These are the facts

You know what would be really nice?
If you actually gave the names for the addons on the chart

adblockplus.org/fr/acceptable-ads
There is no acceptable ads.
Also they received shitload of money from the companies on this list.
Also used to be pajeet-tier code and run like shit.
ublock uses the same lists, there is no reason to use both.

>uMatrix
>every website is broken
>need to disable it on each website

Yes goy, who needs encryption?

You should be blocking all that nonsense to begin with.

If you somehow run into that issue often then fair enough.

A high IQ individual, I see.

No.
>don't block all kinds of shit
>b-but at least I locally fetched my cloudfare css or whatever the fuck it serves

You only need to know the top 4 anyway.

What's the one with the HTTPS green banner at the top, presented as an alternative to HTTPS Everywhere?

Because I also use ublock+umatrix+https everywhere

Smart HTTPS, in the end does the same as HTTPS everywhere but works a bit different.

>EFF HTTPS / russian HTTPS
HTTPS by default is the only one that matters

Ah I see

>These are the facts.
How about some explanations about each tier and why certain extension are there?

nsa pls go

You can turn that option of brainlet

Attached: 1520726281075.jpg (1024x1008, 586K)

From top to bottom:
- Content blocking and browsing over https is critical.
- Speaks for itself. UA switching can't be done conveniently in about:config and may have its uses. Same for cookie management, though you should be blocking most anyway, and I think cookie autodelete does not work with privacy.firstparty.isolate which can be important.
- Seems obvious. You can get the same results by changing about:config.
- May not actually be shit but they're redundant when you're blocking most content in uMatrix already, like you should. And even if you allow something in uMatrix, you have uBlock's filter lists to fall back on if it contains tracking stuff.
- These just have better alternatives or are literal spyware (ghostery).
- Literally just open a container.

Or you could learn how to use it properly.

Could someone name them as I only know half of them?

Completely heuristics based, it might catch something that isn't in the privacy/tracking lists but it well miss most, it's also really lenient on trackers to avoid breaking stuff and even then it breaks stuff
Privacy Possum it's better if you don't want lists or only care about economically oriented tracking

>decentraleyes is placebo

How the fuck? Every request not made to botnets' servers is a victory.

mandatory config for SmartHTTPS

Attached: smarthttps.png (502x101, 5K)

This, OPs list it's pretty brainlet tier

Facebook container isn't just for Facebook users. It also blocks all Facebook elements on other pages. Variants also exist for Google and Amazon.

Attached: 1533287852342.png (2560x3398, 752K)

[spoiler]please explain to a brainlet[/spoiler]

What if I've disabled canvas in about:config AND I use canvasblocker? Why isn't a user agent switcher on the chart?

Because it makes things easier to set up right. The more correct way is to spend hours blocking things and checking that they're blocked fully to get the same effect without a little badger head in your toolbar.

why do people hate ghostery?

it's how much time it takes to open a page.

Without adblocker it's 12 seconds

most adblock and adblock plus reduce it to 9-10 seconds

ublock origin reduces it to 3 seconds

They were caught selling your browsing data.

I need to be redpilled on why Ghostery is considered "shit." Is it because it doesn't block everything by default?

see

Good "Grandma" stack (improves experience/removes tracking with no interference necessary):

uBlock Origin
HTTPS Everywhere
PrivacyBadger
DecentralEyes

It'll make your browsing experience faster and nicer without any maintenance.

Move uMatrix below.
Move https shit to placebo.
And move Facebook containers to mandatory. It and uBO should be integrated in Firefox.

You're wasting resources doing nothing then. uBlock Origin does a lot more than ABP for a lot less CPU power.

Honestly you just need the first two of that list. DecentralEyes feels more like placebo than anything else, specially if the target user is "Grandma"-tier

What does PrivacyBadger do that is so valuable to a grandma?

Nothing other than uBlock Origin is necessary.

>https addons
NO HTTPS BY DEFAULT, NO CLICK, FUCK YOU

Brainlet here.

How do I combat anti-anti-adblockers with my Ublock/Umatrix setup? Some of them I can zap away no problem, but others are more clever and seem impervious to that technique.

It's probably the only thing standing between me and a perfect browsing experience, whenever I run into one of those.

Attached: 1540345207817.png (895x772, 790K)

github.com/cowlicks/privacypossum

DecentralEyes is probably placebo, but in my experience it makes some things load pretty fast since they're locally cached. As for PrivacyBadger, it catches some tracking that uBlock Origin doesn't and doesn't slow down your experience. It errs on the side of "don't break websites" but it'll catch on earlier than uBlock will update their lists, sometimes.

Use anti-anti-anti-adblockers

Kek
I misspoke, I guess I meant "How to combat anti-adblockers with UblockOrigin/Umatrix"

>inb4 use anti-anti

I don't know what to believe anymore. I have uBO, uMatrix, and HTTPS. But also CanvasBlocker, Privacy Badger, Decentraleyes, and CookieAutoDelete. If I can get rid of some with good reason I'm willing...

I would also like to know...

Where's EditThisCookie?

Please explain how to replicate canvas defender in about:config, did firefox finally add proper anti-fingerprinting stuff?

Also, Decentraleyes is absolutely not placebo. Your explanation of "uBlock and uMatrix should already block everything" is definitely valid for privacy badger and shit, but when a website uses a JS library hosted by google blocking it usually breaks the website completely. Without Decentraleyes your only choice in this case is to allow the request to Google or whatever other botnet CDN.

Literally just blacklist facebook in umatrix you nigger, why the fuck would you need an entire addon for that?

Aye, and people ITT are forgetting that decentraleyes strips data from the CDN requests, improving your privacy.

>https everywhere
Won't work for sites not in the database
>smart https
Vulnerable to downgrade attacks

Should both be used for maximum security? And is it possible to make a better "mandatory https" scheme?

>decentraleyes
>placebo

retard tier: (You)

Create a browser which only accepts HTTPS and refuses anything else.

if(https)
k;
else
le_no;
end is

What's wrong with Containers? Or is this referring only to Facebook Container?

No Vim Vixen? Once I spent a week with it, it's never leaving my fingers.

fite me irl you pieces of shit!

Attached: file.png (816x164, 17K)

why noscript is shit tier?

>dat scripting
we're not spying on you goy, honestly!

>>https everywhere
>Won't work for sites not in the database
What? I don't think that's how it works. That would be retarded actually.

umatrix is confusing.

What's the blue s and the chart?

It's about addons so yes, only referring to fb container.

>grandma stack
I like it.

noscript > umatrix
babbys are upset it doesn't work on botnet browsers.

Icecat finally went to the new awfulness and I no longer have my cookie manager - What can I use to edit cookies on this new one?

So what's the difference between medium mode UBO and UMatrix? Seems to do pretty much the same thing.

Pihole here

Where my AdNauseum niggas at?

What does it do for sites not in the database then?

>did firefox finally add proper anti-fingerprinting stuff?
Yes, long time ago. See privacytools.io

Noscript also blocks iframes and js attacks

Isn't it finished ?

That doesn't answer my question though, how do I spoof canvas readouts in a sensible way? Last I checked I didn't see any options to do that but I might have missed them.

privacy.resistFingerprinting - set to true will make it identical to other browsers with this setting enabled.

uBlock, ABP, https everywhere and webrtc blocker master race here. Yes I know ABP is redundant. So is privacy badger, since I already block everything and it can't learn shit because of it.

I hope you faggots are using a decent VPN alongside all those add-ons

It's watered down to shit and basically fucking useless at adapting nowadays
Use unlock origin

>You should be blocking all that nonsense to begin with.
Privacy Badger will block stuff that isn't in the lists, even before they reach the lists. With Firefox Tracking Protection using the aggressive lists and Privacy Badger a user theoretically doesn't need anything else. The problem is that it might take some time for it to block all trackers, and that it might miss trackers that use a different subdomain.
It's unnecesary. Firefox now has canvas protection and it can be toggled on/off on a per-site basis by clicking on the shield besides the URL bar.
Facebook Container is not for users who want to block Facebook. It's for users who want Facebook, but don't want to be tracked in other websites by them.
That's exactly what it does: eff.org/https-everywhere/atlas/
You don't need to. With privacy.resistFingerprinting set to True Firefox spoofs the Tor Browser canvas and the browser will ask if you wish to give away your "real" canvas if a website needs it.

>placebo in mandatory
Yep. it's Jow Forums alright.

What's wrong with google and facebook containers? They just automate something you should do anyway.

What does this setting do, exactly? Brainlet here.

Attached: 1518848746922.jpg (500x500, 54K)

Regex to load everything in HTTPS. . is any character, * is any number of these type of characters.

Good stack, I use the exact same.

>containers
>at bottom
I know Jow Forums is chock full of retards but jesus christ

This. Believing you need a datasheet download to be under TLS means you're a faggot with USI.

Move uMatrix to autism tier and ghostery to botnet tier.

If you're already using UO then it's pretty much redundant.

Wtf are any of these besides ublock and https everywhere

what's the big point to use umatrix on top of ublock if it has dynamic filtering already

Snake oil for uneducated skiddies.

> I use it in conjunction with uBO
my god, some people are just complete retards

Could anyone give me a rundown on these

I switched from ABP to uBlock to be Jow Forums approved some time ago

HTTPS everywhere is pretty self explanatory

But what do these other things do?

This is a privacy-oriented list.

And Tridactyl is better.

>allowing man in the middle to replace the content on your website with arbitrary shit in the age of free SSL cetrificates is perfectly okay because "it's just a data sheet"
low IQ

I don't understand the purpose of uMatrix when uBlock does the same with advanced option ticked on.

> canvas blocker

This add-on can:

Access your data for all websites
Access browser tabs

THE FUCK?

Access your data for all websites

/* Read product and price information from a page to help find you the best price on items you're shopping for */
/* Offer a password manager that reads and writes details of your username and password*/
/* Provide an ad blocker by reading the content of each web page you open to find and remove ad code */

GTFO OP