IT'S JUST A REFLECTION, THEY SAID
IT'S JUST A REFLECTION, THEY SAID
What? Damn autistic thread
Various anons were going about, saying that the pads for a second compute unit were just a reflection of light on a poorly encoded YouTube video
>tfw you get a second chiplet
Its called shitposting
Obviously theres going to be multiple versions of the cpu.
>shitposting
the guy was nearly EE user retard level serious
you didnt need to make a thread about this.. lisa basicly confirmed this on pcword interview that there will be a 16 core maximum
You underestimate shitposting level of some anons.
OP is the worst autistic fuck.
Now he is talking to himself
>8c/16t Engineering Sample catch up Intels highest mainstream desktop offering, clocked at 4.7Ghz all core, with unknown clocks while consuming only ~75W vs ~125W
Ryzen 3xxx looks like a fucking beast. muh AMDoredTV leaks about Ryzen seems on spot
7NM IS A LIE
Calm down ACK, you're projecting
Nobody said that.
>sleep 10 hours
>wake up and this argument between two anons is still happening
You got trolled pretty hard mate.
retarded STEMlords aren't anything new or baffling
Oh shit I remember EE user on thr quantum computing spazzout
Why didn't they move the big square up more so they could fit another one of the small squares below by putting it horizontally?
Is AMD retarded and I should stick with intel then?
Because it would severely cripple thermal headroom. They can afford to slap 10 dies under an Epyc/TR heatspreader because it's fucking massive. AM4 is very tiny in comparison
Oh, I see. Thanks
INTODDLERS BTFO
based
Intel is a transistor fab for streetshitting jews. Nobody who respects himself would buy Intel products.
Elaborate, please, I don't know why one's better than other (or it's not)
For the record, not a shill, just curious
literally everyone said it yesterday
TSMC transistor is overall 10% smaller which means better performance and power consumption
Huh... Thought there's a difference between Intel's and TSMC's 10nm transistors
underrated
absolutely based