Why the fuck is the iso almost 4 fucking gb in size

why the fuck is the iso almost 4 fucking gb in size

Attached: F3gefQv__400x400.jpg (400x400, 14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.opensuse.org/SDB:Network_installation
download.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/iso/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Current.iso
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because thats the size of a dvd

Because it's the "Winshit and FagOS do it so that means it's okay for me to do it too" mentality. Meanwhile, over in the land of the sane, Q4OS is small enough to fit on 700MB CD while still offering a full Debian base system with non-free drivers bundled, as well as a full Trinity desktop environment.

Install Q4OS.

Attached: snapshot1.png (2560x1024, 1.27M)

en.opensuse.org/SDB:Network_installation

Ot probably has a good amount of packages to get you going. Anyway space does not matter unless you run hundreds of them.

Could be worse. Could be ubuntu.

because you can pick your DE among other things durr

But why not offer separate downloads instead of bundling ever DE wtf

thats what net iso is for retard

because it has all the packages and DEs in the fuckin world, all of which you can choose to or not to install in the installer
also 4gb is normal for a DVD iso
retard nigger

Attached: 1546159711750.gif (200x200, 3.89M)

t. retard

>t.

Attached: 1546163377599.jpg (900x1200, 111K)

noone cares I hope it is ironic because that DE is complete shit, retard

The installer comes bundled with multiple DEs and a whole bunch of optional packages, during the install process it asks you which ones you actually want

Yeah, it's very complex.
download.opensuse.org/tumbleweed/iso/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-NET-x86_64-Current.iso

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (246x138, 10K)

No, you're wrong and it's the best DE. I'm going to continue to shill it because it makes brainlets like you upset. Install Q4OS, brainlet.

Attached: dbd.jpg (405x720, 62K)

How well does Trinity work with modern stuff like Wayland, HiDPI and desktop integration with newer applications? Did they update it to a newer version of Qt behind the scenes while keeping the old KDE 3 look and feel?

Because no one has a smaller USB thumb drive than 8 GB in current year, which btw is almost over. You get one and use it as the installer USB and forget about it until you need to install again.

Because we all use flash drives as boot media. More modern laptops don't have a CD drive.

I remember a brief time where I didn't have a "free" flash drive large enough but I had tons of blank cds. I was limited to minimalist distros because Fedora was 20Mb too large for a cd.

I don't use or intend to ever use Wayland so I wouldn't know about that. Not sure about how it handles high resolution displays either. The icons at least are SVGs, so those would scale fine. I'm pretty sure it uses modern Qt and stuff too, since modern Qt apps run fine on it. The only meaningful answer I can provide about functionality is that you need to just try ityourself.

>open suse is bloated shit
gee, thanks for the "news"

>fedora
>large

Attached: downloadfile-4.jpg (469x463, 29K)

ubuntu is better than suse to be honest.
Fedora, CentOS, Ubuntu and Debian are the non meme options. OpenSUSE is just winshit

dude I tried it live and media keys didn't even work and the menus were ridiculously outdated, I get it's incredibly light on resources but dude it's 2018, get on with the times

Installation is the biggest weakness of OpenPEPE.

did you just call arch a meme

Attached: 1538187157828.jpg (720x717, 51K)

SUSE has the best KDE implementation of the five.
gnomefaggotry is worse than literal wintshit, so there's that.

I don't use OpenSUSE but why is this a problem?

4gb downloads in ~6-7 minutes on a first world internet connection at 100mbps. 4/8gb USBs are cheap as chips, let alone blank DVDs

manjaro kde is glorious

You're on the same board where people tediously count every single package installed on their system and fret over their window manager drawing a window border that's 2 pixels thicker than it "needs to be", what did you expect?

>media keys
You actually use these? The volume keys on my laptop work fine by the way. It's an X230.

Attached: 1539310201582.jpg (651x525, 46K)

Ive never had a manjaro (or any arch based distro) experience that wasn't unstable shit.

The desktop and battle stations threads are just reddit containment. You can reverse image half the posts and the result is r/unixporn.

Z O O M E R

l2linux and arch gets stable

>your holding it wrong
What part of linux do I have to learn?
Am I missing esoteric knowledge of something that causes manjaro to shit itself when Void, Fedora, OpenSUSE, etc. work just fine?

Because it's the DVD image you retarded niggerfaggot.
There's also a ~150MB net image that's easy to find for non-retarded people.

you're getting iq cockblocked by manjaro

Attached: 1538357056654.gif (445x250, 1.78M)

I love how you claim intellectual superiority by using a glorified Arch installer for retards too stupid to follow the Arch wiki.
Special mention of Manjarofags letting their website certificate expire and recommend users to shift their system time back...TWICE IN A FUCKING ROW

I do and it's not only media keys that don't work it's also bright keys and that stuff that do work on kde
yeah what a retard I want to use the keys that my laptop provides, who wouldn't want to download a DE and make all sorts of workarounds instead of picking a fully functional one

Because it literally ships with bloat

at least my arch system doesn't randomly shit itself

Attached: 1535571458918.gif (260x320, 1.97M)

>it's not only media keys that don't work it's also bright keys and that stuff that do work on kde
Sounds like an issue with your specific hardware.

>You get one and use it as the installer USB and forget about it until you need to install again.
And then its broken.

No, you are a zoomer for the phrase "get with the times"
Old times were better, fuck yourself, zoomer

get off the internet and go mown the lawn boomer