How will computer programming be affected by quantum computing?

How will computer programming be affected by quantum computing?

Attached: qubit_615x344-520x291.jpg (520x291, 42K)

Other urls found in this thread:

tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-xmss-hash-based-signatures-12
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

not much at all, you will just use a library that will be faster than it was before. it will make some more things possible just because it's faster.

Nice pic op

faggot

Nice pic op

instead of C++ we will have C±

Nice pic op

Thanks lads

Best case: We'll be able to solve some classes of problems that were intractable in the classic computing model
Worst case: We'll cause the computer running our simulation to crash, destroying us entirely

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

Pretty nice pic op

That's a pretty nice pic op

By golly that's a pretty nice pic op

That's a pretty nice pic op you've got there

By golly that's a pretty nice pic op you've got there

that was uncalled for young man. wash your mouth out.

Damn op that pic is pretty good

Nice pic op

Goddamn hot and sexy pic op

Thanks guys, I really don't know how to process all this love.

don't you mean to quantum process?

Attached: bazinga-with-sheldon-tshirt-logo-hr.jpg (1071x999, 230K)

Shit pic op

Normal zeros could pass through too.

Nice pic, mind if I save it?

RSA and ECDSA will suffer from it, we'll need to invent a new kind of public key encryption.

Hey, op, came to say that's a really nice pic.

Nice pic op

I really really like this image

Nice pic, OP

Every time I come to Jow Forums it gets even worse

>we'll need to invent a new kind of public key encryption.
Already done and implemented in openssh. It's based on hashes.
>Add experimental support for PQC XMSS keys (Extended Hash- Based Signatures) based on the algorithm described in tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-xmss-hash-based-signatures-12 The XMSS signature code is experimental and not compiled in by default.

pajeets and mactoddlers

Yeah.
Wev'e got tards thinking quantum computers will be mainstream within their lifetime

Fucking faggot.

Nice pic op
prick

Stupid fucking faggot

Attached: 1505838998258.png (900x968, 468K)

Attached: 1.png (900x968, 422K)

Post-quantum cryptography is already a thing. That's the only thing most people will have to worry about for a while. Maybe in 50 years or so we will have quantum coprocessors.

Biological computing will become viable before quantum computing does.

quantum computers don't work .. it's the worlds biggest fraud (D-WAVE)

nice pic user

The chips Intel is working on actually work

oooooooooooohhhhhhh :]]]]]]]]]

ITT: faggots who think that if they keep repeating the same phrase it'll be an ebin meme like in their epic screencap collection

Attached: 1479829239971.jpg (600x600, 41K)

Breaking hashes would be faster.
Searching databases with billions of entries would be instantaneous.
Neural Networks & Machine learning can grow rapidly thanks to being able to analyze statistics and data at significantly faster speeds.

All this power will be for the top enterprise companies only, because cooling a quantum computer takes a significant amount of resources.

>Breaking hashes would be faster.
Completely false. You do not understand how quantum computing works at all.

>Searching databases with billions of entries would be instantaneous.
Yeah right.
Searching a database with 1 billion entries takes, at most, 1 billion steps for a classical algorithm.
A quantum algorithm currently available takes √1 billion steps

Nice pic op

Nice pic op

why don't the zeroes turn sideways too?

>Nice pic op

Security aside it'll only affect a few specialised areas, it's not like it'll fundamentally change programming.

Who are you quoting

Nice pic op

>Who are you quoting

the madlad did it

>That one extreme homosexual that has to quote everyone
Nice pic op

Nice pic op

i wish i was as smart as sheldon then i would understand science

no u

I think you have the best and worst case swapped but otherwise yeah

These Anons are right, OP's pic is nice

Why did you include me? I wasn't responding to OP's pic on that post
But this was me responding to OP

Are the problems solvable by non-D-wave approaches actually quantum? I thought we only had algorithms for energy minimisation?

Actually no idea. Maybe I was wrong. But I'll get more excited about quantum computing when we have something quicker than emulation of quantum computing.

now this is a nice pic op

Okay, now THIS is epic

destroying libtards with facts and logic like ben shapiro

Now that's a nice pic if I ever saw one.

Pic sucks. The yellow zeros would be able to get through the 1 hole by turning sideways.

That's the same that I thought. Your pic sucks OP.

Nice pic op

"humans won't invent a flying machine for another 3 million years"