde.

The ideology behind it on paper doesn't, but that's just not how it goes in the real world.

SJW's doing their usual shit trying to ruin everything for everybody