>Now with reCAPTCHA v3, we are fundamentally changing how sites can test for human vs. bot activities by returning a score to tell you how suspicious an interaction is and eliminating the need to interrupt users with challenges at all. reCAPTCHA v3 runs adaptive risk analysis in the background to alert you of suspicious traffic while letting your human users enjoy a frictionless experience on your site.
>normal FF main profile 0.9 >private browsing 0.7 >seamonkey from I'm not even logged in 0.9 >chromium 0.9 >niggernet exploder not even loading kek >tor browser, default settings 0.1
Only android and chrome users would be able to post
Logan Gonzalez
And since ever hosting service that allows user interaction besides reading the content would obviously implement this for spam protection Google will gain massive control over the entire internet.
My prediction for the future: -Soon you will be forced to use Chrome to pass the check -adblockers will be banned from implementation in Chrome to force you to watch ads to the fullest extent -Google rules the entire internet which will be just one massive ad reel on repeat
Jaxon Anderson
>false >0.1 Fuck yes
Aaron Scott
So the lower your score, the less access Google has to your data?
Jaxson Morales
Kind of.
Nathaniel Richardson
I don't use any Google services, don't accept any of their cookies and keep the number of requests to their servers to the absolute minimum by perma-caching all resources from their CDNs that third-party sites require. Wouldn't you know it, my """trust score""" is 0.1.
Gavin Harris
I can't even create a Twitter account anymore
Connor Hill
Why would you nedd a twatter account in the first place?
Jordan Mitchell
I have this pajeetphone F1 that has a touch screen issue and I wanted to tweet it to Poco
Owen Russell
>0.1 Good to know Skynet hates me back.
Sebastian Robinson
>firefox on android >0.3 what
Parker Ortiz
You'd have better success on their forums.
Samuel Perez
>0.9 Shit, I gotta get these google dicks out of my ass.
Elijah Brooks
This is pretty spot on, considering how they lured content creators and users on Youtube, only to give all of them the dick later.
Not to mention being locked out of websites cuz the big G can't fingerprint and profile you, like Cloudflare for example.
> Do not raise issues regarding the score you see here. Hmm
Juan Barnes
>Pay money to avoid captchas H-Heh
Jaxson Parker
>Admins can adjust the threshold You know damn well Hiro will crank it to the max so you buy a Jow Forums pass
Bentley Morris
Edge, Android, 0.3
Jeremiah Murphy
>logged in to google 0.9 >not logged in 0.7
I hope EU fines their asses, thats like clear monopolic shit
Lucas Robinson
Fucking scary
Isaiah Robinson
How come I get a pingback from Haliburton? >inB4 reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Austin Lopez
What you dodos don't get is that as you continue to post your score will get lower and lower until eventually you will not be able to post because it thinks you are a bot for posting too often.
William Diaz
>pass with 0.7 score >clear all browsing data >don't pass with 0.1 score It's gonna keep out anyone who's not a complete normie.
Kayden White
fresh install of W7 using waterfox
0.3, failure
lol. this is going to be the default and youre going to get kicked off most sites if you can't pass.
Ethan Stewart
in eww The reCAPTCHA v3 API provides a confidence score for each request.
NOTE:This is a sample implementation, the score returned here is not a reflection on your Google account or type of traffic. In production, refer to the distribution of scores shown in your admin interface and adjust your own threshold accordingly. Do not raise issues regarding the score you see here.
1 reCAPTCHA script loading 2 grecaptcha.ready() fired, calling grecaptcha.execute('6LdyC2cUAAAAACGuDKpXeDorzUDWXmdqeg-xy696', {action: 'examples/v3scores'})' 3 Received token from reCAPTCHA service, sending to our backend with: fetch('/recaptcha-v3-verify.php?token=abc123 4 Received response from our backend: {"json": "from-backend"}
I can only get 0.9 if I am logged into Google using Chrome.
Adrian Wilson
>0.7 >clear cache and cookies >0.3
Carson Young
Even reCAPTCHA v2 fucks off right away if you're logged into Google and use Chrome.
Luke Taylor
>0.1 So, I guess 0 is 100% bot, so I'm 10% human, according to google… Seriously, WTF? I'm not even running anything special. I could understand that they are having "problems" to judge what a TOR user or someone running full-on no-script is up too, but Opera with just ubo and nothing else?
Jose Bailey
Why the fuck are they pushing this shit out now anyway when it's not even working?
Parker Wilson
i guess it is working for the average normie tard with 500 goolag cookies on his browser.
Jace Davis
I assume that classifying you as a bot if you don't let Google track you is a feature.
I hope the EU bans recaptcha implementation on all sites serving or hosted in the EU. FUCK JEWGLE WASTING HOURS OF HUMAN LIVES
Thomas Long
Based Lali
Hudson Kelly
I LOVE OUR SAINT
Blake Baker
>had to manually block google from setting cookies/data even with whitelisting >..in firefox have i escaped the botnet yet.. { "success": false, "hostname": "recaptcha-demo.appspot.com", "challenge_ts": "2018-10-30T15:35:10Z", "apk_package_name": null, "score": 0.1, "action": "examples/v3scores", "error-codes": [ "score-threshold-not-met" ] }
Hudson Long
You must be an NPC in order to join the botnet.
Michael Hill
>"success": false, >"score": 0.1, noice
ps. Error: You seem to have mistyped the CAPTCHA. Please try again.
I get 0.1 with Firefox + uMatrix. Had to enable frames and scripts for it to even load
Connor Evans
gay /v/
Ryder Butler
>go to fav site >login recaptcha >click on stores an taxis an all sorts of fadin' shit for 15 min >try again >can't log in my fav site Can they make it less hellish?
Carson Mitchell
That sounds like a fundamental design flaw. >tfw 0.7 soniamdisapoint.jpg
I pay third worlders a pittance to solve captchas by the hundreds for me
Nicholas White
I use FF with uBlock Origin, Decentraleyes, ToS;DR, etc, and I still have 0.9
Brayden Adams
congrats, you became botnet.
Tyler Wilson
i have ublock origin and disable webrtc. i'm guessing i have such a low score because i forced noscript captcha in my 4chanx settings and i only really encounter captcha on Jow Forums. also, ublock origin filters might have something to do with this.
Easton Young
I need to do more than 5 captchas right now to be able to post using Firefox. I guess I won't be able to post at all soon.
Brody Bell
Same here. 5-8 captchas, says completed, click send, get error for not completing captcha, do it again 5-8 times, only now it goes through.
It's much better on Firefox mobile for me, but I haven't hardened it as much. I wonder if it just assigns a better score because there's a lower chance of botting using a mobile device.
Luke Green
> "score": 0.1,
i wonder how much google will pay chinkmoot to implement this piece of shit too
Tyler James
Use an android user-agent
Luis Mitchell
But then you will get served mobile websites, wouldn't you?
Ian Gray
Ofc
Dominic Mitchell
Maybe. On mobile I use Clover so I get noJS captcha.
Kayden Baker
>google is able to better recognize you when you browse while voluntarily logged into their system whodathunkit
Christian Martin
>.1 Huh
Joseph Martin
Yes, but after the captcha just return to the normal user-agent.
Kevin Sanders
With Decentraleyes = 0.7 Without Decentraleyes = 0.3
true, 0.7 Firefox Nightly updated within the last 5 hours, Private Window, bunch of privacy settings and addons, including ublock origin and umatrix. I've been mostly just browsing Jow Forums on this private windows since updating, though. I'm going to close the window, try again and report back.
Adam Jones
I'm on normal Firefox with only uBlock and https everywhere btw
Julian Gonzalez
"dom.serviceWorkers.enabled" => false score: 0.1
Brayden Roberts
With privacy.resist.fingerprinting set to "True" it will always fail.
Jacob Smith
>was 0.3 >tried again went to 0.1 So how much dick will i need to suck to be allowed on the internet