Fucking commie

fucking commie

Attached: Screenshot 2018-11-13 at 17.41.01.png (856x778, 1.07M)

Other urls found in this thread:

resonancepub.com/rstallman.htm
stallman.org/archives/2015-nov-feb.html
stallman.org/notes/2015-may-aug.html
stallman.org/notes/2014-mar-jun.html
youtube.com/watch?v=GrJpXJY4Oow
gnu.org/philosophy/bill-gates-and-other-communists.en.html
gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Not an argument.

Attached: rms-assange-snowden_.jpg (4320x2880, 3.48M)

kys

That's like saying Hitler was a jew.
OP you're retarded.

3 bing points and a plate of curry has been dispatched to your online microsoft evangelism task force account.

>commie and a russian snitch

>guys let's get rid of intellectual property lmao I swear I'm a libertarian

He’s a commie just accept it

Intellectual property is not a property. You cannot own an idea and sharing them does not make you lose the idea.
>j-just accept it
No.

>Private property is not a property. You cannot own a factory and sharing them does not make you lose the profit you made.
sounds commie to me

I doubt you can elaborate.

Yes there is proof he’s onions boy commie he preaches to leftists libs all the time and they love him which is why I made this thread you nigger

>>Private property is not a property. Y
I didn't say that. I said intellectual property is not a property. That's because you cannot own an idea and sharing them does not make you lose the idea.

Don't misquote me in order to win a lost debate.

I believe in free market and I'm true libertarian. That doesn't mandate me being a authoritarian right winger brainlet.

Useful idiots.

Attached: 3535afdcbd1233eeb2e163897ba15a7e-1440077416943.png (507x679, 75K)

What you morons fail to understand is that you can ally for a common cause with people that might be different than you
I hate commies with a burning passion, they're not even humans in my book, but you can't possibly not believe free software (ie BSD licensed code) is the best and most secure way for the market to evolve and still be on this board

Attached: 1512876504418.jpg (600x600, 63K)

>the best way for the market to evolve
>when everything is literally free
you don't even know your own ideology. kys traitor

>I am a Liberal, not a Libertarian
resonancepub.com/rstallman.htm

Hes not even attempting to appeal to you. Have any of you ever considered that an independently thinking, non-npc could potentially not agree with you and Jow Forums's libertaian circlejerk on every issue?

Attached: 1482191667289.png (800x2000, 677K)

Ah, the BSD shills arrived too.

So your an anarchist? Kys lib Democrat

Free as in freedom, not as in free beer
Corporations can take open source, audited, secure code and implement it in their proprietary applications, resulting in a more secure world
As opposed to each of them making some crap starting from scratch that gets hacked in half a month

the GPL allows anyone to take your code for free idiot. it's in the license.

Those companies as a matter of fact give code back, because they need it maintained
The only unusable code is GPL'd code
t. Theo de Raadt

If FOSS is a "commie" thing, why USSR softwares were proprietary? Checkmate, autists!

Afraid of free market?
Sorry your socialism does not work.

>The only unusable code is GPL'd code
Don't smoke weed everyday.

Ah yes I remember when companies decided to make company secrets public so they could use GPL
This isn't fairyland, you're just incentivising foreign markets that don't give a shit about licenses to get the upper hand by ripping of GPL code and putting it in their proprietary crap
(See China)

Nothing wrong with socialism

>De Raadt summarized the issue as follows:[16]

GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope—the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time. But once the code is GPL'd, we cannot get it back.

that's why I'm against that commie shit. read the thread before shitposting

>I don't understand economics
Neck yourself, socio-retard

lol

Attached: lol.png (366x361, 87K)

>I-I won the debate
>simply stating a meaningless abstraction with nothing to back it up
intellectual property works, dumbass. maybe you should learn some economics before pledging allegiance to an ideology.

>Afraid of communism
>somehow socialism is okay

Attached: 1538229352505.png (511x515, 29K)

At least I’m not a dumb nigger libertarian like they all are I hope all you libertarians get lynched

Ackhually, intellectual property is not property, because it implies an infinite resource
To imply actual property you need to homestead a finite material

>I hate freedom and I hope people that like freedom get lynched
Classic commie if ever I saw one

Socialism is right wing communism is not. Did you fail high school economics?

>lock us
Good. Write your own shit or use BSD garbage if you hate GPL. Nobody gives a flying fuck as only the community matters

They are both differnt

>lose argument
>start trolling to drive attention away from the actual argument

Intellectual property does not work.
Case on point, samsung patented averaging two numbers back in 1995

Too bad there are millions of companies and devs that average numbers their way and doesn't have to pay a single penny because they are not in the jurisdiction of the patent enforcer.

Don't get angry that your primitive single digit IQ brain can't fathom free market and capitalism. Continue with your autistic screeching in your basement, that's what you are best at.
Communism is a form of socialism. And both don't' work.

without IP the entire creative industry would collapse. that means the death of advertising, no more movies, videogames, books, music, etc. because none of them would be profitable. and no more internet, because companies would benefit more without the free flow of information.
to remove IP is to set the clock of human history backwards by 300 years.

But we do
I just said the greatest problem is the GPL community, not corporations, and you keep proving this point

see your cherrypicked "bad apple" cases doesn't undermine the validity of the system.

The idea that Richard Stallman or the GPL is communist is slanderous and the idea is often perpetrated by makers of proprietary software, including Bill Gates, in an attempt to discredit and suppress the ideas of free and open source software. Here is some his thoughts on this subject as well as some additional information to help dispel this fiction.

-stallman.org/archives/2015-nov-feb.html
>I advocate a mixture of capitalism (allow private businesses) and socialism (regulate them tightly, tax them a lot, and keep them small).

-stallman.org/notes/2015-may-aug.html
>Today's unchecked form of capitalism allows the invisible hand to crush people and toss their corpses on the scrap heap.
>The capitalism that the US had in 1970 was much better than the kind we have today. Thus, I don't conclude that any whiff of capitalism is bad, the way Ayn Rand thought about community. Rather, I say that capitalism must be compensated by community, and effectively regulated by democracy.

-stallman.org/notes/2014-mar-jun.html
>Before Reagan, capitalism as practiced in the US created a large middle class, and even workers could get by. We could make this happen again, if we defeat plutocracy.

>The example of China has demonstrated since the 90s that capitalism will not bring freedom to a former Communist country. Now the example of North Korea shows that it does not even necessarily put a limit on the general level of oppression.

-“Free Software in Ethics and Practice” talk at CMC MSU, Moscow, Russia
>youtube.com/watch?v=GrJpXJY4Oow
>Isn't it ironic that the proprietary software developers call us communists? We are the ones who have provided for a free market, where they allow only monopoly.

-"Bill Gates and Other Communists" by Richard Stallman
-gnu.org/philosophy/bill-gates-and-other-communists.en.html
>Bill Gates discussed patents with CNET under the heading of “intellectual property,” a term that covers many disparate laws. He said anyone who won't give blanket support to all these laws is a Communist. Since I'm not a Communist but I have criticized software patents, I got to thinking this calumny might be aimed at me.

>Mr. Gates' secret is out now—he too was a “Communist,” he too recognized that software patents were harmful, until Microsoft became one of these giants. Now Microsoft aims to use software patents to impose whatever price it chooses on you and me. And if we object, Mr. Gates will call us “Communists.”

>gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html
>In the United States, any advocate of other than the most extreme form of laissez-faire selfishness has often heard this accusation. For example, it is leveled against the supporters of a national health care system, such as is found in all the other industrialized nations of the free world. It is leveled against the advocates of public support for the arts, also universal in advanced nations. The idea that citizens have any obligation to the public good is identified in America with Communism. But how similar are these ideas?

>creative industry would collapse
Good