Best language ever created

this.

With implicit interfaces what's the fucking point of generics?

Only if you are disabled and cannot use a powerful type system properly

Trannies use c++ and everything higher level so don't be a trannie learn c

Imperative languages are all for trannies

Using functional languages is the only way to be sure you are not a tranny

>Dude, just have an if block for every single error handling.
sounds like linux system programming

based and monadicly pilled.

>modern language
>doesn't have monadic error handling
No excuse

>all this whining about unnecessary bloat being absent
The absolute state of Jow Forums

That isn't haskell. Also, Rob Pike may be super smart, but he's an insufferable cuck during his presentations. I don't know if he was always like that or if Google made him that way.

>implying you wouldn't lick his balls while he calls you a naughty little gopher

Not a fan. It feels like it's trying to be different just for the sake of being different.

*blocks your path*
unused variable

_

GO+ Node is the patrician back-end combination

Attached: 1541225819065.jpg (443x455, 96K)

compile time type safety for one

>Interfaces replace generics
Gophers are literally retarded if they think like this. Does Java not need generics because you can just cast everything to/from Object?

...for double digit IQ retards

For all of you hating on GO What is the better back-end language/framework/whatever

Attached: 53985327523253.jpg (543x589, 54K)

>Go
>node
More like ASP.net and PHP, if you're a boomer, zoomer

There isn't one, they're either incapable or scared of learning something new, or they're morons.

>php

yikes, just use Node

Any moron can learn Go. It's even simpler than Java.

And whats wrong with that

Well, that's how Java implements generics behind the scenes....

"Behind the scenes" is irrelevant, the semantics of the language are pertinent. You're arguing against any form of abstraction.

>they're either incapable or scared of learning something new, or they're morons.
Please learn to follow a conversation in the future.

Well he is right tho, Jow Forums is scared of any language that was made past C++

Jow Forums likes Haskell and Lisp. Although they are old languages, they evolve rapidly and the GHC/Racket of today look nothing like the Haskell 98/MIT Scheme of yesteryear.

>Jow Forums likes Haskell and Lisp
no i don't

>Jow Forums likes the most ""nerdy"" shit

Color me surprised

Attached: 1537352365762.jpg (414x415, 114K)

if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil { if err != nil {

C does this and C is fine.

Holy-C is the only language approved by God.
If you don't use the Holy-C you are a CIA nigga.

Attached: TempleOS_logo.png (650x490, 20K)

Search rust functional programing on YouTube the 3 video is a tranny

Procedural+object anyday than meme functional

Rust isn't real FP.

Attached: 1526375458960.jpg (1438x788, 124K)

Attached: crying_cat_sto.jpg (318x313, 11K)

How many operating systems are written in it?

One of my professors keeps talking about how he is enjoying using go. What's so good about it?

its good

>he fell in the php is bad meme

tour.golang.org to get a taste

i would prefer a much cleaner error handling, something that forces you to put an error function out of the main code and fill the errors codes without having to use an if statement every 4 lines, most of the time its just the same function that has the same error output plis solve it this.
I like it much more than Python looks cleaner and its not trying to be the next OOP language

it's a very simple language and it has some good reflective properties. it should be easy for anyone with exposure to c like languages.

How do we fix C, bros

You can also do this:
If err := function(a, b); err != nil {
// handle error
}

What's the point of go? What is it good for? I use C and python as my main languages but I like memes

AFAICT, he's always been like that. Designing several kajillion languages at Google has made him worse, certainly. Ask your friendly neighborhood Googler about borgmon and/or borgmon readability.

C is from the early 70's.

C is still fine

It is. Go isn't.

Why is Go error handling bad and C error handling good when they're barely distinct?

Haven't you ever met anyone who twists reality to serve their argument before?

> I like to try-catch every block of code
> I like to dispatch the errors later to know what caused it

Just use monads, my dude.

And then use a language that made IO comically difficult?

>Haskell is the only language with monads
>Haskell IO is hard

American