So will the AMD bottlenecking meme finally stop now?
Also I'd rather have a few less frames in 1080p than deal with Intel which has shown blatant contempt for consumers - their EULA for a vital specture security patch which would have banned users from benchmarking their own systems is only one of many examples.
Got myself a 1600X beginning of this year. Gladly paid 250 euros instead of the 300+ for the intel equivalent that indeed provides a few more frames. Also AMD motherboard was cheaper.
Michael Turner
show us doom, and ashes of the singularity benches too op.
Samuel Collins
>stock clocks >pure hair: off What did they mean with this?
Gabriel Myers
Both are bottlenecking the 2080ti. Wait for the 9900k or 9700k to BTFO the streetshitters.
Jacob Reed
>1600x >not going with the chad 2600
John Lee
2600x wasn't out yet also >marginal improvements
better to wait for proper zen2
Gavin Brown
Pure Hair: >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TressFX#PureHair AMD's version of HairWorks, pretty computationally expensive. Probably leave it off to avoid the impact on frames.
>stock clocks You know what this means. It doesn't quite tell the whole story, of course - the 8700k has a ton of OC headroom, which does dampen OP's point.
Just gtfo with this shit. Nobody is or should be paying a couple grand for just two fucking components.
> the 8700k has a ton of OC headroom But, but, but muh 1%!!! Hardware reviews should include both OC and non OC because majority of people don't OC their shit.
Christian Cooper
>AMD's version of HairWorks say no more >You know what this means. It doesn't quite tell the whole story, of course - the 8700k has a ton of OC headroom, which does dampen OP's point. Everytime I see benches like these they also use some super fast ram on the AMD system, and oops up setting on the intel ones.
Hunter Gomez
>AMD's version of HairWorks >say no more let's see >License MIT License[1] >github.com/GPUOpen-Effects/TressFX ohh my, it's literally botnet... who knows what kind of Furry optimizations they snuck into that proprietary blob...
faggots.
Noah Green
Hey Julia, are you one of those disgusting eastern european crackheads ?
Eli Perez
>stock clocks yeah how is the 8700K even running at all without a heatsink?
Aiden Roberts
What? We don't do drygs here. That's a thing for lefttards.
Ayden Lopez
How often do you post this image?
Lincoln Ross
Why are you asking?
Luke Cooper
>AMD's version of hairworks >Completly DIY solutuin that'sharder to implement I guess most devs will just use hairworks, and whatever is part of nvidia's gameworks. >ree why are devs only using goyworks
Jonathan Turner
cuz you never post feet, but that's the second, or third time that I've seen that image.
Chase White
Most devs use hairworks because novidia offers either money or man hours from their employees to help the studio with the game. Novidiots would even defend a closed source library over an opensource one.
Parker Bennett
>stock clocks when it supports my point >max OC with liquid nitrogen when it doesn't
>offers either money >nvidia offers them money >intel offers them money >software devs don't want to sell software to consumers, just intel, and nvidia The state of amdfags >or man hours from their employees to help the studio with the game. NVIDIA has better customer service, so they are bad. No one complained when AMD did the same thing with Ashes of the singularity, or the fact that AMD should have the advantage since they are console cpus/gpus.
Kayden Davis
This just shows AMD is superior since a woman choose Intel. Toothpaste cpus
i don't give a shit if jayztwoshekels is shilling for either brand, he's a dumb faggot
Henry Long
how does it feel having paid for a 1920x but 3x the price?
Jayden Nelson
probably feels good when using it with content creating software.
Anthony Green
>6-core vs 8-core >almost a tie >AMD WINS!!! AYYMD Logic Just wait for 9900k
Aaron Brown
Considering that a Meme Lake CPU like 8700 or even 7700 mops the floor with AyyMD trash, pretty good.
Asher Lewis
Intel has the core speed advantage. To cry about ryzen having too many cores, is the same as crying about intel having too fast cores and that all test should be done at equal clocks. The reality is that what ever edge one CPU has over the other should be presented to people so they can know the real world performance. Objective core for core and clock for clock tests are good and have their place, just not something end users care most about.
Jacob Butler
i3 vs thread killer?
Adrian Wood
The one valid critique is where do they have room to improve. Intel can't get better yields or get down to a smaller node so more cores and higher frequency are hard to attain right now. AMD has great yields due to the chiplet design and they have 7 nm products working.
There's also the recent security flaws in Intel chips and the artificial segmentation of LGA1151 with 300 series chipsets and Coffee Lake that are easily compatible with 2015 hardware.
Wyatt Clark
>So will the AMD bottlenecking meme finally stop now?
Reminder this tranny namefaggot was most likely neglected by his parents and is seeking attention on an anonymous imageboard.
Noah Harris
It's getting harder, and harder to find a purpose for that amd hardware huh.
Hunter Rivera
Good.
Jaxson Wilson
The 1080ti only has 1.5% GPU marketshare on steam HW survey after how many years it's been out? I'm willing to bet the 2080ti will be registered in the sub-1% category.
Jaxson Robinson
Remember when AMDrones were saying Ryzen is meant for 1440p gaming and that 1080p is obsolete to cover up their shit performance.
Well as expected now that more powerful GPUs are there it's a bottleneck even on 1440p
this is why you should always benchmark CPUs with low res
More like Hairworks is a really shitty knock off of tressfx
William Thomas
>BUT I NEED 4 FPS
Jordan Turner
Any other videos about this? I'm not giving my (view) to JayzTwoBraincells.
Eli Cooper
>AMD losing FPS in 1080p compared to Intel >have more FPS than Intel in other resolutions this sounds like it's fixed by game developers optimizing the game a little, the performance is available from hardware side
Adam Ward
Pretty much game by game you will get mixed results. Things to look for are the fact that 1. 2700x is cheaper than the 8700k and 2. pretty sure it does better in real world applications like for actual work.
John Russell
>b-but muh intlel for gaymen IT'S OVER INTLEL IS FINISHED
Liam Scott
>jayz literally says the game engine is shit SEETHING intlel shill
Angel Butler
>pretty sure it does better in real world applications like for actual work Like with what?
Logan Nguyen
Wow, you saved 50 whole Euros and the only downside is that you got noticeably shittier performance.
Mason Gonzalez
2600 is a kino CPU. i am looking to buy an AMD GPU soon also. freesync and like like offer way better value propositions over their competitors.
Andrew Sullivan
Go back to installing security patches
Ian Hernandez
Irrelevant Only thing that matters is price.
>AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $329.99
>Intel Core i7-8700K $399.99
Basically the same in games with Ryzen offering substantial performance gains over it's Intel counterpart in productivity AMD multitasking. Allso the AM4 platform will be supported next gen while the Intel boards will be a dead end.
>offering substantial performance gains over it's Intel counterpart in productivity AMD multitasking >productivity >multitasking Like what? Can I do Photoshop, Premiere, Davinci Resolve 15, and Cakewalk better with AMD?
Jason Morris
>Can I do Photoshop, Premiere, Davinci Resolve 15, and Cakewalk better with AMD? crickets
general rendering encoding & compression or doing multiple things at the same time. Adobe software is heavily single threaded so they run about the same on both.
Ryan Roberts
Is better on AMD, or Intel?
Juan Johnson
Adobe is on bed with Intel. Don't expect AMD to perform better on their software.
Fun fact, Adobe software used to have better multithreaded performance before Rysen release. But *something* happened to their render engines.
Colton Nguyen
Adobe software runs about the same on whatever you put it one from dual core i3s to 28 core Xeons. At least until you start trying to multitask. Then the AMD system would pull ahead due to core count.
>Adobe software runs about the same on whatever you put it one from dual core i3s to 28 core Xeons I guess I'll try out the i3 then. What's a good gpu?
Asher Wilson
Depends on your budget. You can get used gtx 970s extremely cheap on Amazon right now.
Michael Lee
Aren't the Tomb Raider games optimized especially for AMD CPUs though?
Brody Green
>gtx 970 vs, gtx 1060 6gb, vs rx580 8gb? RX580 should be better for adobe, no?
Jace Nelson
>Aren't the Tomb Raider games optimized especially for AMD CPUs though? No. They are just properly multithreaded like all games should be. Games like Far Cry 5 are not optimized for anyone. They are just shit and Intel CPUs currently deal with legacy code and bad programing practices better.
The benchmark has it pretty even in most stuff, outside of adaptive wide angle (amd doing poorly for whatever reason). And the gtx 1060 is esier to find, so I kind of have to go with it + a decklink.
Jeremiah Powell
>pretends he didn't see "stock clocks"
Zachary Gutierrez
Toothpaste cpus
Adrian Young
The vast majority of people do no OC.
Evan Young
>le gaymen Grow up kiddies. Ryzen is best option and cheaper.
John Gray
Ryzen is best. Just stay away from all the software that proves otherwise. Maybe you like to run a database, or crack passwords, but with software that doesn't use cuda?
>far cry engine >ever not unoptimized garbage intel only wins the "garbage game engines" race lmao
Grayson Peterson
Not hard to find the 8GB for $200 after MIR.
Leo Hill
Unfortunately the garbage game engine games are usually the most fun. And the "properly coded masterpieces" are shit games that never needed to be made for PC.