Is it true that the human eye can't perceive textures bigger than 4K?

Is it true that the human eye can't perceive textures bigger than 4K?

Are we finally hitting the end of the bloat curve?

Attached: 1512387238273.jpg (564x663, 50K)

>he has a digital sensor as an eye

my eyes are still analog but we are working on it

It's all about optical angular size. Your eyes can't discern to a specific angular size, and that is determined by size and distance from the eye. You may not be able to perceive a bigger texture than 4k on a 1 inch screen a foot away, but on a 100 foot screen a foot away it would look pixelated as fuck.

you are retarded and do not understand how screen size affects the display of screen resolution

invest a bit of money and visit a gaming expo. there look out for exhibitions and check the difference yourself. if you can tell the difference then invest in a 4k solution otherwise 1080p is cheap to manage these days.

We already hit the limit of screen size the human eye can perceive without getting woefully distracted by details

The same concept applies to frame rate but rather than relate to size, speed of motion will dictate if you can or cannot perceive a high rate over a slower one.

but we will never game on 30 metre screens so there is no incentive to create textures that huge

Except that motion is an illusion made in your brain, what you see is a continuous flow of light going into your eyes and you "understand" what you see, and the longer you see the more you get used to it and start to "ignore" the transitioning between frames i.e. you will always feel a difference between 30,60,90,120,144,240,... fps, even 1000000 of fps, but once you get used to it, it's all the same, because you see with your brain, not your eyes, and when your brain can't think faster than the information coming in, you start seeing things getting more and more blurred and you can't discern one from the other