Retard Detection Technology

why do retards need to be detected? so what if some of them are the source of disease and calamity. people adapt to that stuff and it creates novelty. complex systems are robust that way.

Then there's this guy who keeps saying Dunning-Kruger like he's asserting a fact.
What do we call him?

Hello Dick.

>105 IQ
>genius

Is this what Dunning Kruger feels like?

There needs to be a way to accumulate analyses like these . Each analysis needs to be grounded with references to actual posts/threads (catalog.neet.tv/g/). Then the analyses can be evaluated. It gets complicated pretty fast but there definitely needs to be some kind of meta-Jow Forums sociotechnical system. Building that seems like a lot of work just to study retards...

They're all over the place. youtube.com/watch?v=OmZOZjHjT5E

Attached: homo-diversity.jpg (640x494, 99K)

>"Retard Detection Technology" *for Jow Forums*
Posting in desktop threads

You seem irritated (mad?). Is the Dunning–Kruger description a little too close to home and exposing for you? In a well ordered world you would get the supervision and decision support you need. You should appreciate that and those who are building this Brave New World Order that will manage you and your kind.

In your mind, what are "desktop threads" and how do they pertain to the technology board Jow Forums?

>muh drumpf video

LOL! But you shouldn't say things like that in public. ;)

Attached: Bright_Logo.png (140x199, 2K)

Use your words like a big boy. youtube.com/watch?v=YersIyzsOpc

this is the most based and legit thread to ever be posted on Jow Forums

Funny. But i think I'm on point.
There's some people who use that to dismiss any certainty anyone may have.
It's very ironic.
And he's completely oblivious.

>But i think I'm on point.
You mean ironically or what?
Because if you unironically mean , you're the exact Dick that everyone is talking about.

There is a large class of poorly developed people who are sincerely incapable of knowing that they are low-functioning. It is not in their ability or their agenda to honesty assess themselves. To resolve this problem and make the distinction, a third-party analysis is required. That third-party must be impeccably functional and beyond corruption - a synthetic system.

>you misinterpret, exaggerate and attack people like they're morons
OK so you're missing context because you didn't read the post I replied to then?
Just look at that opinion. The way to detect DK is to know the subject. There's no other way. So basically user here has asserted himself superior to a significant number of board members. Enough to have the certainty to make this claim.
Is it clearer now? That's why I think it's ironic. I really didn't think it was that hard to see what I meant.
Thank you.

>Enough to have the certainty to make this claim.
You're so incredibly certain of this, Dick.

Did you not see how qualified my use of language were?
'Enough' isn't a good way to express a limit stringently.

The tone of feelings-based "reasoning" suggests poor cognitive functioning and that implies a lack of epistemological sophistication. That's a "Dick" signature. ;)

Another "Dick" signature can be found in the agenda. If the priority is to win, dominate, defeat, etc. rather than to develop understanding or resolve discrepancies - if the goal is self-gratification and self-promotion over truth and rationality, then I think it's probably a "Dick".

Funny how you still managed to avoid noticing that you're pretending to be superior to someone, just because he noticed that he's superior to someone else.
You keep asserting certainty that is absent in the posts you're replying to, claiming that observations are dogmas, but in your case it must be OK because you single out someone.

You really need to work on self-awareness.

Smells like a retard.

Attached: monkey-parrot.jpg (620x500, 76K)

Another excellent analysis. You seem to have the high-functioning mind of a modern human. Greetings and salutations!

>explaining what you think
>pretending to be superior
I don't think these are the same thing. I haven't even said that user is wrong.
>you keep asserting certainty that is absent
You mean conclusions like.
>Jow Forums, on average, has a high rate of Dunning-Kruger
Are weak claims? It's just measured Jow Forums to a supposed average. I don't need to repeat myself about the preconditions for this measurement.
>claiming that observations are dogma
I don't, I'd like for you to point to where precisely I do that. But you've struck on the problem both me and user recognize. He in this post
where he essentially explains DK and what's required to make a solid claim of it. It's hard.
To make the claim you'd need a truth to believe in. In this case user has measured by himself. I wouldn't call it dogma. You don't normally call something dogma when it's a personal belief.

My personal belief about DK is that it's almost pointless to bring up. It often ruins discussions because it's not addressing arguments. It's also not verifiable here so it really doesn't land you anywhere even if there was a point to proving it.
When I see people bring up DK it's usually just disruptive, seemingly intentional. To dismiss the arguments with noise. A far better behavior in my option is to say why you don't want to participate. It's way more likely to convince the person that you're right when there's already arguments on the table. And when there isn't it's not steeling them against you with a personal attack, which bringing up DK is often perceived as. I think the view that you take that I'm asserting superiority might motivate that because when I asked to classify user I meant it as a joke. Eluding to classifying everyone who does something. The comic obviously makes it to a humorous point by pretending that annoying people online are somehow fully dedicated to this character.

if Jow Forums is the petri dish, where is the laboratory?

I mean there is Jow Forums's read-only JSON API (github.com/Jow Forums/4chan-API) and all of those public archive sites, there must people people using that stuff, right?

A reasonably effective "laboratory" would probably need a private (paid) API to Jow Forums that includes IP address and browser data per post.

Attached: Hiroyuki_Nishimura's_speech_in_Sapporo_20050831.jpg (554x599, 59K)

finally unplugging the universe's power cord while everyone is still inside it.

Any analysis that would inform reasonable decisions and just actions would require long-term, high-resolution records that are based on calibrated instrumentation that is deeply grounded in physical reality.

>The real Dicks probably have some kind of emotional disorder and often seem to have related cognitive deficiencies.
I suspect it is very common - it may be some kind of human sub-species.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentimentality
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sophistry

Tardzilla: The Tantrum Menace, said what?

Attached: 1toy2p.jpg (568x335, 54K)

How dare you create a thread that challenges the validity of humanity's beloved, vicious imbeciles!

Attached: 1545799548778.png (610x613, 107K)

how do you distinguish a retard from a child?

I think "retard" here is a term of convenience for a developmentally malformed person. A child that is showing signs of developmental deformity needs the careful application of behavioral orthotics, cognitive prosthetics, and moral guidance to correct the misgrowth. A deformed adult needs supervision, management, and containment to cope with the misgrowth.

Reptilian Scientists are going to imprison us!

Attached: TELEMMGLPICT000157926081_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqvxY1SBh3Zy94n8Z2-u3DXpo3vSb9RvelYMC6seL5330.jpg (480x300, 23K)

this

If anyone can figure out a way to build that technology, corporations and governments would pay billions for the ability to identify and solve human resource problems.

Attached: The_No_Asshole_Rule.jpg (266x373, 12K)

Does Jow Forums monitor and assess its volunteer moderators and janitors?

Obviously not, but I suspect they coordinate with backchannel communications and rich database access.

Attached: chimp-with-gun.jpg (468x343, 42K)

It already exists. All of us on earth right now are retards, the actual smart people disappeared millennia ago

Dude, Jow Forums gets its mods from fucking /v/

Are you saying:
1. retard detection technology already exists.
2. everyone on earth right now is retarded.
3. smart people disappeared millennia ago.

Can you assemble your theory in a way that is causal, reasonable, and not cognitively dyslexic?

Have you ever met a smart person?

The technology forum is more influenced by gamer personalities and dramatic style than STEM topics and culture?

Attached: The-Guild.jpg (1300x650, 97K)

We are /v/'s garbage heap

The indications of intelligent, smart people are all over the place, but to answer your question - I don't really see it at this moment.

You mean the consumer technology forum

Fortnite exists.

Oh snap!

Do I?

Attached: Screenshot at 2019-01-11 21-41-12.png (464x260, 63K)

If you had been here for more than 10 minutes yes

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentimentality
>rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sophistry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egocentrism

Maybe the order should be:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egocentrism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentimentality
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sophistry

We're getting close to a model of the Jow Forums-tard's psyche stack.

>consumer technology forum
You mean Jow Forums - Consumerist Whore Board

missing gender dysphoria

youtube.com/watch?v=UjBwe6IL10o

Attached: becoming-x.jpg (480x360, 34K)

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Attached: Arthur_C._Clarke_1965.jpg (1024x689, 377K)

>but average ni/g/ is a gadget normie
>gender dysphoria

So Jow Forums is like Jow Forums except it's for the fatherless mama's-boy type sissies?

Attached: Howard Wolowitz.jpg (525x828, 147K)

I think I've seen DARPA BAA's requesting stuff like that.

A few Python hackers could probably put something together in a weekend if it doesn't need to scale.

Attached: recruiting.jpg (640x480, 97K)

You will need a database guy, yes? :)

Attached: postgresql-logo.png (370x278, 47K)

I think people that think they're just imitating the Dick end up becoming one without realizing it.

The ultimate retard detection system is the MAGA hat. The hats end up on the heads of retards. If you see someone with the hat on, then the hat has done it's job and you can safely know that the person is an idiot.

I used to run a scraper on /b/ back when they had post ids. You could tell that one person made a set of posts in one thread because the posts shared the ids, and then you could look for posts in other archived threads with the same filenames, and then recurse to build up a large connected set of one person's posts over time. (Obviously you'd have to filter out really common file names. Limiting it to the default timestamp filenames usually was good.) It was mildly interesting.

high iq