154 IQ

Tech evangelist
No programming if you don't want to, and you'll have to prevent your awe-inspiring levels of autism from putting people off whatever you're evangelizing, if only to avoid you

Posting your IQ online without sounding like an ass. Evidently you have work to do.

try CAD

Then he can publish nonsense papers nobody is ever going to review to keep the grant money flowing in.

theoretical computer science
semiconductor physics

>130+ IQ
>engineering degree
>still trying to get into med school in the US because I suck at reading abstract shit

Quantum mechanics

Improve the crypto ecosystem you'll get some big bucks and help people all around the world circumvent their governments.

>like dishwashing
Only boring people are constantly bored user.

If you can't find entertainment inside your own mind while doing something with your hands, your iq isn't that high.

If you weren’t a code monkey and decided to be creative and make something brand new and unique for yourself then you wouldn’t have this problem. You think you’re too smart for coding but in reality you’re too stupid to be innovative.

Attached: 4AF60A2D-7FA3-4969-9EEB-242D609D06D7.jpg (1834x1067, 155K)

LARP

the reason it seems menial to you is because it is. if only for the simple fact that you have no vision or creative drive.

Write a compiler then

>PhD in Math
>300k starting
>Any job I want

>92 IQ
>have a job I love and plenty of time to enjoy my hobbies

Attached: 3249.jpg (630x720, 33K)

Ur iq can’t be 92. R u sure

this or applied physics. go work for spacex if you want to challenge yourself. or just shitpost on Jow Forums like an baws.

Fixing issues in closed-source proprietary software that tends to glitch out, gets frequent updates and is mandatory for your corporate environment's core functionality.
Also, you need to use a thin client where you aren't allowed to install any additional software.

Personally, I fucking hate fixing black box shit but it certainly is challenging.

>be stupid enough to think that iq number means anything in real life
>>programming feels like a menial and tedious task
consuming js is not really programming
>what tech occupation challenges even the brightest minds?
the brightest minds are self-occupied [spoiler]most of them died trying though[/spoiler]

He said for science, not humanities

>I suck at reading abstract shit
>130 IQ
Sounds more like 80 IQ

>you’re too stupid to be innovative.
This. My to do list is as long as my ass hair but my Iq is too low to do all this and then there are people like
>hurr durr too smarts for everything
>hurr durr bored all the time because smarts uhh
These people make me mad.

create an AGI.

i've been programming for last 12 years, in the first 4-5 years, it was awesome, i would spend hours in forums answering questions, writing interesting software, learning new stuff everyday and so on.

next 3-5 years i was getting paid for my good work and it was motivational, i still could find programming challenges and still learn new stuff.

last a couple of years, i get bored as well, i've programmed everything i wanted, two mobile one desktop AV engines, 3 hobby compilers, interpreters, one hobby OS, one hobby emulator and two high load servers.

now i cannot find a challenging and fun project, maybe because i got older, or maybe because i programmed everything i used to envy. so the fun has gone.

tl;dr: the learning & exploring process is a lot more fun than the projects you do after you're a fairly good programmer.

maybe start ur own company?

1. You can literally do anything with code, that's its purpose, so if you think it's 'menial' and 'boring' then you're not applying yourself.
2. Unless you were tested by some organization like MENSA and can show (with timestamp) the actual official results of that testing, no one should believe you have an IQ of 154; online 'IQ tests' don't count.

i did lol, developing a PC game and working for one of my ex companies as a consultant.

>No one is going to review
>What does it mean to publish?

You understand that hard science is a dick-hard, I'm-better-than-you field, right? As in, in order to publish a paper (in a respectable journal, not the ones you pay to publish in that no one reads) you have to send it to a committee of randomly selected scientists that often are just looking to poke holes in your data and results? It's not exactly easy to publish a paper.

Don't be the garbage that stagnates the progress of humanity because you're salty about the D you got in physics because you're lazy ass couldn't get around to actually studying something for more than 5 minutes.

Tried to develope highly advanced AI?

that's a hobby

Transport planner.

All the dynamics of programming whilst babysitting whiney ass drivers.

Can't wait for AI self driving trucks.

tfw large vocabulary but don't know the correct pronunciations

Attached: 1528039452019.png (932x944, 241K)

You could spend your time trying to get a girlfriend instead of taking online iq tests and hanging out on Jow Forums bitching about things you fucking retard lol

actually i work on it. i have ~20 pages of notes and a grid like data structure to process input&output for AI, and i think i'm onto something.

here's a fundamental problem i face, maybe there's an answer for it but i don't want to read too much AI research because i don't want to develop any bias.

human brain can encode any type of data with only neural connections, this is unlike encoding everything with 1 and 0. yes, we encode both text and image in ones and zeroes in computers but these data types are not compatible.

we agree on some data encoding format first, and encode different types of data in different formats. the only natural data for computer is numbers. for instance, for ASCII text, we first agreed that A is 0x41 and thus if we see 0x41 we know it's A.

an example for further clarifying what i mean text and image data are not compatible. if we have a text file contains the word 'elephant' and an image file that contains an elephant image, we cannot relate these two information without previous knowledge, they are encoded arbitrarily.

we can however relate 11010001 and 00101110 in computers.

let's go back to brain, brain holds different kind of information with only neural connections but what's interesting is that, it can relate different type of information naturally.

for instance you see some flash light blinking in a pattern, and later you hear a sound with the same pattern and you can relate these two information. how's that possible?

i believe it's because we think completely abstract and before encoding any data to our brain, we first convert it to some abstract form. so this abstract form is like a intermediate data structure, everything first turns into that and then stored in brain. this data structure contains the patterns we perceive from different kind of inputs and we can match these patterns later on and relate them.

>150 IQ
Try jerking yrself off while a chinese guy shits in yr mouth.

>tfw you'll never be that good and it'll take five years to advance from junior at shitty outsource cheap labor company

fuck my life

Attached: ThinkCat37.jpg (3264x2448, 760K)

>have an IQ of 143
>programming feels like making fun stuff
Feels good to be a big dummy.

How do you know he has an IQ of 143?

Did he give any proof?

>God exists!
prove it.

Lets not believe whatever we read without questioning it.

This or do programming work in a field with a lot of use for mathematics such as image processing or Cryptography.

I would suggest pure math or maybe physics, but I'm not on your level so

if you're so smart work for google or be a developer for some major package that gets 100k downloads a day or contribute to a linux distro- idk theres so much shit out there that you could do if have a highly advanced brain

>what tech occupation challenges even the brightest minds?
technopriests

be a white collar monkey if you're so smart.

>100k downloads a day
?

Trading

math is kiddy abstractions of reality for brainlets
real brainers realize that life is meaningless and are content to watch the clouds

real brainers know math is completely detached from reality and are such free to explore any world they choose

>somehow implies that free grant money in exchange for nothing is bad
i know you tried to make academia sound bad but you're really going to have to try harder than that

wrong because math derives from the human experience which exists only in reality
you can't escape from a box by making a smaller box and hiding inside it

It's true, I'm pretty dumb. Doesn't bother me too much though

Why do dunning-kruger retards always default to around 150 IQ? What is it about that number that makes mongoloids who took an online IQ test to pick it?

You have spammed this nonsense in every goddamn thread for a long time. It’s horseshit, just stop

>Then he can publish nonsense papers nobody is ever going to review
we arent talking about gender studies

The more intelligent you are, the more boring menial tasks like codemonkeying get

same, too much reading and not enough speaking did that for me

If you're so damn smart, you should be able to figure it out yourself.

Ignorance is bliss. I am somewhat jealous of you user.

If you're so smart, then quickly program a mobile game that will make you rich.

Deep, if we understand the pattern better that form reality we can alter it to fit our needs better. By reducing the problems to a sizable amount and understand them we can then reapply them to reality and shape it to our wills.

You can not possibly analyze something as complex as "reality" in itself. Your head will explode. At best we can only make abstractions of it through math, language, ...

>you're smart therefore you must have shit tons of motivation and discipline.
mostly it's the other way around.

Ahh smart but lazy, classic

I want to hug you

Wiki says that 154iq is so fucking lot of people that it wouldn't fit in a room.

>125 IQ
who gives a shit you pretentious prick, go cure cancer if your so smart

Dumb and happy > smart and suicidal

totally redpilled

Attached: approved.jpg (360x294, 15K)

>intuitionism

Attached: 98409828384.png (305x341, 172K)

Even the purest of math magicians still use computers to do grunt work.

t.pseud
>implying abstraction makes the box smaller not larger
Nice thread tho.

You guys do not know what you are talking about. The most brilliant people I know have written some brilliant papers in math and CS which have incredible insights, and have been cited maybe 2-3 times. There are too many academics, writing too many papers, on too specialized of topics.

>using a computer at your job is basically being a programmer

What did he mean by this?

there are too many papers published and most of them are written in a overly technical language just to look serious.

it became impossible to read white papers because people are more interested in looking smart than actually conveying the ideas.

Definitely.

Also academia has only been professionalized on this scale for about 30-40 years, before that academia was much more general, much less social prestige, much less money.

at google they give people with his IQ helpdesk jobs.

I use a toilet at my job, but I'm not a plumber.

(continued)
academics self selected on much better criteria than the ones the profession selects for now

real brainers know that you make your own meaning user thus are god in your own reality.

Agreed.... Thats my point. That poster seemed to be saying even if OP studied pure math they would still be doomed to computers.

A toilet is not a tool used by plumbers, your analogy is retarded.

If you think you're smart that's a very good indicator that you aren't.

try making something useful

That's because his job is shitposting

it's tempting to think that way but let's be honest, most smart people know very well that they're smart.

You can think you are smart and have a healthy consciousness about how far that actually gets you, how smart other people are, etc.

wtf is wrong with US. Here, joining med school is even more harder than engineering.

I was that poster, and you say doomed like it's a bad thing. Scientists should know how to program to augment their work. Does this make them programmers or scientists? OP is probably too fucking lazy to do anything worth while anyway.

Lol, never gonna make it.

After a minimal threshold of intelligence, hard work and discipline wins every time. (Except solving inconsequential puzzles.)

The material isn't harder, but the social/academic competition is harder, and goes on for longer.

Med school and upper academia is just a tournament, with some asian kid who has been studying 12 hours a day since he was 8 in the other bracket.

I agree again... mathematicians should use computers. What are you trying to argue again?

A computer is like a bike for the mind, it lets you explore spaces you'd otherwise take too long to get to, and reach dead ends faster so you'd concentrate on roads that might actually lead to new unexplored amazing places.

The term programmers is such a loose big garment that anyone can get in but is hard to fill and wear to a fit, you have Donald Knuth say he's a programmer and is factually correct in saying so, Fabrice Bellard says he's a programmer too, Fabrice is indeed a programmer and he too along with Mr. Knuth are fantastic bike riders differing only in the terrains they're exploring, and then you have on the other hand Curry PooInTheLoo-kun with an impressive 154 IQ stating that programming is like a menial chore. Curry-kun is given a bike but like any 2 yo toddler is taking said bike and putting it in its mouth.

Programming is an exciting and a fantastic mental activity that takes actual brains to appreciate, go back to the hole you crawled out from Curry-kun, you ain't cut out for activities requiring the use of brains.