woah
Attached: jJ67j_LtZ-uzdXVVwwY-a5WM32yq1301_WX33GkcSh8.jpg (578x767, 118K)
woah
Other urls found in this thread:
naughtygits.com
redbubble.com
twitter.com
pretty ugly
is it a """she"""?
Probably has a ding a ling, yes
Manlegs lol
>js
sorry, i dont date faggots
Learn the rules!
Everything on Jow Forums that is not a computer or phone has a dick!
And sometimes the computer has one to!
>thigh tattoo
Yikes.
>javascript
this
wonder if somebody thought about a lorem ipsum generator using apparently random code
where's the bulge?
faggot.
Guess """her""" hair color
brunette with pink frosted tips
yeah what's more funny is the place where you can buy such dress:
naughtygits.com
>smash(patriarchy);
faggot.
>feminism
*throws up*
Turquoise, with blonde roots from being inherently lazy due to mental illness
What the fuck
Why is it still acceptable to use terms like "mansplaining"? I can't imagine a bigger red flag of mental illness and insufferable ego, than actually thinking in those terms.
The only thing worse than a notch in a screen is a bulge on a "woman".
yeah we all love dicks
I love attention and i'll do anything
Now give me some...
it's called internship program
This desu
>One day, while trying to debug an issue with Gulp, I spent a few hours looking at minified code.
Why would you debug minified code? Fucking read the original source code or un-minify it if you don't have access to it.
this 2bh, however, I'd fap on it given the chance
What if the problem is related to minification and the build system rather than code that is built?
Jannies pl0x deletion reddit tier post
damn so this is what a coder looks like....
he's so cute
queen of Jow Forums
>not trapcode
is that azores
isn't that just some random fag?
Of course. Chicks with dicks make the best programmers.
Women in STEM was a mistake
>javascript
No thanks.
>obfuscated
Disgusting. Not for human eyes.
sudo ! !
that faggot looks like he smells of shit
There are no chicks with dicks, only dudes with tits.
>I spent a few hours looking at minified code.
>a few hours
I've spent days stepping through minified JS in Chrome's debugger to reverse engineer a site's API in order to scrape it.
>un-minify it
You can pretty-print it, but you don't get back the original variable names. Plus, if you're reverse engineering a site that someone doesn't want you to, there are various obfuscation techniques that can be applied. There's JSFuck and aaencode, which has existing reversers. But then there's weird shit, like mapping all operations in functions, which all go into a global dispatcher object. Or randomly reordering all statements in a block into cases of a switch statement, then a loop is wrapped around it so the statements can be executed in order.
But then sometimes you find fun little easter eggs, like pic related
Epic style (dude)
redbubble.com