THANK YOU BASED INTEL

that's gotta be the most pretentious fucking s0iboi bullshit r/pcmasterrace fucking packaging i've ever seen. Just put it in a normal fucking box please. There's no need to have 50 dollars worth of fucking packaging.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: 1527535460431.jpg (800x764, 115K)

Still the best in gaymen. Try next year AMD cucks.

>being poor

Attached: 1537910830936.jpg (672x691, 45K)

Oh man, I forgot about that shit! You got a link so I can save for future keks?

not him, but:

9to5mac.com/2012/01/10/ces-2012-intel-fakes-live-ultrabook-demo-mulls-massive-advertising-campaign-to-push-macbook-air-killers/

youtube.com/watch?v=TAGrPyMKA_k

fuckin Z80 lookin ass

>can't even solder CPU for $1-2
>implying Intel would do $50 packaging

Attached: 1533755857006.png (1440x509, 388K)

Thanks man! This is a rare and beautiful form of comedy.

Attached: 6a5.jpg (1033x679, 49K)

>it's an "Intel knowingly launches insecure processors with hardware security vulnerabilities and the tech press and tech tubers say nothing about it" type of episode

imagine if a car manufacturer knowingly released cars with faulty breaks

8c/16t 5ghz+ though

Neutral on the 9900k packaging but I am an industrial designer and recently purchased a Threadripper 2950x and the extra design they add to the packaging does add to the "premium" feeling for expensive hardware. Even if it's just psychologically, it's disappointing to purchase a 2000 dollar high end Intel CPU and it comes in the same packaging as a 50 dollar celeron.

Expensive packaging is a meme

You take a look at it later and realize the item is now outdated and worth 20% of its original value and you throw that shit out

That might be your opinion, but packaging design is an enormous field these days.

I don't doubt it

>it's disappointing to purchase a 2000 dollar high end Intel CPU and it comes in the same packaging as a 50 dollar celeron.
I just don't give a fuck about the packaging.
To me what's dissapointing is the fact that it only has
>16 threads
>16 pcie lanes
>no ecc
>needs new socket
>$500+
It's just a big fuck you to anyone interested in buying their cpus.
Thanks intel you just released an 1800x without ecc compatability for $500+, and gimped the rest of your shit to do it.
FUCK YOU!

Yeah, honestly.
Learning I'd need to upgrade my mobo anyways, I just bought a 1950x
Now I'm parallelizing my waifu.

>Now I'm parallelizing my waifu.
What do you mean?

I don't buy electronics to wank over a fucking box.

>Lain
>wants
>more
>cores

Attached: 1517547979264.png (1238x1080, 486K)

I thought 9th generation didn't need a new socket. Is this specific to the i9 9900k?

Attached: dodecahedron.png (400x359, 199K)

Meant possibly a new chipset/mobo.
But intel would still be fucking dicks even if they were 100% compatible with current boards.
>16pcie lanes
>no ecc
>16 threads
for that price is just intel asking for a fight.
cool

Attached: SELain.jpg (4952x4320, 2.09M)

>for that price is just intel asking for a fight.
I agree. You can get actual working ECC on a X370 board today. The fact that Intel is so jewish about ECC pisses me off.

t. 1700X ECC user

What board?

GA-AX370 Gaming 5.

$ sudo dmesg | grep -i edac
[ 0.116064] EDAC MC: Ver: 3.0.0
[ 12.776594] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC enabled.
[ 12.776595] EDAC amd64: F17h detected (node 0).
[ 12.776632] EDAC MC: UMC0 chip selects:
[ 12.776633] EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 0MB 1: 0MB
[ 12.776634] EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 8192MB 3: 0MB
[ 12.776634] EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB
[ 12.776635] EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB
[ 12.776637] EDAC MC: UMC1 chip selects:
[ 12.776637] EDAC amd64: MC: 0: 0MB 1: 0MB
[ 12.776638] EDAC amd64: MC: 2: 8192MB 3: 0MB
[ 12.776638] EDAC amd64: MC: 4: 0MB 5: 0MB
[ 12.776639] EDAC amd64: MC: 6: 0MB 7: 0MB
[ 12.776639] EDAC amd64: using x8 syndromes.
[ 12.776640] EDAC amd64: MCT channel count: 2
[ 12.776774] EDAC MC0: Giving out device to module amd64_edac controller F17h: DEV 0000:00:18.3 (INTERRUPT)
[ 12.776787] EDAC PCI0: Giving out device to module amd64_edac controller EDAC PCI controller: DEV 0000:00:18.0 (POLLED)
[ 12.776787] AMD64 EDAC driver v3.5.0

$ sudo edac-util --report=full
mc0:csrow2:mc#0csrow#2channel#0:CE:0
mc0:csrow2:mc#0csrow#2channel#1:CE:0
mc0:noinfo:all:UE:0
mc0:noinfo:all:CE:0

$ sudo dmidecode -t memory
# dmidecode 3.1
Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.

Handle 0x0027, DMI type 16, 23 bytes
Physical Memory Array
Location: System Board Or Motherboard
Use: System Memory
Error Correction Type: Multi-bit ECC
Maximum Capacity: 64 GB
Error Information Handle: 0x0026
Number Of Devices: 4

Ran out of character limit, but I have 2x8GB of ECC 2400MT/s RAM.

The two modules themselves:

Handle 0x0030, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0027
Error Information Handle: 0x002F
Total Width: 128 bits
Data Width: 64 bits
Size: 8192 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM 1
Bank Locator: CHANNEL A
Type: DDR4
Type Detail: Synchronous Unbuffered (Unregistered)
Speed: 2400 MT/s
Manufacturer: Kingston
Serial Number: D134F7B9
Asset Tag: Not Specified
Part Number: 9965684-005.A00G
Rank: 1
Configured Clock Speed: 2400 MT/s
Minimum Voltage: 1.2 V
Maximum Voltage: 1.2 V
Configured Voltage: 1.2 V

Handle 0x0035, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0027
Error Information Handle: 0x0034
Total Width: 128 bits
Data Width: 64 bits
Size: 8192 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM 1
Bank Locator: CHANNEL B
Type: DDR4
Type Detail: Synchronous Unbuffered (Unregistered)
Speed: 2400 MT/s
Manufacturer: Kingston
Serial Number: CD34F6B9
Asset Tag: Not Specified
Part Number: 9965684-005.A00G
Rank: 1
Configured Clock Speed: 2400 MT/s
Minimum Voltage: 1.2 V
Maximum Voltage: 1.2 V
Configured Voltage: 1.2 V

truth

Oh yeah, and beware of the GA-AX470 Gaming 5. The X470 version of the same board does NOT HAVE ECC support.

Their site:
GA-AX370 Gaming 5: gigabyte.com/eu/Motherboard/GA-AX370-Gaming-5-rev-10#sp
>Support for ECC Un-buffered DIMM 1Rx8/2Rx8 memory modules
>* ECC function is limited if using an AMD Athlon™ 200-series APU.
GA-AX470 Gaming 5: gigabyte.com/eu/Motherboard/X470-AORUS-GAMING-5-WIFI-rev-10#sp
>Support for ECC Un-buffered DIMM 1Rx8/2Rx8 memory modules (operate in non-ECC mode)

Note the "operate in non-ECC" mode. It is not supported on the X470 board.

I read that ASrock confirmed that they enabled ecc for x370 boards. Twas looking at those.

>BASED
>INTEL
Pick one.

I believe ASRock's X470 boards also have ECC, but don't take my word on that. Go with ASRock anyway. I honestly can't recommend Gigabyte's boards simply because they are completely incompetent with UEFI.

I mean, it works, but I don't feel like I should legitimately feel scared of upgrading UEFI because something surely must've broken.

When will the i5 9600k hit retail? My i5 750 motherboard just died and I need a new computer quick

>My i5 750 motherboard just died and I need a new computer quick
just buy another motherboard...? cant cost that much, right?

or upgrade to a non-dead platform, dumbass...

>When will the new cpu comes out?
>"Upgrade to a new platform dumbass!"
Wow user, you sure are smart.

Why not just get a Ryzen 2600 and OC it or an i5 8400?

So what if i had four ssd/hdd, a gpu and a sound card with this high end cpu? Every PCIe-lane would be 1x? Fucking great.

How much is the actual TDP? 200W? What about all core turbo after an hour of use and not just the benchmarks? How much will Spectre microcode updates slow the CPU?

Intel has used my trust. I used to rave about my 6600k gum edition.

not him, but speaking about hardware security vulnerabilities.

Intel knowingly launched Coffee Lake 8th gen CPU after they had known about the vulnerabilities months before the launch. They even fucking rushed the Coffee Lake launch by several months in fact.

And these 9th gen will also have hardware security vulnerabilities. I think they are up to like 24+ vulnerabilities now (many different variants of Spectre, L1 terminal fault, Meltdown etc TLbleed so many names).

You think any tech tuber and tech press will mention that these new processors have hardware security vulnerabilities in them? No i didn't thinkso...

>paid shill
He no longer works for Intlel, he has been doing it for free for quite a while now, absolutely pathetic.

I am pretty sure new gen supports current LGA1511 socket and they all have soldered IHS. i9 will be little bit more than i7 so a lot of people are gonna buy it. Not sure if it will have benefits for gaming with core/thread ratio not better than i7 already. But that won't stop a single person

For the silent majority who care

Yeah, this was such a fucking short sighted move it hurts. Who the fuck except the paid shills trusts Intel anymore? They clearly just use their strong marketing to cover the weaknesses up. What hurts also is how it all works. Customers eat this shit up with a smile on their face.

Also, to me it seems marketing and excel money pushing management have taken over Intel long time ago. I don't think good engineers can be very happy with this. The engineers who are like that french twitter dude (every devils canyon cpu will go 5GHz etc.) don't care.

Holy shit sub 500 for 16 threads at 5GHz
Ayymd is literally finished, hope you sold your stock in time

>Sub $500
What does this mean $450-$499.99?
A 12 core Thread ripper costs that much on Amazon right now.

He thinks it’s a fire and not The Jews of Asia, South Korea, in a price fixing cartel-cabal!

TR has 24threads, 64 pcie lanes, and ecc.
I9-9900k 16 threads, 16 pcie lanes, and no ecc.

We all know that it's the hardware cartel.
They get caught every fucking few years.

That is actually just a decahedron

Post your predictions for the salt when benchmarks come out showing the 9900k wrecking AMD.

Attached: 4563548343253.png (653x726, 34K)

499, it's still a good deal, considering this CPU can be used for everything as it's both good at single threaded and multi thread workloads.

TR is a disaster, 4 glued together 8 cores with 70% of them disabled

At what? Vulnerabilities?

>499, it's still a good deal
You're not fooling anyone Moshe.
>16 pcie lanes
>No ecc
>Vulnerabilities
>Needs new mobo
>Probably has a shit cooler if any
TFW the more you buy the more you save with Intel.
Tfw $500 is a good buy for a mainstream CPU.
Fuck off with that bullshit.

AMD shills were attacking Steve's Twitter because he mentioned something 'really fast' and want him to shit on Intel's pricing for their 9th gen CPUs.

Don't be sourgrapes that you can't afford RTX + 9900k

That's why AMD exists, its literally the budget brand for PC hardware

2 HOURS TILL THE DEATH OF AYYMD HOUSEFIRES RYPOO GARBAGE

source?

Nice attempt at damage control, but it doesn't need a new motherboard, it runs on the mainstream 8th gen platforms, which means you get HEDT performance without needing expensive mobos like poo ripper.

Intel just lost another customer to amd today.

>It doesn't need a new motherboard
Oh that makes it slightly better.

>$500
>mainstream
For $500 they could add a few more pcie lanes, and ecc.

>unpack cpu box
>cardbord edge cuts my finger
>box fell on the floor
>it rolls i9
>tfw AMD btfo'd again

Attached: 776a1bd382ec798f15f690fea1dece99401f33651a8ec94422b6ce933f8fbf20.jpg (403x452, 53K)

1 HOUR TILL THE DEATH OF AYYMD HOUSEFIRES RYPOO GARBAGE

30 MINS TILL THE DEATH OF AYYMD HOUSEFIRES RYPOO GARBAGE

newsroom.intel.com/news/intels-fall-desktop-launch-event-livestream/

5 MINS

GET THE FUCK IN HERE NOW

>imagine if a car manufacturer knowingly released cars with faulty breaks
but they do that all the time

PAJEET

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>$530
>16 PCIE lanes
lmao

28 CORES

THANK YOU BASED INTEL

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

>Intel has raytracing
Kek

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: 1496098972845.png (882x758, 316K)

THANK YOU BASED INTEL'

AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT

Attached: 15390077131231005826055.jpg (2560x1280, 1.63M)

dodeheck?

Attached: kogler-5sm.png (1000x563, 1.19M)

Attached: kogler-2pi.png (1000x563, 907K)

fuck me. probably the only choice if you want to build a hackintosh. either that or a xeon.
fuck apple, they need to start making threadripper macs so I can build a TR hackintosh

HOW WILL AYYMD EVEN RECOVER

Attached: kogler-1F5.png (1000x563, 935K)

>showing a 1 year old CPU

>7890xe

What the fuck are they doing?

>28c intel cpu $5000
>32c amd cpu $1800

Is this a joke?

>s0iboi
stop being a shitlord. it's s0iperson

but 100 mhz higher boost bro!

The CPU without a CEO.

Attached: Captura de pantalla 2018-10-08 a las 16.14.23.png (444x896, 471K)

How else will people know its better if its not more expensive?

>Galaxy destroying desktops
nuclear housefire confirmed

>next year
when you will be 14? or are you one of those losers who play games as adults?

Did they announce prices already?

>CSGO champion
Cringe

>Gaming is now cool
sure nigger

Intel in charge of fire safety

Attached: 1426003938709.jpg (250x241, 11K)

this, I entered the stream and all of the sudden it's all just muh gayms

Is it cheaper to buy the AMD equilivant of the i9-9900k along with any motherboards or shit I need to run it than the i9? Does it work with all software and 1080 ti?

Yes/no?