Media reports published today that Intel is ending work on the 10nm process are untrue...

twitter.com/intelnews/status/1054397715071651841

>

Media reports published today that Intel is ending work on the 10nm process are untrue. We are making good progress on 10nm. Yields are improving consistent with the timeline we shared during our last earnings report.

>BELIEVING THE LIES OF AN AYYMD ASSLICKER DEMERJIAN

Attached: CharlieBunny.jpg (499x399, 52K)

>MAXIMUM DAMAGE CONTROL
oh so that is why the stock hasnt tanked, they got their own (((media))) teams handling this.

i cant recall the last time intel took to twitter to debunk "rumors" about them
must be nice being on the knifes edge of the new pajeet overlord :^)

>Intel pays shekels to company to claim AMD processors are insecure.
>AMD pays pajeets to post everywhere that Intel fab is broken.

This is why we need RISC-V. It's time to break the bind of x86 and x86-64 monopoly. It's a shit architecture that's had sticking plasters put over it for the last three decades to keep it relevant, with an unhealthy symbiotic parasitic relationship with a shit closed source operating system.

I hope both Intel and AMD burn.

But will it run Crysis?

Who fucking cares about games except children?

>implying intels fab isn't broken
>10nm 4 years late
>14nm took a full year to actually start producing high clocking big die parts after all the intial 14nm chips were total failures
>after desktop Coffee Lake was continuously delayed
>and then made end of life after being in production just 3 months
>because intel was losing money on each chip sold
>for a $350+ part

RISC-V is an open ISA and the various implementations of it are so schizophrenic that its impossible to have across the board support for it. Its a bigger mess than ARM by a long shot.

Gaming is $120 billion a year industry.

Attached: KINGOFBEERS.jpg (1300x1013, 306K)

>linux can't game
>convince yourself on 12 year olds play games in order to feel more mature
>I d-don't even n-need it! b-btw the new AMD chip is fantastic for gaming. Take that Intel Aviv
Peak sour grapes.

Now calculate how little of that is exorbitantly priced "gaymur CPUs" (z370 motherboard, 1080p 144hz monitor and 1080ti not included).

Gaming is for children and the unemployed.

Loot boxes and play to win is expensive after all.

>conjecture
>baseless claims to feel like a big boy
>projection
Good lord the absolute state of Jow Forums

Attached: 1516282194236.png (593x635, 260K)

>Boasting about being fucked in the ass for how much a game costs, when you still get charged for shit that should have been in the game at the start, and also get charged to make the game easier to win.

It ceases to be a game when it doesn't come as a finished product and you cheat by credit card to win.

>>projection
How is stating that loot boxes and play to win is expensive, projection? Or are you just using buzzwords you don't understand but see posted on Jow Forums all the time?

Multiplayer games are for faggots. Christ you don't actually play multiplayer like some retard do you?

You think single player games make up the bulk of that billion dollar industry? Get the fuck out of here.

You fucking idiots are saying chip manufacturers should completely ignore gaming? Christ you mongoloids are terrible at business.

Attached: chrome_2018-10-23_02-42-02.png (1142x881, 68K)

#rekt

> delet this

10nm being an unmitigated disaster was already priced in

brainlet here, what does 10nm mean

Attached: DF50B81B0D2847A0907FFF9F54F00F4A.png (655x527, 360K)

It means the greatest tech Intel researched to BTFO competition.

Does 10nm mean faster?

Not if you're intel

It means more cores, at least, better clocks at the same TDP or better TDP at the came clocks, since voltage on a smaller node process is lower. It all depends on the process, ofc. Example, AMD Ryzen 1st gen couldn't reach past 4GHz but were alright at thermals. Not the case for Intel, though, they're always doing high perf chips, not low power.