Cs6

cs6
>download from Adobe
>run keygen in sandbox/vm
>patch hosts
>done


Creative Cloud
>download from Adobe
>download some patcher from some Russian domain
>just click run bro :^)

Attached: 416rhOVJs4L._SX342_.jpg (342x342, 15K)

You could also try buying a subscription and getting the latest version along with support and cloud storage, you fucking criminal.

My company is actually subscribed to CC and pay Adobe every month.

Should I crash the next board meeting and tell them to stop being good goy NPCs?

adobe sues the companies that pirate its products, not the individuals
basically don't do that

>Not using Photoshop Portable

Wack

My portable versions stopped working after a certain windows patch.

this, but unironically

Use Affinity Photo you dummy

This

Where?

The sub is exactly why I won't buy it I pop open PS once in a blue moon to fuck off, usually throw some filters, a crop, a gradient to format a 16:9 landscape wallpaper into a portrait 9:16 720p for my phone or some shit. I'd gladly buy a copy, but I can't justify a subscription.

Don't buy one.
It's well known that Adobe will keep charging you forever unless you cancel your credit card.

You forgot the part where your PC gets turbo aids and literal hundreds of malware from said keygen/patcher

Or you can just use GIMP.

Attached: 1528618769269.gif (689x720, 375K)

>latest version
Yeah, no.

My roommate does that and enjoys constant crashes and even BSODs.
Never have that problem with CS5.

or just use ccmaker and install worryfree

Sounds like a problem with his computer unrelated to photoshop.

use Krita paranoid faggot

thethingy's cs6 upload best upload

>>run keygen in sandbox/vm
why? you're still going to transfer the patched file from the sandboxie/vm to your machine anyway

Amtemu doesn't have this problem

>letting a russian to compromise your entire system
retard

Literally download cs6 and run painter after doing a proper hash check.

>Adobe Photoshop is now a service

>doing a proper hash check
what's this even supposed to imply, dipshit

running a hash check won't de-botnet the crack itself

I'm saying amtemu has a decent backing behind it. It doesn't help that antivirus don't care whether something is actually a virus or a "hacktool"

>closed source
>third world developer
yup it's safe to assume it'll infect your computer with something nasty and it will hit you hard when you least expect it to happen

Maybe it will user but it's been working fine for hundreds of thousands of people since 2016 with no network activity and no startup activity. I guess we'll see. Out of curiousity what do you use to get photoshop then?

>with no network activity and no startup activity
Hahahahaha I would love to see you desperately prove that.

>inb4 this user is just upset because he paid 300 dollars or whatever to use photoshop or is using gimp or some other inferior software

Stop making asinine assumptions based off of nothing and prove your claim.

Through sandbox analysis no servers were contacted and there was no modification of startup files by the software. You still haven't answered my question user

Attached: Cc4_4BlWAAAQBwk.jpg (600x455, 39K)

Still no proof? Typical mongoloid.

Okay let's assume I'm now part of Ivans botnet. What do you suggest would be a better way of getting photoshop that can 100% be proved to be safe without costing me hundreds of dollars

op here my friend finally got it working

just downloaded a custom amtlib and overwritten the existing one

cs6 you didn't need to replace any files. all you had to do was do offline activation and patch the files.

looks like all these new tools does is place the file for you. there's literally no reason to not give you the file itself and have you drop it in the folder yourself.

instead they include some questionable program and obfuscate the fuck out of it to...overwrite a file. shit needs root permission as well wtf

laughinggalaxyhomer.jpg

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-10-13 at 9.03.33 PM.png (3066x1736, 776K)

>with no network activity and no startup activity

Prove your claim and I'll answer all of your question(s).

>what is ccmaker

The keygen isn't the only place to embed malicious code. You do understand that the librray file contains code itself right, and that those pieces of malicous code can be executed during a run of Photoshop right? No, it doesn't seem you understand how compiled libraries work at all, so just nm.

How good is it compared to Photoshop?