B-but this brand new communism will work this time!

>b-but this brand new communism will work this time!
Why are freetards so dumb?

Attached: 1536632254646.png (793x1972, 130K)

totalitarianism is not communism
convenient that you left out cuba, which has the only model of actual communism on the planet. all they had to do was evict or jail all the fascists and capitalists for being murderers and thieves.

Works on my machine

Cuba was no exception

>communism
>Government
>Money
Nice hike, comrade.

>translation: i'm mad because my fascist parents were jailed for murdering people in cold blood
cry more faggot.

The ability to make contracts like the GPL is the most capitalist concept. Unhappy about the license? Look elsewhere. Free market at its finest.

Communism would be making all software GPL, or all any other kind of license. That's not what GNU advocates. Freedom of license is as important as other freedoms.

Patents and trademarks are pretty communist however. All government-granted monopolies are.

/thread
also, when the shit have GNU lawyers attacked programmers

>everyone who doesn't worship my favorite murderous totalitarian regime is an agent of the slightly different murderous totalitarian regime which it replaced
ok champ

Attached: 1503903088819.gif (112x112, 25K)

This

Abolish patents and copyright law

I agree with the part about GPL, but feel like you don't know shit about patents or trademarks.
Patents exist so that the inventor discloses the details of the invention in exchange for a temporary monopoly. This reduces the wheel-reinventing that would be necessary if patents didn't exist and everyone would keep their inventions secret. The practical problems like patents for every little piece of dumb shit should be solved by fixing the particular law and practice, but the concept itself is useful.
Trademarks exist to protect the particular branding of the product, which in and itself doesn't harm anything because you can always name your product something else. I'm not sure what your problem is with trademarks.

>Private property is pretty communist

/thread

Fucking christ it's just a license.

capitalism is a christcuck invention

>conflating actual property with "intellectual" """property"""

GNU is Not commUnism.

Yes, both exist by virtue of armed law enforcement backed by government

The real problem is ameritards educating themselves with nothing but memes

Property could exist without those. Intellectual property couldn't.

Yup same reason why proletariat or socialism are scary words in America.

*crushes you with a pallet of refurbished tivos and playstations*

The GPL isn't communism. It's a software license. Software should be open source because doing so doesn't fucking cost anything and keeping the source code closed leads to unpatched security vulnerabilities, a lack of portability, no transparency, no ability to fork and improve it. It's a lose lose situation.

Protip: You can sell GPL software. RedHat does it.

>everyone who doesn't like my kosher political position is a fascist!
Daily reminder that you aren't a revolutionary. You're a piece of shit who was born with a silver spoon in its mouth LARPing as a revolutionary. There is literally zero risk in being an open commie. You have the backing of the state, the banks, the media, and legions of lawyers. You are the enemy of the people. You are not one of us.

>communism
>backing of the state and capital

0/10 made me reply

You can't refute it because I'm right. You're a useful idiot to the elites.

Attached: Dq0AH3TXQAA7qeB.jpg (900x450, 64K)

>IT'S NOT REAL COMMUNISM REEEEEEE
dumb freetards

Attached: 1534649994955.png (607x561, 40K)

What part of stateless, moneyless society do you not understand?

>GNU Lawyers
?????

I could ask you take same when you're backed by the establishment of the most powerful nations on Earth. You're either directly paid by groups like the Open Society Foundation, or you're doing it for free which makes you a megafaggot. Either way you're just a dumb butt puppet repeating whatever the TV tells you to think.

Attached: 1537171755262.png (416x435, 141K)

Red Hat sells software? I thought they sell support of GPL software, not the software itself, which makes sense because the latter is... not cost effective, I'd say?

They sell RHEL and support for RHEL. RHEL is not free.

got something to hide pedo?

I didn't realize based george was running a bank. I should open an account with him.

>innocents

Attached: 1481595554501.jpg (358x358, 14K)

Listen dipshit
The very definition of Communism is seizing the means of production. This includes robbing someone. If I, as a programmer, decide to share my code under certain conditions, than that's not communism, because I gave it away for fucking FREE. This has worked very well, because pretty much everyone on here has used free software at some point. Retard.

>RHEL is not free.
Well, maybe not literally RHEL, but its derivatives (sans trademarks) like CentOS, are free. What am I missing?

You got backdoors to hide, CIA nigger?

Exactly. CentOS exists as a free alternative to RHEL.

Attached: 1514296913664.png (600x450, 555K)

t. pedo

Post your social security number, creddit cards, all of it. I want pictures of you naked with a timestamp and floorplan of your house, as well as your address. Oh what's that, you aren't comfortable posting that? Obviously you're hiding something. I don't know what crime you've commit but I know you've broken the law. M-m-maybe you're a p-p-pedophile!

Attached: 1511796055019.png (245x206, 6K)