Corporations

What the fuck is wrong with corporations? I'm looking for a job and I heard already from like 4 companies that they work 8 and a half hour and the half hour is unpaid obligatory break. Can someone explain me why they want to fuck their employees so bad?

Attached: evil_corp_wallpaper_by_nextsource-da46iji.png (2560x1440, 51K)

It's full time and the break is mandatory by the state.

THEY ARE MAKING MONEY FROM YOU, retard.

Net gain from employing you and profiting from your work.

>Can someone explain me why they want to fuck their employees so bad?
Because they can.

But you must be a pajeet to agree for something like that. In one of these companies they also told me you need to be at least 15 minutes before work starts. So it's already almost 9 hours and they pay for 8. How 45 minutes of slavery is legal?

because USA works you like dogs

break is mandatory, the half hour might be the team meeting at the end of the day or false sense of going home early plus cover on overtime

It was EU country, but it could be some USA influence because in one of them they told me that not working days are the same as holidays in USA not in my country

Yea but in most of companies (at least all I worked in) they fucking paid for breaks.

also I think half an hour for 8 hours of work is not enough.

Is it a large corp? If they have hundreds/thousands of employees, they save quite a bit by doing this.
47*5*30 = 7050 = 117.5 hours every year per employee.

Would you want to pay for a hundreds/thousands of people to have lunch for three working weeks?
It's nothing personnel kid, just join a small/midsized company.

>Would you want to pay for a hundreds/thousands of people to have lunch for three working weeks?
Well quality is important, and I don't think they will get any quality workers with these standards.

>the half hour is unpaid obligatory break
Why would you be getting paid for not working?

Yeah, but at that point it's a numbers game.

Why would I be forced to get unpaid break?

communism

Where do I get software jobs with 6 hour work days or 4 day work weeks or 1 hour free lunches and < 10 min commute?

You can't on the one hand complain about companies treating their workers badly, then on the other hand complain that companies are giving their employees time for lunch.

it's one thing saying you can get lunch and other thing saying you have to.
I understand they work that way, and I will just pick companies that offer paid lunch time, but it is just weird for me that people agree to something like that.

Also kind of, they are wasting my time, because nowhere in the offer it states that and they say shit like that on the face to face interview when you need to come to their office, and when I know that I'm not going to work in their company. At least now I know something like that is happening and I always ask on the phone about working time etiquette.

This.
It's called exploitation, and required under capitalism.
Become a communist already, and fight exploitation and oppression of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie.

Attached: 220px-Karl_Marx_001.jpg (220x278, 24K)

In communism if there would be the break, ALL companies would have to make them sooo, maybe no.

You can fix this by taking 30 minute shits every day. Now they're paying you to shit.

The mandatory break is forced on them by the state, the oppression is then passed on to you.
As far as why you have to work 8 hours a day, it's because you're not worth the hassle of hiring you for less than that.

In communism, there are no companies.
Do you even read marx, bro?

If it makes you feel better, why factor in the 30 minute break into your hourly wage and think about it that way? If comparing two companies, you'll have a more consistent comparison for your wage.

I work 42h/week (8h 24m per day). 20m break is included in the paycheck.
I'm Swiss. Can somebody enlighten me how bad you think this is? Most people work at least 40h/week in Switzerland.

You find it strange that people agree not to get paid when they aren't working?

This user is right. In communism there is only starvation.

You are free to employ yourself. This means you are free to take the financial risk to do so. Or would you rather feel safe and contract your work to someone else?

If they make it optional, some employers will pressure there workers to work nonstop without a break to eat. That is the reason it is required, to remove the grey area where exploitation can happen and be denied.

They don't have a choice in the matter, the state forces it upon them. They don't want to offer a paid break, so they have to waste your time with an unpaid one to (((comply))).
Protip: In most places you can elect to take the break at the very end of the day and just leave.

Not quite, there's also typically huge bandit gangs raping and murdering. That's a sort of company.

Just don't work for abusive companies if you can't handle it. That way they have to pay more in order to entice the more productive workers who can take it.

Nah, in communism the workers own the means of production and there is no government, so people can just chill out and distribute all food among themselves, so no one starves.

Set up some meetings, do some training courses and participate in some of the charity stuff. Play the game.

And what if someone says, "Hey, fuck these twats, I think I'm going to keep what I worked to produce,"? Whoever holds the gun to his head and redistributes his wealth is the government. Since power always corrupts, this government will favor its interests. Then some poor old lady dies in Sibera while Moscow has a huge party celebrating the success of communism.
Don't get me wrong, anarchocommunism would be perfect if not for all the people fucking it up, but the entire spectrum of leftist ideologies fail to account for the fact that they are dealing with humans and not emotionless commiebloc robots. You can have as many of those as you want but so long as one real human exists they will fuck up your entire system by establishing a hierarchy with themselves on top of all the perfectly equal commiebloc serfs.

The entire spectrum? You must be from the USA, social democrats / democratic socialists and so on brought much needed reforms to europe and had no less success at governing (also no more, turns out being administrative genius and getting good predictions to base decisions on isn't easy even within the spectrum of not insane politics) than the other successful majority parties.

The entire spectrum. Everything left of center is, invariably, delusional fantasy.
>You must be from the USA
I'm from Denmark.
I know much of "social democrats" and "democratic socialists"; cute names for communists. They are only making these "reforms" (which do not deserve that name as they are in fact just temporary smokescreens) by pushing their problems into the future with Keynesian hocus pocus that cannot be sustained. Hyperinflation abound and an import market marred by overdependence on the artificially reduced price of the US dollar as subsidized by the US taxpayer.
>not insane politics
>majority parties
Yes, quite. Garbage is as good as garbage. Eventually the bandit mob writ large will run out of things to steal no matter who leads it nor for what purposes.

Or you could work for the gubmint and be the one doing the exploiting :^)

>when you pay taxes out of your salary which goes to pay your salary which you get for processing taxes

Attached: 1529989320718.jpg (1500x1500, 781K)