gentle reminder that you can change wikipedia's skin
Gentle reminder that you can change wikipedia's skin
Jack Hughes
Other urls found in this thread:
developer.mozilla.org
twitter.com
Easton Johnson
>calling CSS a skin
fuck off of Jow Forums already
Luis Harris
This post is extremely low quality.
Easton Fisher
CSS is a name of a language. Using the the word skin in the context OP used it in is a lot more appropriate.
Isaac Phillips
>Cascading Style Sheet
>language
the absolute state of Jow Forums
Jonathan Edwards
Adrian Sanders
i suppose you agree with all the google results that call HTML 'code' too
Hudson Bell
That's bullshit and you know it.
Joshua Sanchez
HTML literally has language in its name. You go ahead and post those google results and I will tell you if I agree with them or not. W3 says it's a language, and W3 is the body that is responsible for defining CSS.
Zachary Cox
The "M" stands for "Markup", HTML is a markup language; just like, say, Markdown.
Therefore, it is a language but not "code" which is usually defined as "text in a programming langauge".
Robert Perry
I welcome you to open a dictionary and look up what the word code can mean.
Jordan Wilson
Sorry, I should have been more precise -- let me amend what I said: "which, in this context, is usually (...)".
Ethan Rogers
Actually, don't. I don't want to argue about whether code is the right word to call HTML text or not. Just show me those google results and I'll tell you if I agree or not.
Colton Carter
>"which, in this context, is usually (...)".
In that case you have no right to say it's incorrect to use the word this way - you can say that it's uncommon.
Ayden Scott
So Jow Forums actually knows their shit?
Or a basement dweller like you thinks their useless opinion matters more than the ones behind it?
developer.mozilla.org
Robert Richardson
You're adding arbitrary meaning to terms that never had them. "Code" or "language" in the context of computing has never implied 'turning complete'.
John Brown
you mean touring
anal must be turning in his grave
Lucas Fisher
>touring
it's turing, faggot
not turning, not touring
Zachary James
> you ---->
> joke
Jason Lewis
I don't use Google, and I'm not the one you originally replied to. Trusting random Google results is stupid, I think we can both agree on that.
Alright, I concede my point. In a professional environment you would probably be better off with a term to mean what is common for it.
I'm not a native speaker, so maybe this is a language issue, but in the environments I've worked in, "code" usually _did_ imply "text in a language that is turing complete (or at least closer to it than a fucking markup langauge)". "Language" is an entirely different beast, and no matter the context I don't think it will ever have that meaning.
Joshua Adams
>I don't use Google, and I'm not the one you originally replied to. Trusting random Google results is stupid, I think we can both agree on that.
I'm not asking you to trust results of google, I'm asking you to trust sites referenced by that google query, particularly w3.org. You are really dumb if you thought the screenshot was relevant in any other way.
>In a professional environment you would probably be better off with a term to mean what is common for it.
Great advice from a mentally challenged.
Mason Howard
People still use wikipedia? I have that propoganda blocked in my hosts file.