>Be babby's first web developer >Know just enough php and sql to get by >See all the tech companies doing all this awful shit censoring people >Think: I should make a website that lets people write without censorship >Actually gets it done >Ask Jow Forums for help >They actually fucking help
Most recently had to put in an admin portal that makes it easy to block an article if there is clearly spam. Makes it a very quick process and only trusted members would be able to have this ability. They would have to prove their overall libertarianism and dislike for blocking people's thoughts. I may make a page where it shows all the articles that have been blocked so we still do not silence but you can see what has been blocked and clearly tell why.
It would be a small group of highly libertarian people that detest silencing opinion. The only instances of blocking can occur when someone is clearly posting spam or just pure shit. I can show you what these articles look like. They serve nothing to actually preserving free speech.
Take for example I had a guy from Zimbabwe post 5 articles selling tours which had dollar amounts and dates and when they pick you up at the airport. So generally this is not something a community of freedom-thinkers want to see... so I blocked those.
Jordan Gonzalez
>They would have to prove their overall libertarianism and dislike for blocking people's thoughts. Dude, free-speech, but only if I like it.
Evan Foster
I will post this important lesson that made me derive to this conclusion:
>In the 1970s Chile was going through the people wanting a more socialist government >They manage to democratically elect a socialist under the name of Salvador Ayende >The people wanted destruction of their own country, even though there had recently been many countries and many deaths that went down this path, they still wanted it by majority rule. >The USA saw this. They saw what was happening and wanted to put a stop to it. >CIA operatives decide to give resources and additional power to war general Augusto Pinochet to create a successful coup d'etat. >Augusto Pinochet with his war resources and help from the CIA commits a successful coup d'etat against the socialist regime. >Pinochet holds power. Non democratically elected dictator. >He then forcefully gets rid of all the communist sympathizers. >Nazis also come to Chile en masse trying to escape being put in prison. >He kills them too.
Currently Chile is the wealthiest nation having taken on capitalist structures against all the other nations. We're dealing with a big issue with more socialist ideals coming in but this is more recent. The point stands. When this happened it is a clear example that majority rules is SHIT. So I will elect for trusted libertarians to judge those who post. If they disagree with it, they wouldn't take it down because of their libertarian beliefs. A minority rules reality. Fuck the Lord of The Flies shit.
Ian Torres
>censorship free site >who wants to help me censor stuff?
Nathaniel Torres
Protip: If you want to avoid criticism for removing material you don't think people "want to see", toss all non-illegal blocked content into an archive for open review.
You know its illegal to post any news that portrays any Jewish person negatively true or not.
Also is this app following the guidelines? Is it created by a diverse panel that represents equality? If not then how can it be trusted?
Dylan Walker
>He kills them too. Your infantile knowledge of the history of Chile is funny, it's like you know nothing about colonia dignidad and the pedophile Nazis. There is a reason why the Pope had to remove most of our bishops. >Currently Chile is the wealthiest nation Dude, we have people on the radio talking about how we are never going to become a developed nation because all the wealth goes to USA and Europe. Our industrialization process was stopped by the CIA because they wanted us to be a miner colony. It is like you can't even think by yourself.
Josiah Sanders
Yes I may do this. It wouldbe a simple sql statement too.
I am being censored by 1stamender. Apparently dicks in mouth are not covered in the first amendment. 1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=1374 Check the comments. OP is indeed a faggot.
It was an opinion piece, no bully just free speech. Op can post pictures of others and call them basedboys but I can't use pictures and call them faggots?
Blake Morris
Basedboys**
Daniel Kelly
Can we ban this faggot for spamming this thread every day already?
