i'm not who you're replying to but amd radeon rx 64 is in the top 10 or top 20 gpu's; and that's from last year. in the context of price ratio they're in the same performance bracket. otherwise no rtx 2080 performs better. but i'm asking. because they are the 2 i'm thinking about getting. right now. cheap best from amd. expensive best from nvidia.
Benjamin Russell
i posted a benchmark link the in 1st post in the thread
William Martinez
all right.
i just figured out that "navi" may be a future server gpu from amd.
"volta" may be the new mainstraem gpu from amd.
so i mean that whatever the next gpu from amd that is better than amd radeon rx vega 64 is.
Oh. I saw a price somewhere. Then I just rounded up. Whatever. I guess I shouldn't have listed prices. Since they're subject to change. It was a bad idea in retrospect.
lol I'd take that upgrade any day. Does the first card even support pcie 2.0?
Cooper Sanchez
lol yeah. comparing the highest with the lowest is always fun. i post stuff like that a lot. but some get mad at me because they say it's not a fair comparison etc.. they don't get it. as for whether or not it even supports pcie 2.0. i wouldn't know. but. as far as i know. it is a relatively recent gpu that came out in the late 2000's or even early 2010's that's made to support extremely cheap computers in extremely poor parts of the world. there's actually older things that can be tested on userbenchmark. but they're not. because it only supports windows vista or higher. i'm tempted to take a windows xp machine, put vista or even 7 or something on it, and see the results. i don't know.
the gpu is still the most dramatic and biggest difference at +380,063% effective speed.
i wonder since amd seems to be beating intel and intel is acting stupid if intel will run out of money to the point where nvidia will make x86 cpu's and maybe even other company's will make x86 cpu's.
then maybe we'd see nvidia x86 cpu's and a bunch of different and maybe even more oepn x86 cpu's; alike risc-v.