RIP OLED: MICRO LED IS THE FUTURE AND SAMSUNG HAS KILLED LG AND SONY

>Samsung
Take your suicide bomber technology somewhere else, thanks.

>Just buy a good panel that suits your needs and replace it when it dies you inbreed stupid fags there is 0 reason to jump on memes every 6 months.
But most of us just have an LED because we ignored the OLED meme and now microLED is worth buying. This is actual responsible consumerism.

>and now microLED is worth buying
It's not shill. Hype faggots like you who attempt to scam people into buying higher-class products at release instead of waiting a year for full info to get out from all areas of the industry should get auto-bans.

Attached: 1541225513354.jpg (400x400, 28K)

Jow Forums is like 90% people telling you what is worth buying from a non-normie perspective. stop being such a fag and enjoy the public service.

Even a normie perspective is better than your hypefag perspective full of shit. I pity any dumbfucks who listened to faggots like yourself during the GTX 970 scandal instead of waiting for the full info to come out. Your perspective as a hypefag is something society should collectively urinate over for its own good.

I'm not sure it's MicroLED. Might be quantum dot, presuming they can get a fucking grip on self-emission, but the future is not, was not, and will never be OLED.

>Even a normie perspective is better than your hypefag perspective full of shit.
this isnt hypefag. you can't even name one reason why microLED might be a scandal.

You are a hypefag dumbshit. You incite people to buy shit before all info is out and before any potential scandals and problems can be registered through time, instead of them being patient with their wallets. You are the definition of a piece of garbage which should be beat up by the nearest people as soon as you leave any premises and urinated over for your hypefaggotry.

Can you tell me why MicroLED would be better than a Quantum Dot display that is self-emissive? Genuinely curious about how MicroLED would be better.

I'm still waiting for SED. Fuck you Canon, you screwed it all up.

Attached: tokyoday1_076.jpg (570x380, 37K)

>You incite people to buy shit before all info is out
again you can't name a single thing that is suspicious about microLED.

Again you are a hypefaggot who can't give any assurances that there isn't anything suspicious, making your perspective a liability to anyone dumb enough to listen to your mouthfart instead of waiting patiently for all info to come out through time. I've already done my part by cautioning people about a hypefaggots like yourself so they can restrain their emotions and think clearly.

>future $currentyear
>not having nanoLED display
>future future $currentyear
>not having a picoLED display

>Can you tell me why MicroLED would be better than a Quantum Dot display that is self-emissive?
MicroLED is already self-emissive and potentially cheaper than Quantum Dot. I'd say QD is just a temporary experiment until MicroLED becomes mature and everything will be MicroLED.

Literally died because of the (((US))) (((patent))) legislation.

I wouldn't go that far. zdnet.com/article/samsung-researching-quantum-dot-on-microled-tvs/

>On applying QD technology to MicroLED TVs, the president said it required a very high level of technological sophistication to put QD on micrometer-sized LED invisible to the eye. "MicroLED requires RGB to form at the wafer. If we can apply QD technology and increase productivity we can save costs," he added

Quantum dot is just a marketing buzzword for LCD with an additional filter for better colours.

No, they are already working on making quantum dot self-emissive. Right now, they are photo-emissive, but that isn't the end-goal.

So far, I've been given 2 answers, and neither one of them are factually correct.

samsung's QLED isn't "really" a quantum dot display. The goal is to make electroluminescent quantum dot displays which self-emit light instead of being a fancy phosphor for blue LEDs. The advantages would be that they are cheaper to produce, i.e. they could be printed like OLEDs but them being anorganic their lifespan would hopefully be longer. Quantum dot displays actually would be another step up and better than either microLED and OLED. They might get production costs of microLED down enough that it doesn't matter or they might get lifespans of OLED displays high enough that it doesn matter but we'll see.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dot_display#Active-matrix_light-emitting_diodes

Finally, a real answer. Thank you.

Falling for Television marketing tricks.
KYS you dumb consumer.

>Quantum dot displays actually would be another step up and better than either microLED and OLED
Maybe at peak brightness but that's about it.

>Falling for a marketing trick and calling LCD 'LED'

Attached: IMG_20190112_034326.png (505x910, 694K)

>linking fucking ijustine

out

Its going to be some time still before they're producing singular panels. Right now their displays are all multi panel, with each panel being a relatively small section of the total 75" display shown.
It truly does have the potential to usurp OLED, but at the moment mass production of these panels is a long way off, at least a year or more away.

>oled is on the market and has been for years
would you mind pointing me to a nearest OLED monitor, please?

>OLED has no future
No fucking shit.
How did you figure that a panel that goes to shit after one year of use is not going to be the standard for long

who fucking cares about TV faggots, give me true black monitors
i've been waiting since 2011 when I had to retire my CRT

Same, I want a fucking proper PC screen god damn it.

>who fucking cares about TV faggots, give me true black monitors
>Same, I want a fucking proper PC screen god damn it.
MicroLED is true black. At this rate you're going to be more likely to get an affordable MicroLED screen on your desk than an affordable OLED.

MicroLED PC monitors are likely to show up way before TVs due to the sizes.

Micro in Micro LED means that the LED is very tiny. Regular LEDs used for lighting up your house, shelves, etc are simply too big to put together to form a mobile display. Regular LEDs are known for their efficiency, brightness, longevity and more. They are simply the best solution for a display when shrunk to the size of regular LCD pixels. But you get the advantages of OLED, with it being very thin, not needing a backlight, showing more stunning colors, brightness, foldability, etc. There are no downsides known to Micro LED other than the current high manufacturing costs which are being pushed down as quickly as possible by the industry because of their benefits.

Other than the manufacturing cost, increased manufacturing mistake rate, reduced lifespan due to shrinkage, and increased potential for broken LEDs proportional to the cell quantity increase. Let's not forget increased sensitivity.

>AND SONY

Doesn’t Sony just use Samsung or LG panels?
Sony is doing OLED because it’s the best you can get right now but if microLED becomes a thing they’ll just use that.

the patent litigation was resolved when canon decided tp pull the plug

>Quantum dot displays actually would be another step up and better than either microLED and OLED
in what way? blacker black than black?
wait, can oled do actual white?

the panels are quite big, and one such panel as a monitor would be great

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_Display

I can't handle anything bigger than 27", and even 27 is pushing it, would be nice if 26" was a thing.

modularity is great
2 seperate screens can merge to become one

I've had my 2016 OLED for almost three years now. It's still as good as new, despite thousands of hours of use. Are you just dumb, or do you get paid to spout misinformation?

yes
AF9 and new AG9 they both use LG oled display

God dammit, her cinematrogapher SUCKS.

why is she posted everywhere? She has no idea how anything even works

Wider colour gamut.

Sony has had quantum dots for 5 years and they aren't working on shit because it is not the way to go

full black contrast is an expensive meme

Based miBroled

>Bought OLED in 2018 when a 55" was 1k
>Will buy a MicroLED in 2022 when the tech is affordable
Uh, what a bad decision to buy OLED, I lie awake at night.

we now could have ultrathin CRT...
don't even mean SED or FED

what if it washers out or burns in within the next year?

>full black contrast is an expensive meme
Yeah, but it's the only thing that matters aside from price. Just go to any home electronics retailer and look at the TVs. There's hardly any difference between the $300 chink 4K LEDs and the premium on-brand ones. What always stands out though are the OLEDs with their deep blacks. They always stand out above everything else.

Whatever tech can produce deep blacks without burn-in will be the future.

it certainly won't, you need about 2500 hours of relatively static image to burn in an OLED and I barely use it 5 hours a week.
youtube.com/watch?v=nOcLasaRCzY

>what if it washers out

Sounds like we're finally going to get computer display technology worthy of replacing CRTs.

About fucking time.

I wonder if she agreed like milk

mid video, on CNN news part, 1000 hours is like 6-7 weeks of use for me
dead tech.

>MicroLED PC monitors are likely to show up way before TVs due to the sizes.
Are you really so dense? The individual diodes are too fucking big for anything with DPI useful for monitors. That's why the presented 4K TV was 75". Currently we have no way of crushing the diode size down to 4K at 30" and less.

i'd be fine with 1440p

>BT.2020 covers human vision
>We need to go further
>UV and IR TVs for absolutely natural color!
>"I can see the difference" says a self proclaimed videophile

eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1334167

I watch about 5 hours a week, absolute maximum, 10. Let's assume 7.5 hours a week, 53 weeks a year, not calculating with holdiays. That means the TV runs about 400 hours a year. It certainly won't wash out within 1600 hours of moderate, not HDR exclusive use.

Even if it did, 55" are like 900€ all the time.
Enthusiasts swap their Smartphone every year, just like their GPU, both are very similarly priced and age way worse, way faster. I don't get why people are hating on OLED so much. Yeah they might degrade, so do nVidia GPUs.

sure but high-end full back lit 100hz LEDs are good enough for most people

>BT.2020 covers human vision
you know it's not true when it comes to actual panels, standard is perfect sure, but it was never executed fully yet

You watch TV for 24 Hours a god damn day and watch nothing but CNN? Jesus I'm sorry.

I use monitor 15-16 hours a day mostly for text, yes, it's still a dead tech for PC use.

Well for PC use obviously, but I'm not trying to make that argument.

If the diode size allows 43-49 inch 4k TVs to exist than that would be good enough for your usual sized 1080p/1440p monitors to exist

See

call me when real manufacturer adopts the tech
for now "gibe us monies pls" statements won't do.
assuming their process works, easy to implement and LG/samsung/auopotronics bother with it, it would mean microLED monitors are 3-4 years away at the very least

Sources?

Reading about new displays makes me sad.
How come technology has been literally degrading for years? Why are people happy buying overpriced shit that looks worse than what they had years ago?
I think I'm going to buy a 2nd CRT monitor this year.

Attached: 1497319795281.jpg (457x396, 17K)

See:

>Samsung
>Take your suicide bomber technology somewhere else, thanks.
What does this have to do with MicroLED display technology exactly?

microled pc monitors. it's still only oled tvs around.

can you buy new anywhere? are there any 1080p ones around? How do i connect it through displaport/hdmi?

>can you buy new anywhere?
No you silly willy, you buy them used because they stopped making them back in 2005
>are there any 1080p ones around?
Of course, but you're gonna have a hard time finding one. Lowest end monitors can still do 720p and 1080i though.
>How do i connect it through displaport/hdmi?
If your GPU doesn't have DVI analog connector, you can use a signal converter box.

so, may as well start using floppy discs
ready to bet old used CRTs are burned out and do not come close to a modern IPS, got any measurements to disprove that?

Don't be a retard

Attached: 1462032489385.jpg (1024x768, 372K)

>Sources?
Sources on basic common sense that should be taught to you in high school? Sure:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure_rate
core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4381554.pdf

Shrinkage Stress. Something you should also have been taught in high school physics and chemistry underage illiterate, which projects across materials as well as complex structures such as electronic components.

ah, same old picture of a TN $120 monitor from 2004 compared to CRT from 2003.

I'll wait for my quantum dot microled displays thanks

You are right.
It's not fair for the CRT since those old TN panels had better blacks than modern IPS panles.

>shitty office TN from 2001 that comes free with your DUDE DELL vs quality CRT
gee i wonder why it wins

Modern panels have even worse contrast, don't delude yourself.

You know that TNs always had worse black than IPS? do you have numbers for white and black points on used CRTs or not?

Attached: comparison_2.png (725x416, 63K)

Don't embarrass yourself.

give me numbers. here is modern ones, find me better on used CRT, i'm not arguing contrast on CRT when they were new was better

Attached: comparison_3.png (643x417, 66K)

What do any of these links have to do with microLED specifically retard?

CRTs still have better contrast than any modern panel except OLED.
You'd have to be a blind retard to not notice that.
CRTs also feature crystal clear motion at 60Hz since they are not sample&hold.
Unlike shitty LCD technology where you have to pay premium for a 120Hz panel with strobbing in order to achieve the very same effect for basic motion.
youtube.com/watch?v=zjTgz9byxuo

You literally cannot prove me wrong because these are FACTS.

Threadly reminder that in order not to destroy your OLED monitor you'd have to:
>auto hide taskbar
>auto hide title bars
>auto hide menus
>auto hide status bars
>auto hide scrollbars
>use dark themes wherever possible
>force internet sites darkening by extensions like 'turn off the lights'

whoops

Attached: 1525293860884.jpg (2048x1536, 660K)