The code looks ugly

>the code looks ugly

Attached: 3fb.jpg (592x412, 19K)

Brainlets that have only know Javascript and are scared of C and C++ say this

There is incredibly ugly code.

>the code is objectively ugly

Attached: 1537885511201.jpg (700x700, 116K)

The code written in certain programming languages like basic and Lua is ugly.
In general, shit with no brackets.

>the code looks too simple

Attached: ITSAMESHHHMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.jpg (640x448, 199K)

shit taste
C syntax is awful

C is fine.

What do you prefer, a makefile? A configure script?

implicit over explicit
keywords over symbols

Ugly code is fine, but well organized and concise code is truly a thing of beauty.

There is a clear distinction between good code and bad code. If you believe that good, pretty, clean code is based on the language and NOT the formatting of logic, then it's very clear that you lack experience in the field.

lines of code are from the internet

>>you cheated and the dean will be notified

I refuse to believe anyone would say this

Enough Haskell will do that to you.

Anyone that spends their time masturbating to hentai instead of writing clear concise well documented code sohuld just be fired.

literally what university does this? my uni lets you take basically anything as long as you credit it and can explain it if asked

/thread
python is the ugliest shit around

>accidentally press tab once
>welp time to start over

How about these nuts in your mouth?
I bet you're some frontend JavaShit webcuck.

>C syntax is awful
you don't know how to program in C

I do, I just don't have stockholm syndrome about it

rust code is the most beautiful
fuck pajeets like who unironically prefer implicit dogshit

explicit is for dumb people posing as intelligent people

Yeah, that's not what ugly code is, nobody ITT knows what ugly code is. C and C++ syntax is very clean. Ugly code comes from being unable to decipher what the fuck variables and functions do, poor comments, constant """"smart"""""" implementations that fuck over simplicity, a gazillion nested typedefs, etc.

>C++ syntax is very clean
what?

im cool as long as its doc'd/ commented

C/C++ allow you to make the nicest looking code or the nastiest looking piece of shit.
It is just this flexible.

std::doubt

using namespace std

lua isn't that ugly, unless you really hate the word "end"
or maybe seeing "setmetatable" everywhere, depending on how you're using the language (all my shit was pretty data driven rather than object oriented, so I didn't really fuck around with that too much)
should know, spent the last two weeks only writing lua

if you want ugly code, look at literally any non-trivial bash script
good fuck is it ugly

there's nothing quite as dumb as opening a python file in some editor other than your usual, making a quick change or just cleaning shit up, and then because your editor was set to use tabs for indent instead of spaces, or was set to a different number of spaces, shit breaks
bonus points if what you were doing would have been purely aesthetic in another language and would have had no possible chance to break shit

end blocks are unironically more readable than {}

Honestly if you struggle to understand C++ syntax, you're a bad programmer.

>if you don't like it you're just bad at at it
the ultimate retort of 115 IQ brainlets pretending to be smart

but python *is* a fucking curly braces lang

Attached: 6dcf04a.jpg (769x881, 77K)

That's because C and C++ style syntax is perfectly logical. In most cases there isn't a better alternative without sacrificing features and/or consistency.