Is this the best on the market in terms of performance and reliability?
Is this the best on the market in terms of performance and reliability?
Gavin Thomas
Other urls found in this thread:
colfaxresearch.com
twitter.com
Hudson Cruz
Of course, don't forget to compile all your proprietary software products with it to get optimal performance on Intel™ Core™ CPUs™ (everything else will be throttled to hell for no reason, though)
Christopher Hall
bullshit it is GCC
Brandon Anderson
Maybe for vector math, scalar handled just fine or even faster by gcc/vc++
Logan Wood
It's not my prof. had done extensive tests on compilers and Intel had best results by far.(I am not OP btw.)
It was 3 years ago so something might changed though.
Lincoln Brown
I would be interested to see the results. I'm sure for some things it is better but overall I think Clang or GCC would come out on top. Probably GCC.
Julian Watson
It's shit. It can't even parse initializer lists and other modern constructs properly. It implements something quite different than C++.
And each time we got it to compile (with a million workarounds), the performance was not significantly better than gcc or clang.
Ditched it and never looked back.
Logan Barnes
Trust only benchmarks, not anecdotes like
Owen Butler
see first post
Logan Davis
As far as I am aware, the best C++ compiler is actually the .NET compilers. If anything is Microsoft's greatest achievement, I would vouch for the Performance of .NET applications. .NET is also very extensive and surprisingly cross compatible.
I happen to not like Windows or most of the microsoft suite.
Sometimes I have to use Visual Studio for college work, and I don't like using it. Microsoft Office Visio is the best program I am aware of for drawing ERD's / Database Schema's or UML diagrams. Other than that, Microsoft Excel is probably the best program Microsoft have made.
Jayden Gomez
Your teacher is a dumb faggot.
Joshua Murphy
actually wait, I forgot about MS Paint. I grew up with this. Have found memories of drawing Frosty the snowman for Daddy when I was a toddler. Win95 version is still the best. Wish it was available on MacOS and Linux
Christian Moore
>falling for the GCC meme
Clang or btfo
Nolan Baker
You could have just googled for benchmarks and gotten your answer. I'll save you the trouble: GCC wins by a significant margin, Clang a far second, and Intel compiler dead last. Not surprising since the Intel compiler generates nearly double the instructions for some reason.
Daniel Russell
>compile
>proprietary
Luckily, Micro$oft and Apple keep saving cucks from the arcane arts of compiling, and thus only the ancient wizard programmists are the ones who compile with a blessing from Shintel.
Daniel White
>performance and reliability
it landed several lawsuits against Intel, so yeah, that's what you call reliable and performant.
Jacob Hill
>using big bloated compilers
tcc
Jeremiah Evans
That's why I dont use GCC.
Samuel Ramirez
Too bad there's no good .net languages. F# is okay, but it's no scala or haskell that's for sure
Charles Butler
Source?
Heck, that's actually unexpected. I thought Shintel would at least manage to make their CPUs look presentable in common benchmarks.
Josiah Hughes
>not using based Delphi compiler with inline assembler
Sebastian Brooks
Charles Jackson
>no good .net languages
w-whats wrong with C#?
Ayden Ross
shoo shoo pascal shills
Asher Mitchell
It's OK, but it lacks the features I'm interested in, mainly the FP features and effects. While you can implement monads etc in C# it's not pretty or fast. At least you guys are getting pattern matching