I have a problem. On my network I am running out of IP numbers on the subnet. Completely consumer level items are being used. I am planning to expand my garage and add a few more items that will put me over the subnet limit.
What are my options as I want all devices to be able to communicate with eachother.
Also can anyone explain why we even have this limitation in this day and age?
Just fucking change your DHCP scope and update the static addresses on the devices to the new subnet.
How many fucking devices do you have?
Anthony Brooks
tell me more about the sandwich OP
Joshua Jackson
Almost 255.
Adrian Russell
Assuming you're using the network 192.168.0.0/24: First host: 192.168.0.1 Last host: 192.168.0.254 BC: 192.168.0.255 NM: 255.255.255.0 Max hosts: 254
Simplest Solution: Change subnet mask on all devices to 255.255.0.0 First host: 192.168.0.1 Last host: 192.168.255.254 BC: 192.168.255.255 Maximum hosts: 65,534
ffs
David Gomez
Wondering why 255.255.255.0 is the default mask virtually everywhere. Why don't we use a higher/larger class by default even for home networks? Higher overhead?
Hudson Wilson
I don't know the answer to that. For private IPv4 networks you could have: 10.0.0.0/8 (255.0.0.0) Broadcast: 10.255.255.255 HostMin: 10.0.0.1 HostMax: 10.255.255.254 TTL Hosts: 16,777,214
And then with IPv6.....well.....it only goes up. On a LAN especially, it's quicker to scan the entire network for devices if the network is limited. It likely takes less than 10 seconds to scan you entire 255.255.255.0 network. It takes much longer to scan a network as that network gets bigger.
Lucas Bailey
IPv6 doesn't have this problem.
Michael Martin
>Running out of IP addresses at home >Has no idea how networks work Nigga, whatchu doin'? Just how many porn devices do you need in the house?
Michael Clark
Reconfigure your DHCP server and any devices with a static IP with a subnet mask which dedicates more bits to the network part of the address, this isn't a problem at all.
Carter Morris
What the fuck? Are you running a bunch of IP cams, smart plugs, and chromecasts on the same LAN? Time to look into VLANs and learn some proper, basic network topology as well. >Completely consumer level items are being used. jfc, RIP your current network bandwidth. Probably took you an hour just to load this thread. IPv4 doesn't have this problem, either. OP just hooked everything together like a total mong without any foresight whatsoever.
Jayden Nguyen
All the porn in all the rooms.
Landon Brown
What is BC and NM?
Samuel Bell
255 smart dildos to jam into every hole.
David Cruz
I'm more interested in that sandwich desu
Cameron Gonzalez
never seen it abbreviated as such but "bc" looks to mean broadcast nm as network mask
Lucas Gomez
Would that have to be done from the devices? Can we not just do it from the router?
Zachary Phillips
>not knowing shit about networking and subnet masks >/24 -> /16 problem solved is this the state of /g?
Aaron Foster
I just want that tasty looking sammich
but also please elaborate on the devices you have, even if I networked everything I've ever hoarded I'd barely hit 50 addresses
Chase Roberts
Find a better IPS that gives you an IPv6 ip so you can have IPv6 private network..
Grayson Stewart
I'm really having a hard time figuring out how you have 255 devices that need an IP at your home.
Lincoln Rivera
Because most people don't have more than 200 network devices in their homes.
Elijah Morris
probably quicker for scanning tools to search with a smaller scope
Robert Walker
Wifi outlets and wifi light switches are a big chunk.
Sebastian Parker
Do you have 10 outlets per room?
Mason Perez
8
Oliver Foster
How do you have over 200 devices connected to your network and not know how to solve this problem? That must be one ugly fucking mess of a network that's begging to be turned into a botnet.
Just out of curiosity, OP, what's your external IP? :^)
Mason Scott
No, change it to /23 not /16, you fucking mong
Joseph Smith
That doesn't even begin to sound like a possibility. I live in a fairly spacious 3 story house and I can't see myself even breaking 100 if every light and outlet needed their own IP.
Grayson Hall
because large broadcast domains are bad t. network architect
Jaxson Wright
Decrease DHCP lease time
Leo Garcia
God damn it, are you niggers even trying? > What is a broadcast domain?
Grayson Baker
>>be OP >>house is getting robbed >>"DEFENSE SHIELD ACTIVATE!" >>a loud buzzing sound like that of a swarm of bees rumbles through the house >>the floor itself seems to prickle with the vibration. >>the robber looks to the door where it's coming from and a wave vibrating, squirming, and glowing dildos of all colors, shapes, and most disturbingly sizes pours out. >>the dildo bleb advances through network control of all the vibration and squirm. >>The dildo bleb extends a pseudopod, the robber tries to escape, but they are cornered! >>They think they hear something in the all encompassing buzzing and they do: >>"PREPARE YOUR ANUS" the dildo bleb rumbles >>The bleb rushes them, the robber's vision becomes blurry due to the high vibration, I'll let you fill in what happens next. >>Some hours pass and then using traffic data, so as to avoid indecent exposure, the bleb ejects the mindbroken husk of the robber out the door
Kevin Thompson
All wifi.
Easton Nguyen
Literally just make another subdomain to put your IoT in (and block it from accessing the Internet).
Alexander Ramirez
Then how would you consider tell them?
Liam Moore
Wtf did I just voice to text? I meant to say "How do you control them?".
Hunter Ross
jesus christ learn how a firewall/router works
Daniel Thomas
Did you not read the first post asking for help learning the solution? Maybe you missed it. The first post is often hard to see.
Hunter Cruz
Preferably, don't. There's nothing more cringe.
Landon James
Those smart rocks (devices) are connected to a network. When smart rocks are interconnected, they are ruled by network nodes (routers). A router will forward/reject/dnat/snat/trap a rock when said rock need to talk to another rock.
Anthony Jackson
Because having 200+ devices contesting IP addresses will not cause any issues right?
Carter Young
>Because having 200+ devices contesting IP addresses will not cause any issues right? Right, it won't. But lease time won't solve anything if the devices are always on anyway.
Nathaniel Thomas
Why would you not assign IP numbers to devices?
John Bailey
This is the best answer. >Be a moron. >Choose 10.0.0.0/8 for your whole network, because "I gots lots of computers and subnetting is hard :P". >Clients come in, turn on their machines. >DHCP DISCOVER packets and ARP requests start filling up the LAN faster than the loud screams emitted from the tard table in an elementary school cafeteria. >Network dies.
Levi Gonzalez
You know, you can separate subnets
Evan Howard
I know that. People like OP will probably be told to use something like 255.0.0.0 or 255.255.0.0 for their whole LAN instead of doing that, then breaking it down into something manageable, like /24 blocks. Then they'll come back asking why their network goes out when a thousand or so devices simultaneously need an IP address or need the MAC address of the default gateway.
Oliver Bell
OP here. What?
Robert Peterson
yes that also works We could likely argue and talk about "what's the ideal netmask" all day long. I picked /16 primarily to highlight the magnitude in address space that simply changing the address makes.
I overlooked this, totally true. At the same time though, OP and this thread in general are discussing consumer LANs. Realistically you (shouldn't) have negative ramifications to the degree that is being discussed in this thread, and it's also unlikely that the average consumer is going to invest in multiple routers and deal with the administration that demands.
Dylan Allen
ugh you're telling me, i need that cunt in my mouth yesterday
Dylan Bailey
I need every single delicious inch of that bad boy inside me. Right now.