This is the future that Republicans want

This is the future that Republicans want.

Jow Forums has and will always be pro net-neutrality.

Attached: GoiA9Nn.png (1118x647, 381K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RgbeB79Dss0
recode.net/2018/12/12/18134899/internet-broafband-faster-ookla
speedtest.net/insights/blog/2018-internet-speeds-global/
itproportal.com/2006/03/13/isp-throttling-of-voip-its-for-real/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

No, I want all of those woke fake news companies to crash and burn. I want a future without any of them.

$29.95
that needs to be changed to $99.95
they're all fucking bastards

What news companies do you want in your future?

>This is the future that Republicans want.
It really isn't.

I'm pro NN but that image is stupid. That's not how things are going to happen.

0/10 bait

It's funny how brainlets always think republicans are the "corporate" party when the ceos of most large corporation are democrats and donate to the DNC. Really makes me think.

Provide more substance to your claim.

this

get over it libtard, you lost

Attached: 1511247876340.png (1000x1000, 533K)

>Comcast and Verizon not portrayed as Jews

You made a wrong turn somewhere in life chief.

None

Companies aren't going to block access to popular sites and sell it. Too much backlash.

What's going to happen is ISPs charging companies to not get throttled thus making competition for newcomers harder.

Perfect, normies will finally have incentives to unplug from the botnet.

CEOs donate to both parties because they treat it as insurance, not party endorsement. 90% of all campaign money on the US come from less than 100 families.

So how fuckin old is that image? I've never actually looked at it before, but
>Ask
>AOL
>msn
>myspace
>friendster
>Yahoo
>napster
>skype is in the marketplace section
>there's no section for communications
This shit is fuckin retarded

>g says my internet will be slower and worse after anti net nuetrality bill passes
>internet is cheaper and faster than ever
why would you guys say the exact opposite of what happened. Are you really that shilly?

>Too much backlash.
Why would that matter? People arent just gonna stop using the internet

>>internet is cheaper and faster than ever

[citation needed]

This is a complete and utter like, fake news, just like all the hype around nn. Just because the law allows for it to happen doesn't mean it will. I'm an insider at AT&T and doesn't it make sense for Netflix, who takes up more bandwidth than anyone to pay more for using the same line as you? Shouldn't video and audio be prioritized over normal web traffic? Not having nn keeps the internet fair and more free than having nn. Kill yourself if you drink that libcuck kolaid.

>Big corporations won't take advantage of me

Jfc

ISPs aren't going block your access to Netflix overnight and charge for it because they know how much bad press it'll attract.

it's funny how brainlets don't understand that the Republicans and Democrats are just 2 factions of a single party, the business party.

youtube.com/watch?v=RgbeB79Dss0

Still, by far better than the future than Jow Forums and commies want.

basic laws of economics

A simple google search

recode.net/2018/12/12/18134899/internet-broafband-faster-ookla

speedtest.net/insights/blog/2018-internet-speeds-global/

My wallet

>doesn't it make sense for Netflix

Netflix was already paying before NN repeal was being discussed. Ironically all the people who support NN repeal because they hate Netflix and YouTube just cemented their dominance because whatever they'll be forced to pay newcomers won't be able to afford. Get ready for an even more consolidated internet.

Attached: images (45).jpg (371x826, 82K)

>Global

Brainlet

Not block. They are gonna sell "optimized access" that's either not slowed down or not measured bandwith.

NN wasn't repealed yet. And nominal speeds won't matter when companies are legally allowed to throttle your stupid ass.

It's not just Netflix, dozens of evil corps that were shitting all over you under Obamas nn. Now they're paying a fair share to build out better networks, that don't just help everyone, but your basement dwelling ass.

this

both parties are fucking awful, eat shit you gigantic kike

>Now they're paying a fair share to build out better networks
ISPs were pocketing that money to pay lobbyists to fuck you over instead of investing in infrastructure. Don't be a retard.

This shit is why internet in the US is a third world tier joke.

>$120 Gb internet
>jews
Verizon is based and redpilled

Yes good goy pay for this here where elsewhere in the world it is free

Find more article, check you speeds and change in plans and price.

It literally was. Fucking insane how much denial you guys are in

If only there were some sort of tier system where people paid for the speed and data cap allotment to tailor their bill to their need...hmmm...nah let's just make the internet pay for play so megacorporations can monopolize the "fast lanes" and the littler companies can fight for scraps in the "regular" (slow) lanes. That's the American way

Paying lobbyists to stop nn, not fuck you over

>AOL
>myspace
*crack* *sip*

Fuck off, data caps are cancer

Cucked and bluepilled.

>implying data caps are going a n y w h e r e
You're a moran if you think otherwise - they are cancer but they rake in cash hand over fist. Why would a company willingly choose to make less money? Some moral obligation? There would need to be some sort of regulation that stipulates data caps to be illegal which will: 1. never happen and 2. If it did happen, companies would just throttle your speed back to 56k once you hit your soft cap.

Yes good goy pay for arbitrary data limits that aren't a part of anything at all.

Funny thing is I have no data cap you fucking corporate cuck

Why are there so many bootlickers here?

Don't be fooled by the term "Net Neutrality". It's like the "Patriot Act" -- it's a carefully chosen name to make morons that don't read the legislation think it's great.

"Net Neutrality" legislation is about preventing unlawful content. Want to download a torrent? Not under Net Neutrality. Want to stream some porn? omg, what about the children?!

Read the legislation. You'll change your mind about "Net Neutrality".

Oy vey it's the cool thing to sell your soul to a company. Why do you think so many kids sell out to big tobacco 2.0 and vape. Selling out is the zoomer thing to do.

Kys kiddie diddler

I dont either because I pay for unlimited data.

The point I'm trying to make here is abolishing NN is stupid because consumers already have choices with regard to how much they want to spend on internet access in the form of speed and data cap. It's as if anti-NN people think that around the country, grandparents are forced to spend $200+ monthly on fiber only to use social media and email when in reality there exists an internet plan that is cheap and effective for their needs
Getting rid of NN just gives large companies more leeway to fuck us, the consumer, under the guise of providing more options.

>Still shilling for NN even after 12 months of no NN again, nothing like that picture has occurred.
How does it feel to be constantly wrong?
I'd really like to know how you even get up in the morning...

You're the one bootlicking for companies like Netflix, for free.

There it is!

I don't understand anything here, I'm very confused. Don't websites already pay money according to the bandwidth they use? Same for regular users. What difference does it make if I'm downloading something 24/7 at max speed or not? Aren't ISPs capable of handling every customer making heavy use of the internet at the same time? And if not why not?

I’m bootlicking me not getting fucked over by my ISP

That's because you don't know how network infrastructure works.
It's pretty common among those who support NN.

Who cares about Netflix? If most of the traffic on the internet came from torrents ISPs would go after that

Infowars. Zerohedge. DramaAlert. National Enquirer.

>NN goes completely away
>companies like Netflix opt for fast lanes, have to pay a higher rate to operate their services
>consumers foot the bill for Netflix when they increase their sub fee so they can maintain their margins
>consumers also paying a premium to their ISP for a fast lane so they can stream
>but at least it's not the gubment

This is the future you all chose.

>"""free"""
>not just because the real Jews (government) take 80% of your taxes
Oh god. The cope is too much for me

>Is this what the republicans want?
You really have to be a special type of retarded to think it would be structured in the same way as cable packages where.
Businesses will just crumble overnight with models like that, and surely the feds would step in and stop it. But no, keep thinking that they're going to do this and not try to throttle cellular networks for better optimization anyways.

>Aren't ISPs capable of handling every customer making heavy use of the internet at the same time? And if not why not?

Because legislation allows ISPs to oversell their capacity since statistically you can estimate many customers are going to be online at a given time. No ISP in the world would be able to handle everyone trying to stream content at the same time.

Eventually ISPs are forced to invest in infrastructure to accommodate the changing needs of the public. The difference this time is that ISPs in the US can now refuse to do that and throttle whatever they don't like instead.

This is not true, don't lie user

on the one hand i actually hope this becomes reality because that would mean that bloated UIs would be BTFOd
on the other hand i wouldn't be able to get anime as easily

Yeah, save that booty for Google. And don't come crying when you won't be able to visit any page without chrome.

That does that have to do with NN, moron

Why wouldn't it happen? It happens at other businesses that get new expenses of their own. For instance a long-term parking lot at the local airport now charges an additional $1 per day to consumers because minimum wage went up and the owner now has to offset that cost.

>It literally was.
it wasn't implemented yet. and why are we having this conversation if you're right anyway?

I don't think they actually give a fuck about consumer backlash in the long term, the bigger thing is that no ISP wants to be the first to go down that road. First one to go to pay-to-play internet is going to lose a lot of customers to their competitors.
The second thing you mentioned has already happened, more or less, though iirc the FCC put a stop to it.

Like people have said, these companies have been having to pay before the nn meme happened. Nn has nothing to do with price hikes, only reason Netflix is raising prices is because they need to boost revenue to impress investors since they're market is tapped

Independent commentators online, which is becoming impossible because of censorship from leftist corporate firms.

You're just butthurt that cuckflix is upping your subscription fees, serves you right for being a degenerate faggot.

what's the difference? consumer gains fuck all from it. they should have

The whole thing started when ISPs decided to enter the internet ads market and Google cried foul, retard.
It is and always was about fucking ads and nothing else, because nothing else is profitable on the internet.
No google monopoly on ads, no money, no clout, suddenly no one cares what google has to say about the internet future. And I could give a rat's ass with ublock.

>>NN goes completely away>companies like Netflix opt for fast lanes, have to pay a higher rate to operate their services>consumers foot the bill for Netflix when they increase their sub fee so they can maintain their margins


This is the only part that actually happened, the rest is you being a little bitch.

this
nice try leftie scum

Attached: 1501548286734.gif (291x400, 570K)

Where the fuck is internet free?
t.euroslav

NN will never come back reddit, take your commie whining back there.

>reee muh
Fuck off, you insufferable, cock munching queer.

This.

None of them. Fuck journalists. I hope they all die penniless with no friends or family. I hope everything that gives them even the tiniest of mortal pleasures is torn from them. They deserve nothing.

Attached: akm4VQdk_700w_0.jpg (326x294, 17K)

That's what they were doing with cable and satellite tv for ages.
Suddenly all channels from one company does dark, boo hoo unreasonable demands, boo hoo call disney and complain, boo hoo comcast is lowballing us we have no money for quality programming.
Then either someone starts losing clients or someone starts losong nielsen ratings and they come to terns.
They just want to do this shit all over again, and with nn they absolutely couldn't.

thats really old school type shit

If blocking ads is so easy why would want to give ISPs the power to throttle you just because you hate Google?

Don't forget Google is also an ISP so good job.

TYT and their network of affliates, other independent journalists, International places like NHK World, RT, Al Jazzera, BBC etc. The big 3 cable news can blow a dick.

>>consumers also paying a premium to their ISP for a fast lane so they can stream


Actually my internet speeds have increased due to competition in my area, the first real competition in decades and my bill hasn't increased one penny.

If killing NN is what caused that then you're pants-on-head retarded for wanting it.

Where do you even live? NN is still being fought over at the state level in some places so you might just be linking phony causation.

If the internet ever became like this on a large scale, we'd all probably just go back to Usenet since by that point it will be forgotten and unregulated (as if it isn't already)

if there was ever a universal truth to anything, it's that pirates and degenerates always find a way

have you heard of public ISP's? They are really simple things and all it takes is a pissed off public representative body to enact changes to the law and effectively bankrupt the big ISP's

Reminder that static bandwidth is a measurement specifically used by ISP's to fuck consumers, there's no actual cost to the stuff they are selling, only the initial upfront costs of the infrastructure behind it that is essentially built with gov't grants and tax breaks/taxpayer money. Sure, power is a factor, but every year the tech gets more efficient but the prices either stay the same or rise.

ISP's basically print money for years and maybe every 5-10 years they have an actual large thing to pay for.

N. MI

That's going to be the dumbest thing to do next to your birth, no one is going to throttle anything.
The second someone decides to throttle netflix, literally all other ISPs would run comparative ads thrashing their speed. Who would want to do that?

Netflix already gets throttled naturally during peak times.

sure feels good to be scum mate

Attached: 1541503815074.png (450x450, 16K)

ISPs were already caught throttling before, dumbass. They'd have liked VoIP tech if legislation allowed them to do that back then.

itproportal.com/2006/03/13/isp-throttling-of-voip-its-for-real/

You morons are so fucking naive I swear to God

Why don’t you? You made the fucking thread

Beat me to it lel

Attached: awesome-quotes.jpg (474x670, 46K)

killed VOIP*

It's going to be funny if somebody invents a way to make anime real but amerifats are left out because ISPs decided it wastes too much bandwidth

Because there was no opposing cartel of internet services back then, and now there is.

Yeah, things are really above board when the term cartel is used unironically