Don't expect too much from Navi.
Navi will initially launch as a mid tier GPU with RTX 2070 or slightly lower performance for $250-$300 in the second quarter of 2019. It will still have GCN built because...lazy game devs.
Navi+ will release in the fourth quarter and will sit somewhere around GTX 1080 Ti levels at a lower cost.
youtube.com
hey listen
What do you mean don't expect too much.
Getting a $300 card with GTX1080 performance is literally the dream for 1080p. I'd be set for 5+ years.
The Navi they're releasing next year will basically be the same as the Navi in the PS5. Makes sense that all their dev time is going into the next gen consoles.
After PS5 is out they'll start work on high end PC 4k memes.
>What do you mean don't expect too much.
most people just want to play battlefield with all settings maxed out and motion blur, ridiculous contrast and v-sync so that losing with a 0.03 k/d ratio looks really good
makes you think
1080 for 300$? what?
Navi will have similar performance to the 1080 and 2070 and will cost ~$300
That's delusional when AMD recently released an overclocked RX 580 for $50 extra.
Their new cards will be just as a much of a ailure as their VEGA lineup (for gamers)
Top kek, ao accurate.
Man, I'll be building a desktop in Q1 or Q2 after I move with Ryzen 3000, would be really sweet to pair it with a cheap Navi with 2070 performance levels.
>5ghz 3800x/3700x
>Navi 96
Fug yeah, will be a blast playing csgo at 720p low~high mixed settings.
That's what I plan on doing too, the only issue is RAM pricing is still retarded.
Nvidia will just launch a 7nm GPU range and everything will be badly optimised and unplayable on a mid range AMD card outside of 1080p medium settings within a couple years
that's not how it works you mong
amd ages well
nvidia ages badly
You've bought into the hype, AMD isn't magic
Early GCN was just severely under utilized because it was rushed out and the drivers were improved over the years, but we havent seen much improvement since Polaris. And by all accounts Navi is going to also be GCN so i dont expect much improvement unless Navi is really broken when it launches
Remember before the RX480 launch how it was being talked up to be so much higher in performance than it ended up being in reality?
NO FINE WINE FINE WINE!!!!!!!!!
(((Nvidia)))
dang those sure are some recent screenshots ya got there bud
march 2017 that's like yesterday in the tech industry xD
I think it's exactly what i expected, 1080ish performance for 250-300 is great. I'll totally get one, after weeks of looking at reviews.
Well, they promised 1080 levels of performance for about $250 so that's actually looking good.
Jesus, imagine losing your head like this to hardware banter.
I'm not an AMDrone you imbecile, I've had many desktops and all were Intel, and just bought one AMD GPU and many nvidia. But now AMD has very competent CPUs, and I don't need a high end GPU since I mainly just play 720p CS as I said (at 240hz though).
If next year it comes out and ends out being a disappointment, I guess I'll get a 9700k/8700k/9900k or whatever, I'm not a fanboy, don't put me into the same bag as you inbreds.
>hardware banter
>marketing campaigns
I stopped buying and GPUs, because they don't have a decent cuda, or nvenc equivalent.
>Marketing campaigns
>On an obscure mongolian throat singing board
It's just fanboys throwing shit against each other.
>Obscure
It hasn't been "obscure" for a decade, and the hacker known as Jow Forums has been deemed extremely influential for at least that long.
Nvidia also used it clout to retard the adoption of DX12/Vulkan API because it sucks on their Fermi-derived silicon. Turing is their first DX12-tier GPU so I expect DX12/Vulkan adoption to really pick up.
>It will still have GCN built because...lazy game devs.
GCN is merely an ISA.
Yeah I saw that video too.
Sucks the 96/128cu navi + won't beat a 2080ti but it could all change.
Honestly until mcm gpu tech comes big Monolithic dies will only go so far even on 7nm
Why hate on NAVIs? They're great once you install the legendary Psyche peripheral chip.
Navi will be wonderful.
It will be 1080 performance for $300.
A magic driver will make it better than a 1080 Ti.
It will age like fine wine.
Fury x was 980 performance for $600
Vega was 1070 performance for $700
Navi will be 1080 performance for $800
Are they not going to make a newer model of Vega 64? Should I still try to get that GPU then?
>it will still have GCN built
You're a fucking Pajeet.
Vega64 already competes with the GTX 1080, and takes shots at the 1080ti in some titles.
>hurry second gen Navi will only compete with the 1080ti guys, trust me
That's what happens when retards believe currytech """leaks""".
fpbp
>Don't expect too much from Navi.
>Navi will initially launch as a mid tier GPU with RTX 2070 or slightly lower performance for $250-$300
Are you fucking serious? Considering 2070 costs $600 buying Navi will be a no-brainer. Don't expect too much my ass.
Most likely it will be a beta test for Navi before releasing PS5. There is no reason to release PS5 on 14nm instead of 7nm.
Me neither
nigga I literally just bought a 1080 for 450 at microcenter.
kek
>AMD re-re-releases Polaris to keep OEMs happy
>the new arch will be shit because of this
I'd say that's a non-sequitur, but I fear such big word would confuse a retarded vedditor like you, so I won't
It does logically follow, because for a card to be comparable to a 1080 at $300 is financially irresponsible for AMD, especially if they have spent money developing their "new arch".
People buy based on price tags, not by how economjical a purchase is.
Its like you forget RX VEGA exists.
$300 1080 equivalent is a fucking deluded joke.