10 Gb/s up and down for 108 USD
And how's your internet provider doing?
10 Gb/s up and down for 108 USD
And how's your internet provider doing?
Other urls found in this thread:
can get gigabit for 85/mo
about 70Mbps """unlimited"""for 70 a month with a 1TB cap in the fine print and you're charged up to 100 euro for going over it
It's free, I love it
I have a FTTC connection. Nominal 100 Mbps down, 10 Mbps up. Actual speed is more like around 60% of that over WiFi, 75% to 90% when connected directly into the router through ethernet. Costs roughly 50€/month.
1gb down 100 mb up for 27 usd including fiber optics switch and router
> avg montly salary in poland:
40 € for 100/100 FTTH. I like it because it's very reliable and there's zero congestion and throttling.
1Gbps for less than 10 EUR. Good enough.
KURRRRRRRRWAAAAAA!
>And how's your internet provider doing?
They won't even build the stuff to give me service.
>And how's your internet provider doing?
nuro.jp
~60$/month for 10down 2.5up gbps
Was internet always cheap in Japan?
>$57.75/m
>$356.46 construction cost.
Not bad
it was the cheapest in the world for years but i think south koera is even cheaper now.
Will they build 10g to anywhere in the country for the same price?
South Korean ISPs are targeting 50 Gbps for 2022.
For around $5, 512kbps. Really, the max download speed I've seen with this connection is 66kb/s.
100/100 Mbps Ethernet port in the wall. I guess it's part of the 400 € rent, which also includes electricity and water costs.
Also got uncapped "100 Mbps" 4G for about 26 € /month.
I use Virgin Media which is FTTC and then coaxial to the home. Currently on their top tier package of 350Mbit down and 20Mbit up for about £48 a month.
What is really more important here is what is your data allowance and are there any speed caps. And also what is the back end network like?
Residential internet is always contended and so your real max speed at any one time is typically less than your line speed especially during "peak" hours, there's many cheaper ISPs in the UK, some even offer free internet when you take out phone packages, but their backhaul networks are so over subscribed that a 100mbit connection rarely runs more than say 10mbit and they just hide behind an "up to Xmbit" advertising clause.
We have a 200Mbit leased FTTH over a 1Gbit bearer at work and that's like £800 a month. it's almost half as slow as my personal connection at home and 20x more expensive, but it's completely uncapped so there's truly no data limit. Where as if you ran you 350Mbit residential at max speed for more than say a few days, you'd face some kind of cap.
Personal connection speeds more than 1Gbit are silly anyway, most SSDs can't even write that fast, only makes sense in a shared environment of many people.
getting 100/40 in a month if im lucky with cable length
55 Merkelbux
FTTH would require me to dig in the cable myself
beat me to it
>"up to Xmbit" advertising clause
I was about to call you out but this is still correct. IIRC they were looking to change it so only average speeds could be advertised, but I'm not sure what the latest is on that. There was a lot of talk about getting rid of +line rental when prices were advertised and they did get actually rid of that.
I think they want to do that, but it's not part of the offcom guidelines yet. I expect it will do eventually.
most of the good ISPs actually give you a breakdown of what you can expect, this is why VM is so good because they actually deliver what your line speed is, in fact they slightly over deliver to account for the difference in 1000/1024 distinction (so I've heard), so my 350Mbit line runs at like 368Mbit or something like that at max speed.
But VM real speeds is basically about 98% of what they offer because they have a backbone that is fast enough to cope with the traffic, but then it's a lot more expensive, £48 is just for phone line rental and internet, nothing else. They advertise these averages freely on their site because they know they're basically the best at it.
german o2 by any chance?
I don't mind paying line rental but keeping it out of the price of broadband is fucking bullshit.
>15 ms ping on a connection that fast
> 1+ GB/s
10Gbps Ethernet is bloody overkill and useless for non-business usage patterns.
It only makes sense for as backboning two or more locations under the same WAN.
You aren't going to find a node on the internet that allow to allocate that bandwidth. You are going to hard pressed to find a torrent that has enough bandwidth available to saturated that connection assuming you aren't trying to download/upload on a HDD which will be a local bottleneck (NVMe SSD or RAID array of SATA SSDs is a requirement).
>1gb/s
>free
Noice
free for 4 months, then 25 euro
ping and bandwidth are not the same
Here's what they say
Don't believe a word. I get absolutely cucked by them.
I can't even image why anyone would need such speed at home
1Gbit up/down fiber $33 per month
$75/month in the US, no cap.