/pcbg/ - PC Building General

>Create a parts list
pcpartpicker.com/
>Learn how to build a PC
Search youtube for a guide for your socket

Want help?
>State the budget & CURRENCY for your build
>List your uses; eg Gaming, Video Editing, VM Work
>For monitors, include purpose and graphics card pairing.
>Don't use Speccy. Use HWinfo, SIV, etc.
>For Win7 in Ryzen, refer to pastebin.com/TUZvnmy1

CPU
>R3 2200G - Bare minimum gaming(dGPU optional)
>R5 2400G/i5-8400 - Consider IF on sale
>R5 2600/X - Good gaming & multithreaded work use CPUs
>Wait for 9700k - Almost surely best for 1080p gaming
>R7 2700/X - Best high-end gaming/mixed usage on a non-HEDT platform
>Threadripper/Used Xeon - HEDT

RAM
>8GB - Enough for most gaming use
>16GB - Standard for heavy use
>32GB - If you have to ask, you don't need this
>CPUs benefit from fast RAM; 2933MHz+ is ideal

Graphics cards
>RTX 2000 cards are worse performance per $ than current GPUs. Just a marketing gimmick to rip off idiots
>Avoid cheap MODELS ie MSI Armor (Mk2 is ok), Gigabyte G1/Wf, ASUS dual, and others which have small heatsinks and low quality fans
1080p
>RX 570/580 /w Freesync or 1060 6GB are standard 1080p 60fps+ options
>1050 3Gb or RX560 4Gb for lower settings and/or older games
>GTX 1070Ti/Vega 56 if seeking higher FPS /w a high hz monitor
1440p
>Vega 56; 1070Ti/1080 if you already have Gsync
>GTX 1080Ti if seeking higher FPS /w a high hz monitor
4K
>Upscale from 1620-1800p. Maybe 2080Ti, but awful value.
OpenCL use
>Vega 64

Storage
>Backup before using StoreMi
>Consider getting a larger SSD (better GB/$) instead of small SSD & large HDD
>2TB HDDs are barely more $ than 1TB
>M.2 is a form factor, NOT a performance standard
>NVMe are not for gaming; See "More"

Display
>Consider 75hz minimum; 60hz are mostly old models.
>Always consider FreeSync with AMD cards
>PLAN YOUR BUILD AROUND YOUR MONITOR IF GAMING

Previous thread
More
rentry.co/pcbg-more

Attached: tenor.gif (332x332, 2.07M)

Other urls found in this thread:

techspot.com/amp/review/1655-core-i7-8700k-vs-ryzen-7-2700x/page2.html
pcpartpicker.com/list/Tp3xWD
youtube.com/watch?v=_oHO2lWKpOA
youtube.com/watch?v=p1Byh0zv43k
youtube.com/watch?v=YCZ5iP5cu8g
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

God I wish that were me

Suddenly, the 9700k is competitive.

8700k or 9700k?

Attached: jeebus.jpg (2048x1536, 431K)

Amdrones rushed to make a new thread ignoring to mention anything about the new cpus KEK

AMD BTFO AGAIN
CYA AGAIN IN 2020

Attached: i9_updated.png (910x1015, 235K)

Nigga make one, I just copy-paste that shit from my phone to keep the thread alive.
I've been asking you for days.

>8700k or 9700k?
2700X of course.

Western Digital Hard Drive or Seagate which brand is better?

>intlel
*yawn*

Attached: 1539006765415.png (678x924, 57K)

>cinebench
>multi-threaded

Attached: yep.jpg (1200x794, 121K)

WD. Barracuda Pro are a good series.

OH NO NO NO NO NO
AMD BOTH FINISHED IN GAMES AND CONTENT CREATION???? AHAHAHAHA

Attached: 15390105802691511345756.jpg (2560x1280, 1.46M)

I don't know who's a shill or not.

Intel or AMD, buying my parts today.

>Inno3D
>Zotac
>Palit
>Pny
>Gainward
Thoughts on those?

Make a build on pcpartpickers. State your use and budget. If you want Intel, wait a few days, 9th gen is coming.

Yeah, too bad Threadripper mops the floor with intlel pozzed stutterfire garbage.

Attached: AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-2000-Series_2950X.jpg (1024x576, 160K)

>I've been asking you for days.

Pajeets confirmed

Attached: 1494356435910.png (633x900, 162K)

Set brand loyalty aside and look up benchmarks relatively to price and to what you're planning to do.
Measure by how much % a change from intel to amd or vice-versa woud change the price of the whole rig and put it next to benchmarks relevant to you.

Literally who?
Kek, what did I say? Releasing new gen for $20 more.

I will have about $1500 just around Black Friday, is buying parts in that weekend worth it or should I wait?

availability in yurope?

No matter how much MOAR COARZ intel does AMD will always pulverize intlel garbage.

Attached: Ryzen-Threadripper-2000-2nd-Gen-CPUs.jpg (922x519, 205K)

Yes...for 600-700 euros

It will arrive, it better. They halted on making 8th gen so they can supply 9th gen.

No, it should be the advertised price in Euros(vat incl).
260$-260€ etc.

Attached: 1497880928990.png (653x726, 84K)

Keep posting outdated pics
Maybe you will b8 someone one day

Keep crying bitch nigga

Bobs lasagna.

So is this general pretty much a /v/ hangout on an incorrect board? Hard to explain this amount of brainless fanboyism otherwise.

On a tight budget here:
need a gta5/skyrimSE/fallout4 at 1080 med/high settings proof GPU.
AMD is preferred, used cards ar a-okay for me, location is Austria. budget is

If im considering a 2600X for gaming, does the new Intels give anything for that price with better performance?

Get a RX560 or 460 of cheaper.

Are you willing to sacrifice 6 threads for more money paid and slightly higher clockspeed?

We don't know yet, hold on a few days for benchmarks.

R9 280X is faster than RX560 though.

9600k for $20-30 will probably shit on 2600x. Or else the locked i5s but they are not out yet.

the 560 is at about 100-150€, out of reach for now. 460 seems allright. does someone actually own a rx460 here for first hand impressions?

The R9 280X has a better availability over here too, but has "only" 3GB, the 560 has 4GB. Much difference? Haven't bought a GPU since 2010, so I'm not exactly up to date about the requirements nowadays.

>9600k for $20-30
thats going to be $30-40

He does not look for fast, but good enough to run his games in FHD. The RX560 runs GTAV in Ultra at around 60fps, costs half less than the R9 in my country, has low profile cards and is also AMD.
Also, the 560 is cute af.

Attached: 14-137-308-V02.jpg (1280x960, 79K)

yall niggas said the 9700k would be about the same price as the 8700k, now im thinking of just going with amd even though i mainly want to play csgo which amd shits the bed with. does anyone know if the 2700x can get 200fps during peak stress at 1080p

The 8700k is $359, the 9700k is $379

That's 20 bucks

maybe im mixed up i just saw 450+

techspot.com/amp/review/1655-core-i7-8700k-vs-ryzen-7-2700x/page2.html

Attached: CSGO (1).png (1314x1192, 42K)

>does the new Intels give anything for that price with better performance
Nope.

Not that different. Actually your games might only use 4GB ram at most.

I doubt it could run Skyrim in ultra though.

> it's only 20 bucks bucko

He wants to run medium/high so he will run it manolo. GTA in ultra is bonus.

>8700k is $359
Not anymore lmao

I don't even need ultra settings at all, give me a nice mix of mid to high settings and I'm perfectly happy. Hell, I still enjoy Morrowind graphics. I want it affordable and stable. Nothing too crazy.
So theres nothing in the, say, 60 € range?

>280mm radiator
>can be positioned in 2 spots on front of case
>rad/fans above the psu shroud
>rad/fans bisected by shroud

Which position? Or should I just go for a 360mm which will take up the entire front?
>i5 8600k to be as high as possible while stable

Attached: 280 rad.png (799x601, 14K)

GeForce GT1030 or RX 550 kek. They are utter shit tho.

> putting your radiator as intake

Attached: 1538963132909.jpg (373x391, 39K)

pcpartpicker.com/list/Tp3xWD

Video editing, maybe video games @ max settings, music production. Thoughts?

Look for a used 750ti. Don't expect fireworks, but I had it and Skyrim ran fine on ultra settings 1080p/60fps, especially if you add some unobtrusive performance mods.

You might need to look at used GPU, well if you could find used R9 280X for that price then go for it.

>using water cooler

Looks good, but if I'm being pedantic, you're skimping a bit on the case for a build that good. I'd get something more posh, but it's not that important.

Is a Cl16 3200mhz 16-18-18-38 Hynix kit a good choice for an r5 2600? The cheapest Cl14 kit is 90€ more expensive. I'd rather put that money towards a 2600x and a good air cooler.

Attached: 1534716439289.webm (480x360, 954K)

Of course i'm looking for used cards, but the used marked here in austria (or in germany, for that matter) isn't that big, so availability is important.

Ryzen runs like shit without a Cl14 kit

14 vs16 is a pretty significant difirince in games, about 15% higher fps.

You're talking about a very marginal performance difference. The CL14 will be easier to tweak but if you don't touch ram you won't need it.

Kek, no. Sauce or you're a fag.

Looked into the 750ti, prices are nice, around 55€, benchmarks seem good to me too (ta5 on high 1080p around 40 to 60 fps is allright in my book.)

Thanks, m8, you were very helpful.

You think that is competitive?

Never

Yes

The 8700k is fast, has 12 threads while the 9700k has 8 cores, 8 threads and no HT

How often should I reapply my thermal paste? It's been a few years. Also, does anyone have that Gamer's Nexus webm? You know the one.

124 vs 141 is a 14% increase.

Attached: 1529462401968.png (1445x867, 234K)

As a side note, I had one until very recently and Yakuza 0 ran 1440p60fps on high settings. GJ Sega.

Thing amd does better don't count

>15 year old game engine

Intel just rebranded coffee lake and skylake-x, except for the overpriced 8 cores literally nothing is new

i dont know anything about pc parts can someone explain why they lowered the thread count

You can get away with once every 3 years or so, but optimal is once every month or two, especially if you are overclocking, that should be the maximum time between replications.

> on Hitman
Find me an average of all games tested.

I was talking about the 9700k not 8700k

>can I use ryzen without B-die RAM
If you don't care about performance at all then yes.
> I'd rather put that money towards a 2600x and a good air cooler.
Welcome to using ryzen...

are you mad that intel got cucked today?

Heres 14 games at 2400Mhz,
youtube.com/watch?v=_oHO2lWKpOA
heres Assassin's Creed Origins at 3200MHz
youtube.com/watch?v=p1Byh0zv43k

in general theres no difference, but for AMD cpus there is another factor, CL14 usually uses Samsung-B dies, CL16usually doesn't, which can be a massive difference in performance.

>128 phases with liquid nitrogen cooler is a must for your ryzen

seagate

Segmentation, more SKUs are better

If the 9700k had 8 cores and 16 threads they cannot justify selling the 9900k

Not sure why they don't have a 6 core, 12 thread part

Literally kikery

Hitman bottlenecks Ryzen like crazy, of course faster bandwidth will help. Stop giving shit buying advice intelfag.

Attached: Hitman.png (1314x1192, 51K)

goyim dont need threads

If I have a mobo that supports 3466MHz ram, will there be a noticeable difference between 3466MHz CL16 ram, and 3000MHz CL14 ram? Note both have almost identical true latency.

What if im using a Ryson and only the CL14 is B-die?

>difference is only about 10 frames
>even the minimum is basically 60fps
Does it really matter that much?

Is there anything inherently wrong with EVGA's SC Black cards? I noticed prices are starting to go down now somewhat and I noticed people are selling the Black cards cheaper than the other shit.

>did somebody imply anything less than complete satisfaction with an AMD product
>sounds like I have to step up my game and shitpost all dissent

Not everybody uses 60hrz monitors.
Some people find real value in having 120/144 minimums.

Motherboards confuse me
I'm looking to buy a 2700x, I'm planning on overclocking moderately, using one gpu and 16 gB ddr4 ram in the foreseeable future
What's the cheapest that I can get away with that'll deliver what I'm looking for and won't fall apart after one year?

Can someone explain why the fuck all benchmarks give the results as a bar plot (usually with only the 1% min and average, sometimes the median and 1% max as well) instead of a box and whiskers diagram?

Attached: 1538456064120.gif (400x220, 2K)

On the high end, yes. It may only be 10 frames, but that's a 15% performance boost. For a build with 1080ti, a jump from 2700x to 8700k will be much less than 15% price difference.

Bullshit.

One with lots of phases.

You shouldn't think I'm terms of absolutes, but percentages. It's 9% worst than its Intel counterpart with the best GPU of the time. So in case you don't go with a top tier card, the difference in absolute numbers will be less than that.

For some people it does matter, but I am fine with my 2600X.
Pic is averages in FHD.

Attached: 1080p_AVG.png (1324x1665, 101K)

Ia the G.Skill AMD optimized RAM worth buying or am I getting rused?

>youtube.com/watch?v=YCZ5iP5cu8g

Because bar plots let you do this.

Attached: Untitled.png (800x600, 8K)

Marketing, still a good ram.