Do you actually notice improvements in web browsing when moving up a couple of CPU generations?

Web browsing not really, but i just completed
>pic related
and it makes shit like visual studio run like its notepad.exe. At first I wasnt really sure i could tell the difference. Once I opened my 4th simultaneous VS solution I realized how powerful this thing was. Its like a freight train once you get to this point with desktop applications. Theres no combination of shit a single person could do (practically) to ever slow this down. Sure you can run cinebench and rape the cores, but thats batch work that you wouldnt want to be doing anything user interactive during anyways.

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-12-17 at 1.55.43 PM.png (1063x762, 75K)

I5-4300u

Attached: 87263498237.jpg (640x454, 30K)

I went from 4th gen Intel to Ryzen 7 and yes, it was noticeable.

2500K has much lower single core performance than modern CPUs you fucking retard.

Attached: 16e.jpg (903x960, 45K)

I hope this is bait
>9600k has almost twice the somgle core performance as 2500k
>video playback uses multiple threads
And I thought I was a brainlet...

Single*
Shameless self correction

Web browsing isnt compiled, so no.

3770k @4.7 ive noticed a slower experience in chrome the last 12 months. Still perfectly fine desu.

Attached: 1542548670524.jpg (600x873, 67K)

the fact that this is even a question that needs to be asked really says something about the current state of web design

I have a laptop with an i7 2630qm and a desktop with a ryzen 2700x and there is a difference when watching videos. The i7 handles everything mostly ok, but there is some lag when transitioning to full screen and stuff like that.

went from a 8350 to a 2600
i noticed the difference
everything loads smoother

Well obviously when going from Faildriver to the legendary Sandy Bridge you will see a noticeable improvement.

Although I doubt you see an improvement in regular tasks. Probably 100% placebo.

If you already have a good Core 2 Duo or better, no.

>almost twice
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-2500K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-9600K/619vs4031
>Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed: +40%
And the 9600K is 400MHz faster - factor that out, and it's even less again.
>WHY DO PEOPLE MOCK ME?
Brainlet.

Attached: 1544838476602.jpg (1015x1119, 609K)

I upgraded from pentium 4 to Core2Duo 8400 and the difference is great.
Cannot imagine what would it feels like with newest Intel or AMD processor.

I switched from a P4 to a Haswell Celeron and it was like night and day difference.
Anything higher than Core i3 is even better.

I went from 2600k to 8700k, the difference in almost everything was enormous.

When I switched from a 4670k to a Ryzen, I noticed that I no longer had to shut down every background process to get acceptable frame rates in games.

Lmao that's bullshit

>>WHY DO PEOPLE MOCK ME?
>Brainlet.
Projecting much?

2600k here, everything works just fine

>yes i actually tried it lmoa

Attached: knowyourmeme-smuganimeface.jpg (414x459, 18K)

Interesting I too have a 4670k. Looking to retire it when zen2 hits maybe.
>4670k
>16gb
>rx580 8gb
Been a good rig for the past 5yrs.

Finally someone who understands how I feel. I have a 20c/40t Xeon with 128GB DDR4 and there is literally no load that I can throw at it which would slow it down. Obviously as you mentioned synthetic benchmarks can load it to 100% but then again who runs those 24/7... or even if I would want to do something like that, I can limit it to 18c/36t use and I’d still have 2 free cores to to other things.

You won't notice any improvement swapping to Ryzen, but benchmarks will look better

I've used computers from around 2000 to now and I haven't noticed any huge difference in browsing. Not to say I would want a worse computer but it's been ok or good enough mostly.

GOING TO BUY A THREADRIPPER SO I CAN FINALLY BROWSE SITES POWERED BY REACT AND ANGULAR

From i7 840 to i5 6600k. It was like going from impulse to warp 5.

You're both fucking retards. An normal overclocked Sandy Bridge at 4.6GHz has the same single core Cinebench score as overclocked Poozen (~165 points). A stock 8700K gets ~185 points. Big fucking difference, right? Even at 5.3GHz an 8700K only gets ~230 points, meaning a 40% improvement in the absolute best case scenario, delidded and overclocked to golden sample levels (versus a standard, day to day overclock for Sandy Bridge).

You gaymer brainlets are clueless about the technology that you buy. If it's more newer and more expensiverer, it's more betterer, right?

Attached: bang bang.webm (1920x1080, 2.31M)

>If your CPU is over half a decade old?
My 3570k is still trucking along just fine.
Spectre/Meltdown patches is what made it slower than I would like though

Didn't really notice much of a difference going from nehalem to haswell so I don't know what to think

t. Sandy Bridge user coping with his ancient hardware and making up stats to rationalise not upgrading

Attached: s10r9dr.jpg (648x595, 48K)

t. poorfag butthurt he's stuck with his ancient crap

my nigga

Attached: Untitled.png (803x728, 40K)

Yeah, I'm surprised. Now I didnt stutter when watching 1080p videos and could load more tabs than when I was with P4.